‘City of Trees’ designates its ‘Champions’ in the District
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Washington Mayor Anthony Williams shakes hands Thursday with Hans Johannsen, formerly the cities chief forester for 32 years, who received Casey Trees’ first Lifetime Achievement Award for his service. Awards are given out to public officials for their work to improve the city’s forestry efforts under D.C.’s biggest pecan tree, which sits on the estate of the Tudor House Historic House and Garden in Georgetown in Washington.
(Andrew Harnik/Examiner)
Washington Mayor Anthony Williams shakes hands Thursday with Hans Johannsen, formerly the cities chief forester for 32 years, who received Casey Trees’ first Lifetime Achievement Award for his service. Awards are given out to public officials for their work to improve the city’s forestry efforts under D.C.’s biggest pecan tree, which sits on the estate of the Tudor House Historic House and Garden in Georgetown in Washington.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The District’s largest trees have witnessed their share of carousing, climbing, canoodling and counting sheep. They are champions in the “City of Trees” that have stood tall, some for centuries, and on Thursday they were honored by the people committed to their protection.

Mary Arcuri of the 5000 block of Reno Road NW is the proud owner of the city’s largest dawn redwood, which stands at 151 inches around and 75 feet high. It is a family tree, she says: Her nephews climb it, and her dogs enjoy relaxing on its exposed roots.

“It’s a tree that lives with us and we love it,” Arcuri said.

During an event at the Tudor Place Historic House and Garden north of Georgetown, home to the largest pecan tree, the nonprofit Casey Trees unveiled its register of the largest hardwoods and softwoods in Washington, by selected species. From the tulip poplar to the Black Walnut, the ginkgo to the weeping willow, 26 trees made the list, some with trunks 38 feet around, or more.

The largest is a white oak in the 2800 block of Northampton Street NW — 220 inches in circumference, 105 feet tall and 122 feet across at its crown. Ken Williams, who owns the property most shaded by the mammoth tree, said visitors are all welcome to “come and enjoy.”

Casey Trees also honored outgoing Mayor Anthony Williams for his action on behalf of the District’s urban forest. Under the Williams administration, the District has planted some 25,000 trees and greatly reduced the response time and backlog for pruning and other maintenance, said Mark Buscaino, the organization’s executive director.

“Trees really are a great symbol of stewardship, of our responsibility to leave things better than we found them,” the mayor said.

More giant D.C. trees

» Northern red oak, 474 inch circumference and 135 feet tall, McPherson Square

» Ginkgo, 357 inch circumference and 102 feet tall, Farragut Square

» Japanese pagoda, 488 inch circumference and 92 feet tall, President’s Park

» Horse chestnut, 487 inch circumference and 56 feet tall, Capitol Reflecting Pool

» Scarlet oak, 188 inch circumference and 95 feet tall, 3374 Minnesota Ave. SE

» Tulip poplar, 223 inch circumference and 105 feet tall, Montrose Park

» White ash, 472 inch circumference and 82 feet tall, 17th Street and Independence Avenue

mneibauer@dcexaminer.com

Name
Comments

characters left

Article Comments

Comments from Examiner Readers

9:56 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "Greenbelt can continue preservation"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess when the salmon count is so low that wildlife agencies have to place a mandatory ban on fishing to replenish their numbers, and when the whales are about 10-15% thinner, it's a sign that the oceans are stressed out. Kudos to the state Supreme Court for protecting the ocean and giving our coasts protective areas to restore ecosystems and rejuvenate her marine life.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

4:23 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Dark skies for solar-training plan"

Examiner Reader said:
Policy issues related to the solar program need to be vetted before money is spent, McGoldrick told The Examiner in an e-mail. The supervisor characterized Solar City�s threat to abandon The City as �greenmail.� Oh man...can someone please get goldbricker McGoldrick to get a real life, hopefully one not in public service! Geeze if this guy ran the world we would be forever spitting in the wind.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:02 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
Next step: Wire Hangers!!! (Dry cleaners don't seem to want them back).

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
I throw everything I can into the recycling bin and let them decide.

6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:23 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Maryland�s coastal grass continues to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
i think the bicycle built for water is a dum story

7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:36 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 31, 2008 re: "It's a bicycle built for pure water, too"

Examiner Reader said:
how much will the bike cost?

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:48 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 29, 2008 re: "The City gets dark tonight"

Examiner Reader said:
Good. Can't wait for the criminals to do a number on the City!

7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
there are no heading on what each paragraph is about

114 agree | 147 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Bob said:
What concerns me isn't so much all this green stuff; (and green is just a buzz word for Corporate America to make big bucks)what is being done to animal species being wiped off the face of the earth? Polar bear, Rhinos (being slaughered for their horns); elephants, snow tigers, and the list goes on and on;

178 agree | 134 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:43 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Examiner Reader said:
all this green is a bunch of crap....i still burn wood, drive my car alone to work (better than some smelly bus or bart) do not recycle..thats what i pay those garbagemen for. i would rather use my firplace and wood than pay Pacific Grred and Extortion zny of their rip bills.

183 agree | 145 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:21 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Audubon study sees local birds particularly threatened"

Another Examiner Reader said:
Sure nuclear power is "clean." Just ask the Chernobylites.

130 agree | 189 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:56 PM MST on Thu., May. 24, 2007 re: "Experts: Light pollution growing environmental problem"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for this article. However it needs more development, especially in the area of light trespass onto down hill property. Full cut off on level ground is not full cut off on slopes. Also, motion detectors often activate when a person walks on his own property and is detected by the neighbor's poorly designed/installed system. Please consider this in the future.

594 agree | 366 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
Al Gore should provide more support for nuclear power. When you come to the realization that we have to STOP using fossil fuels, there is nothing else that can produce the huge amount of power that would be required to replace fossil fuels. Nuclear already provides 20% of our electric power. Nuclear power is as cheap or maybe cheaper than coal, especially when you compare 'clean coal' vs. nuclear. It is time we started replacing all of our coal fired power plants with nuclear.

586 agree | 370 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:27 AM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Environmental advisers request study of county�s waste stream"

Sandy Wisner said:
Dear Kelsey, If you take 15% of one portion of a thing and 17% of another portion of the same thing, you will not get 32% of the whole. Depending on the size of the portions, you will have between 15 and 17 percent of the whole.

553 agree | 392 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
INCLUDED
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)