WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Folks tuning into last week’s D.C. Council session received a lesson in how not to conduct government business and how to imperil public funds. They also were treated to antics rivaling an Amos ‘n’ Andy/Three Stooges movie. Where is Moe when you need him?

How hard is it, really, to choose and fund a parking plan?

Let’s go the clips: Mayor Anthony Williams, the council and the D.C. Sports & Entertainment Commission approved a legal agreement with Major League Baseball to provide 1,225 parking spaces by opening day 2008. To build underground garages and meet that deadline, District officials needed to start construction Sept. 1. (That date was pushed back to Oct. 5.) The council capped spending for the entire baseball project — stadium and parking — at $611 million. Members knew that amount was insufficient.

Current and future mayors Williams and Adrian Fenty (aided by Council Member Jack Evans), and the current and future council chairmen — Linda Cropp and Vincent Gray — last week attempted to bring sobering reality to the problem. They urged lawmakers to declare an emergency, examine two parking proposals and approve additional funds for the chosen plan.

That didn’t happen.

Council Member Vincent Orange asserted, incorrectly, that choosing either plan jeopardized a fund for community projects. At-large member Phil “all trees and no forest” Mendelson was “unready.” Council Member David Catania argued the city should deliberately violate the lease with the Nationals ownership group headed by Ted Lerner.

(Any wonder why some youth, residents and government workers are perfectly comfortable with breaking rules and laws.)

Chief Financial Officer Natwar Gandhi this week told the council it has dithered too long. Only one viable option remains: to build above ground garages. Further, if the city fails to meet its obligation, it faces significant penalties and revenue losses. The price tag for the District’s irresponsible behavior could reach $80 million.

All this drama can’t be over two plots of land, comprising roughly 6 percent of the entire baseball district, which includes the stadium and surrounding blocks.

It isn’t. It’s about Herb Miller — the city’s favored developer — on whose behalf some officials floated an unsubstantiated offer of $61 million for development rights. Miller has been unable to satisfy Gandhi’s concerns, including the demand to “show me the money.” Yet, some council members persist in doing Miller’s bidding.

The Lerner group has asked only that the city honor its agreement. They assert that failing to provide adequate parking could taint the fan experience, which could affect the number of people coming to the ballpark district, which could reduce the amount of money going into the city’s coffers, including that community fund Orange thinks is his legacy.

Gray says the council may need a consultant to objectively explain the options. The choices have been presented ad nauseum. The only thing required now is courage.

Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for WAMU’s D.C. Politics Hour with Kojo and Jonetta. E-mail her at Rosebook1@aol.com.

Comments from Examiner Readers

7:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Lisa said:
Do a grammar check -- you have a who/whom problem in the first sentence of the 6th paragraph. Are there no editors around?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:52 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Barras, Please stop straddling the fence!!! One minute you are heralding Rhee as the best thing since slice bread and now you speak the truth...A woman WITHOUT a Plan

0 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

5:39 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader SL said:
This article truly addressed the major issue that continues to cripple the school system and drive highly qualified teachers from educating in the district. There is an urgent need for accountability starting all the way from the top. Without significant changes, it we will only be like a bandaid being placed over an infected wound.

108 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

3:01 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Right...tell me another one said:
You know this is not going to be popular, but although Janey had the rights ideas on curriculum, you swear he was a paid consultant and never managed staff. He did not set a mission, did not review employees based on if they lived up to the mission even his own Declaration of Education and for that reason did a disservice to those who are/were talented in central office. Because he failed to set the tone. After awhile the bullies would take hold. The people who were in their cars at 5:01pm, and took Friday's off as they "worked from home" all week. He fired maybe one person--whose work was such an embarassment --she was barely literate and was asked not to return by a parents group. Her position Head of Communications. (I could not make this up). But who were talented, head of accountability, deputy business officer, community liaison all left when they were great talents.

135 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:42 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately Assistant Superintendent Francisco Millet's story is common in the District of Columbia Public Schools. I can name another Assistant Superintendent who shares his style and attempts to intimidate teachers.

134 agree | 132 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

5:36 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Karen Dickerson said:
The earnest attention being paid to the current state of the DCPS is long overdue and much welcomed. Many residents undoubtedly applaud the sweeping reforms Chancellor Rhee and the Mayor plan to institute and recognize that not everyone in the system is inept, an idiot, or even a crook. Going beyond simply making it �look pretty� will be a drastic cultural change and a tragic blow to those comfortable with the status quo, as well those unaccustomed to be held accountable �not to mention being charged with the task of actually having to think. Being �progressive� is daunting and yes, even �troublesome� for some, but when one takes into account the increase in the number of charter schools in the District (only a few of whom actually meet federal student-performance benchmarks), Fenty�s and Rhee�s initiatives represent a unique opportunity (if not a noble undertaking) to improve student performance rates and provide students in the District�the Nation�s Capital�with a world-class educat

137 agree | 122 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

8:31 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
When will Ms. Rhee announce the leadership team that she has assembled. There are people showing up but no one has been formally introduced, at least, to the employees in the trenches. Ms. Rhee couldn't tell the council what the duties of her transition team would be but she could give you the salary "range" not even the job title so I guess they will just "do what their supervisor tells them to." Millet is a whole different creature but he isn't the only parasite in the school system. Building moral is not a concern of these people even though Leadership 101 dictates a collaborative environment for effective change.

124 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

8:14 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Mike Licht said:
>Re: Drilling down in D.C. schools< Anonymous Examiner Reader: it is not that everyone in the central office of DCPS is an idiot or a crook but that the lack of rational structure wastes the talents of any of those people with experience and credentials you cite, so they cannot possibly serve as assets and help students. If an agency with so many Budget Analysts cannot spend Federal Grant funds legally or purchase textbooks on time, and a system with so many Curriculum Specialists cannot teach children, it is indeed time to clear out the central office and start over. The sooner the better.

551 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

6:57 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media portraying everyone in central office as an idiot or a crook. There are people at Central with experiences and credentials who are assets to the system and help students. In fact, due to the lack of communication from the Rhee administration to the current central office staff (perhaps based on their mistaken belief that all are incompetent) many excellent people who ARE employable in top jobs in the area are leaving. When will that story be told?!

143 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

11:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 25, 2007 re: "Jonetta Rose Barras: Dan Tangherlini: The wizard�s assistant"

Examiner Reader Ms. Betty Lewis said:
Why don't we let the court seperate the lies from the truth. Lanier moved to fast on her personal vendetta against the Commander. Bauman from the FOP is an idiot, Lanier assigns police and the cars and the bikes, not the Commander. We know that all the trashing of the Commander's reputation is coming out of Lanier's office, maybe the investigators that are working on the Commanders case will uncover the true reason that Lanier was picked for Chief, knowing that she is not the brightest star in the sky . Why has Lanier surrounded herself with Commanders and Assistant Chief that had domestic charges filed against them ?

431 agree | 185 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate