Senate candidates: The cream of the crop
Monday, we took a look at the most beautiful people vying to take their place in the House of Representatives next year.
| We couldn’t leave the Senate out, but we can tell you that the pickings were mighty slim. To begin with, there are only 33 Senate races this year, compared to 435 in the House, leaving the pool of potential head turners a bit thin. “Besides, none of them are hot anyway,” said Jessica Cutler, author of “The Washingtonienne.” Be that as it may, we’re offering up four candidates for your approval. | Online Poll Using WebSurveyor |
Rep. Harold Ford Jr. Democrat, Tennessee » Who is he?: Already serving in the House, the 36-year-old Ford now makes his first run for the Senate. “Harold is good looking,” says Erwin Gomez, beautician to the stars in D.C. and one of our resident experts. “I don’t know about his hair. ...” » Chances of seeing him in the Senate: 50/50. Ford is running neck-and-neck with opponent Bob Corker to fill Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist’s seat. | |
Dwight Grotberg Republican, North Dakota » Who is he?: Grotberg was raised on his parents’ farm in North Dakota and went on to study agriculture in college. He continues to ply the family trade. » Chances of seeing him in the Senate: Slim. Grotberg has managed to raise a meager $86,000 to his incumbent opponent Kent Conrad’s $5.9 million. The popular Conrad is expected to continue his winning streak by yet another large margin. | |
Tom Kean Jr. Republican, New Jersey » Who is he?: A former volunteer firefighter and EMT, Kean graduated from Dartmouth and now is serving in the New Jersey State Senate. Yet Gomez says, “We only have one Donald Trump in this world! You’re fired! You look too uptight.” » Chances of seeing him in the Senate: 50/50. Spending far less than Democratic incumbent Bob Menendez, Kean has managed to turn New Jersey into the GOP’s best chance of a pickup. | |
Rep. Mark Kennedy Republican, Minnesota » Who is he?: Kennedy is a fourth-generation resident of Minnesota, currently serving his third term as a congressman from the state’s 6th District. » Chances of seeing him in the Senate: Dwindling. Democratic nominee Amy Klobuchar is consistently scoring above 50 percent in the polls, with time running out for Kennedy. |
Figurine fetches big dough on eBay
Here’s a Mark Foley story that has legs. With trousers around its ankles.
Monday night, an enterprising artist named David Johnson of SpectreStudios in Denver hawked a “one of a kind” Mark Foley action figure for $315.01 on eBay.
The description states that the 6-inch tall figurine “is a sculptural mockup in polymer clay. [I]t is not articulated. ... This is the only one.”
Sporting gray hair, a pink shirt, dark suit and colorfully patterned boxers, the Foley mockup holds a BlackBerry in his right hand and a bottle of wine (we assume) in his left hand.
The box in which it comes states clearly “Warning: Not for Children.”
As of press time Monday night, 27 bidders had battled each other for the figurine, which opened at $19.99.
In other Foley news Monday — will it ever stop? — a release by Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays suggests that the former congressman should get himself into a “sexual reorientation” program, rather than alcohol rehab.
The group’s Executive Director Regina Griggs said due to childhood abuse, many men “like Mr. Foley … never had a chance to fulfill their heterosexual potential.”
Make it stop.
Shell Oil honcho denies price-fixing on his watch
Shell Oil President John Hofmeister on Monday dismissed any suggestion that oil prices have dropped to improve Republicans’ lot in November.
Speaking at the National Press Club, he said, “I really respond with a smile on that conspiracy theory. We would not talk to the White House about pricing. The prices are determined by the market. Do prices go back up after the election? We don’t predict prices.”
When asked “In 15 years ... what kind of gas will fuel your car?” Hofmeister spared no time in responding jokingly, “Why not a bicycle?”
Will Redbirds help Dems convert red states to blue ones?
Superstitious Democrats may be rooting for the St. Louis Cardinals this week. That’s because in midterm elections over the past 20 years, the outcome of the world series has been an almost-perfect predictor of the outcome at the ballot box.
Since 1978, when the National League team has won, Democrats have gained. When the American League team has won, Republicans have done better.
The only exception: 1998, when a historical anomaly (the impeachment of President Clinton and the Republicans’ bungled handling of it) coincided with a historical regularity (the Yankees winning the championship).
Speaking of which, we note that the Carpetbagger Curse is still alive and well. After winning three World Series in a row from 1998-2000, the Yankees have not won since Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., was elected after moving to the Empire State.
Similarly, when Robert F. Kennedy was elected to the Senate after moving to New York in 1964, the Bronx Bombers ended an impressive postseason run and went on a 12-year playoff drought.
Media mix
Spencer Abraham, the former Republican senator from Michigan and secretary of Energy, now heads the Abraham Group LLC, an international strategic consulting firm. This week, Abraham receives the Distinguished Achievement and Community Service Award from the René Moawad Foundation. We caught up with him via e-mail last week.
Q: What are you listening to on your iPod right now?
The Beach Boys
Q: What’s your favorite Web site?
www.realclearpolitics.com
Q: What book are you reading?
“Echo Park” by Michael Connelly
Q: What’s the last movie you saw?
“The Illusionist” and “Over the Hedge”
Q: What’s your favorite TV show?
“24”
Speakeasy
“Katherine Harris’s bid for the U.S. Senate bears more resemblance to a Monty Python skit than a campaign for high public office.” – An editorial in The Ledger of Lakeland, Fla.
Andrew White and Kelly Mahon contributed to this page.



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate