Multimedia News

Grammy Nominations Concert highlights
20 photos
Christina Aguilera arrives at 'The Grammy Nom...
Rockefeller Center Christmas tree lights up
20 photos
People look on from office windows as the Roc...
Celestial love triangle
20 photos
The crescent moon is accompanied by planets V...
Britney's back with new album, tour
20 photos
Singer Britney Spears performs on ABC's 'Good...
World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...

New stadium parking to be aboveground

Nov 15, 2006 2:00 AM (751 days ago) by Michael Neibauer, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The D.C. Council on Tuesday agreed to finance three freestanding parking garages at the new Southeast ballpark, ending any hope in the near term for mixed-use residential and retail development adjacent to the stadium.

In approving the $36 million proposal, 10 council members voted for the most unpopular alternative for parking at the under construction Washington Nationals’ stadium. But the 1,225 aboveground garage spaces should be ready by Opening Day 2008 as required under the agreement with Major League Baseball, proponents of the plan said, saving the city tens of millions of dollars in penalties for late delivery.

The downside? Building non-reinforced freestanding garages shatters plans for revenue-generating development on the city-owned site, at least for now. The Nationals’ ownership, led by developer Ted Lerner, has only agreed to reconsider development there sometime in the future.

“Our new elected leadership of the District of Columbia must safeguard our development rights,” said Ward 5 Council Member Vincent Orange, who backed the resolution, which exempts the project from a zoning requirement that all garages go underground.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Mayor-elect Adrian Fenty, Ward 4 Council member, was among those who struck the deal with Lerner and culled the 10 votes, though he had nothing to say during Tuesday’s debate.

Though he had sought a parking plan with immediate benefits for the District, Mayor Anthony Williams said he was “pleased” with the Council’s decision.

“Today’s vote allows the entire project to continue moving forward in a way that should satisfy all sides, including the Lerner family,” Williams said in a statement.

The proposal was vehemently opposed by Council Members David Catania, Carol Schwartz and Marion Barry.

Stadium supporters have “lost all credibility,” Catania said, saying the aboveground garages will produce no economic benefit for the city.

mneibauer@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

4:23 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 19, 2008 re: "Council to look into van-accessible parking"

Examiner Reader Sam Burrello said:
My wife is disabled and we do drive a van but not wheel chair adapted. Only a fraction of hadicap people have these vans and if not allowed to park in van accessable sites we would have to pass these spaces and walk a great distance. The spaces would be empty if not allowed by car and non adapted vans

8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:39 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Jimmy said:
More things in in the United States need to be free, like medical care and housing, along with public transportation and parking. How to pay for it all, just ramp up our production and tax the wealthy down to a level thats sensible a income and relaunch the tax money in impact areas like education and research. The people can do it, but not with the team we have now in place, like people in charge like Nancy Polosi and her friends, these people and their ideas are the problem.

8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:07 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Examiner Reader said:
what ever happened to free parking?

12 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:12 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Examiner Reader said:
What are the Burlingame citizens complaining about? Parking lot on Park ave. $1.00 for 10 hours...come to SF.......

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:30 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Carl said:
Come to San Francisco. Most of the meters have a time limit displayed behind scratched plastic you can't read. Guaranteed city govt here wont fix it. Not a major problem to spend city dollars on...unless of course you can't read the time limit display and get a ticket. Oh well. They don't care so why should I. I NEVER shop in San Francisco. Parking Parking Parking. I do ALL my shopping out of San Francisco. I shop at Kmart and eat at Apple Bees in Redwood City every weekend. Try it. You'll like it. Friendlier workers, no parking issues, better prices, no crowd rush, and yes the wonderful smart parking meters. Gotta love it. "Anywhere But San Francisco"

9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:57 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Examiner Reader said:
I love your writing style.

9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:55 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 26, 2008 re: "Meters don't make the grade"

Examiner Reader said:
GREAT JOB KEEP up the awesome work

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:32 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "More solar-powered parking meters coming to Baltimore"

Examiner Reader said:
On two separate occassions the meters did not work. The first time it took my money and did not deliver a receipt. The second time it took some of my money, spit out some and did not register some, but kept it. On the first occassion the authority said they would refund my money, but it has been over a month and I have received nothing. I'm waiting for a response to the second incident but not holding my breath

257 agree | 220 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:20 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 25, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
"This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects." WRONG--this measure will reduce the cost of apartments by $50,000-$80,000. That's a big chunk of change, especially for the poor, and above all for those who can't afford cars in the first place. Why should the government FORCE you to buy a parking space when you don't want one? All this rule is give you FREEDOM OF CHOICE.

190 agree | 202 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:15 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
Right on Tom, poor people don't drive so why not take away their parking. You progressives give me the creeps. The minimum is ONE parking space for every FOUR units of housing and you want to take that away. Tom, you and Peskin need to Get A LIFE! I bet that Mr. Peskin has at least 2 parking spaces in his million dollar condo in Nothe Beach. Leave us alone!!!

203 agree | 209 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects. It makes a hard life still harder. Sad.

194 agree | 223 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:01 PM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

Examiner Reader said:
I have been in Baltimore for the last 5 years. I have a disability, because of which my lower limbs are paralyzed. Recently, I have found a spurt in disability tags for parking in the last couple of years. I surveyed 7 vehicles on Redwood street, and found five had disabled tag!!! I have found that some young people in early 20s park their vehicle and walk 5 blocks without any trouble, and I on a wheelchair is unable to get a parking place. Sometimes it has been frustrating. The cops cannot do anything, as long as these disability tags certified indiscriminately by family physicians. Unfortunately, carrying a "illegal" disabled tags no longer is a social stigma. It has become as acceptable as illegal license. I hope, this letter brings some sense of morality and social responsibility to those people using disabled tags. They should understand the hardship they are causing to the disabled community. Regards, Jeremy

349 agree | 375 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

kilteddude said:
Does this mean they will stop ticketing legally parked cars? I've got 2 tickets in the last year while parked legally.

358 agree | 339 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:57 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

Examiner Reader said:
DAMN IT!

367 agree | 354 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "New ticket device puts illegal parkers on camera"

Ticket Amnesty said:
Ticket fines in Baltimore are absurd....so, don't pay them. Request and officer when you go to court for your ticket+fines and if he/she doesn't show (they rarely, if ever will) you only have to pay the fine + court costs....goodbye $800 fine on $21 ticket.

650 agree | 377 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement