Will Democrats work out more?
Now that Democrats are in the majority, they better start looking the part.
And now that they’re getting used to flexing their political muscle, it looks like many are trying to improve their real muscles by heading to “the official gym of the House of Representatives” — Gold’s Gym on Capitol Hill (Hill staffers can work out there for as little as $13.95 per month). It’s the place all those saggy, weary Capitol Hill bodies go to get that Aeron chair-mold out of their derrieres.
Since the November elections, there has been a noticeable increase in foot traffic at Gold’s. “The gym is packed!” a three-year member of Gold’s Gym tells Yeas & Nays. “After over a decade of hibernation, Democrats are full of energy!” (Of course, it could just be Republicans hoping to get in shape to minimize a Democratic beating.)
Gold’s Gym confirms that interest in the facility has spiked since November, and they expect a completely full house come January.
But although Gold’s Gym may welcome the new faces, Republican regulars may not be so keen to pump iron next to their political opponents.
“At first, I was confused why there were so many new and out-of-shape bodies at the Gold’s Gym,” our source tells us. “Then I put it all together: an ACLU T-shirt; a ‘Firemen for Kerry’ hat; Boston College shorts. The Democrats had even taken over my gym! Bowflex has never looked so good.”
This GOP source notices that, during Republican congressional rule, all of the heavy weight machines were frequently busy; now, it looks as if Democrats prefer the treadmill (Republicans would likely spin it to suggest that the gym helps Democrats get “cut” and “run”).
Fortunately for the gym’s independent members, it doesn’t look like any major brawls are going to break out over which news station Gold’s Gym features on its televisions: The relatively “safe” choice of CNN’s Headline News is the news station offered.
Go ahead, make my case
Let’s put Al Gore and Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., in a room and see what happens. Inhofe, one of the country’s most noteworthy global-warming skeptics, also happens to chair the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.
Wednesday, he held a hearing into the media’s portrayal of climate change. Highlights included a “New York Times-line,” which noted some of the paper’s 20th century headlines, which seem to alternately warn of global warming and the next ice age.
Standing in for Gore on Wednesday was Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who accepts the theory of climate change.
“There is a lot of groupthink on this, and I thank Sen. Boxer for making my case for me,” said panelist Dan Gainor of the free market watchdog group, the Business & Media Institute.
Inhofe quickly echoed, saying to Boxer: “I agree with Mr. Gainor on Sen. Boxer. Your exhibits make my case.”
But Boxer would have none of it. “We have a chairman who says this is all a hoax,” she said. “I think everything I’m saying has merit. There is consensus here.”
Cooling their heels for the Dems
Are Democrats tardier than their Republican counterparts?
Whatever its faults, the Republican House leadership under majority leaders Tom DeLay and John Boehner was known for running a tight ship with its weekly pen-and-pad briefings.
But things might become a bit looser as power changes hands. Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was 45 minutes late for a meeting with the news media Monday.
Then on Tuesday, Democrats convened in the Cannon Caucus Room for a set of policy briefings. A promised 11 a.m. news conference never happened, and another at 12:15 p.m. got underway eight minutes late.
“It’s like they’re on Democrat time,” said one observer. And so, another term is coined.
Reid: ‘Vindicated’ by Iraq report
Among other things, the Iraq Study Group gave Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., the combative minority leader who will become majority leader next month, some ammunition in his war of words with President Bush.
When asked Wednesday whether the group’s report makes him “feel vindicated,” he offered a one-word answer: “Yes.”
Reid also informed reporters at a Democratic news conference that they would be getting much from Silent Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., the incoming chairman of the Intelligence Committee. “You won’t be seeing him holding press conferences about what goes on in that committee,” said Reid.
But during the presser, who was that outside the ropes, leaning over reporters to hear better? Why it was Sen. John Warner, R-Va., the current Armed Services Committee chairman, apparently trying to get some intelligence of his own.
Think tank
“What was the first thing President Bush likely said after reading the Iraq Study Group’s report?”
“Heckuva’ job, Study Group.”
– Danielle Jones, The Hotline
“All things considered, I’d rather be reading Camus.”
– Norman Ornstein, American Enterprise Institute
“ ‘Not!’ And then he and Karl collapsed into a fit of giggles, muttering ‘how’s your boy’ and snorting.”
– Ana Marie Cox, Time.com



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate