Multimedia News

Grammy Nominations Concert highlights
20 photos
Christina Aguilera arrives at 'The Grammy Nom...
Rockefeller Center Christmas tree lights up
20 photos
People look on from office windows as the Roc...
Celestial love triangle
20 photos
The crescent moon is accompanied by planets V...
Britney's back with new album, tour
20 photos
Singer Britney Spears performs on ABC's 'Good...
World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...

Md. senate race affected by Dem lead in governor’s race

Oct 21, 2006 2:00 AM (776 days ago) by Dena Levitz, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: Annapolis
Baltimore Mayor Martin O’Malley gives a speech at the University of Maryland. Political insiders say O’Malley’s strong lead in the gubernatorial race is having an impact on the outcome of Maryland’s senate race.
(John Shinkle/For The Examiner)
Baltimore Mayor Martin O’Malley gives a speech at the University of Maryland. Political insiders say O’Malley’s strong lead in the gubernatorial race is having an impact on the outcome of Maryland’s senate race.
Annapolis (Map, News) - New evidence that Martin O’Malley is chugging further ahead of Robert Ehrlich in the Maryland gubernatorial race could have a real impact on the senate race in that state, political insiders said Friday.

That O’Malley is gaining support lends credence to the notion that the Democrats are building a base that could likely transfer over to Democratic Congressman Ben Cardin excelling at the polls, according to Peter Shapiro, a University of Maryland political science professor.

And when Ehrlich’s numbers suffer — as a Thursday Zogby poll showed — so do those of his lieutenant governor Michael Steele, he added.

“People link — and appropriately so — Ehrlich with Steele, and the Democrats have worked hard to link the two of them with the president,” Shapiro noted. “This is as much a referendum on George Bush as anything.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

Steele’s strategy, in turn, has been to try to distance himself with the traditional Republican line and be seen as an independent thinker.

To an extent, Shapiro said, he is an independent thinker, yet also rather conservative on a number of social issues. How Democrats perceive the lieutenant governor and who turns out at the polls will make the difference while at the same time are hard to gauge, he explained.

“The short of it is that if Democrats vote for Democrats, Cardin will surely win,” Shapiro said. “But turnout will be a big key.”

In the last week,ww O’Malley and Ehrlich’s TV commercials have taken on a notably edgier, more confrontational tone. But for some time that’s been precisely the tone of Cardin’s and Steele’s ad wars, alluding to the competitive nature of the race, according to Shapiro.

The last Zogby poll concerning the Maryland Senate campaign from earlier this week has the Democratic representative ahead of the Republican lieutenant governor by about 8 percentage points.

As of the last campaign financial filings, Steele’s raised nearly $6.5 million, with about $2.1 million in cash on hand while his opponent has raised about $6.8 million, with $1.6 million in cash on hand.

Going into one of the final weekends before Nov. 7, both candidates have jam-packed schedules. Cardin is set to make appearances at a pro-choice fundraiser, gay rights dinner and — as Steele is — several religious communities.

dlevitz@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

11:17 AM MST on Sun., Nov. 30, 2008 re: "Some mull idea of Sen. Bill Clinton"

Susan deMaria said:
OMG..............PLEASE say it isn't so. Where is the change Obama promised? The Clintons are taking over before Jan. 20, 2009. American is really in trouble now.I spite of the awful politicans in DC; I hope God will continue to Bless American. One last thought!!!!! SHAME ON YOU "OBAMA". It will be hard for the Americans as well as the world who is in charge: Obama or Hil and Bill.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:14 PM MST on Thu., Nov. 27, 2008 re: "Some mull idea of Sen. Bill Clinton"

Examiner Reader said:
as a new york resident i think it's a wonderful idea..........................!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:51 PM MST on Sat., Nov. 22, 2008 re: "Some mull idea of Sen. Bill Clinton"

Examiner Reader said:
I am going to make a preliminary run on Hillary's seat. I am a NY health care provider and was grossly turned off by a lobbying incident with her 'health care liaison over a year ago. I am developing a blog this weekend titled HillarySenateseat.blogspot.com It will detail what we should be doing with this Senate seat, for NY and for the US and what she did and din't do... Dr. Noren

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:42 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 3, 2008 re: "Slots a top question mark for Md. Election Day"

Examiner Reader said:
we need slots, we do not need early voting , especially when you can demand an absentee ballot and then vote anywhere in the state. This ballot question gives a whole new meanig and truth to the saying "Vote Early & Vote Often! Why bother to have an election day when people can vote anytime they like.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:32 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 8, 2008 re: "Spokeswoman: Md. governor unlikely to extend absentee ballot voting deadline"

Examiner Reader said:
booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:36 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 30, 2008 re: "Convicted drug trafficker made large donations to Pr. George’s candidate"

John Q Public said:
Meir Duke IS a former felon, reformed or not. His prison record supports that. He has different businesses and properties in Maryland and other states. He is an arrogant and condescending person, typical of a wealthy but bitter ex-con. Do a litle research on the internet and you will find that he tried to have his prison sentence shortened by falsifying letters sent on his behalf by another prisoner representing Habitat for Humanity (not). Clever but also not very legal. Speaks volumes of his character. The hold ups in College Park were unfortunate but he provides no additional protection for his staff, to help with their fears. He has recently booted out the police substation in one of his shopping centers here in Baltimore. He refuses to give them the space needed to assist the community in lowering the crime in their area. His response is that "the police belong in cars, not in buildings" If he is ever held up in his store there, he will be the first to scream no protection

15 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:45 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 24, 2008 re: "Proposition A: Teachers get salary boost"

Examiner Reader said:
With the passage of Proposition A to increase property tax, who can I contact to determine if there will be a tax rebate program for relief for seniors?

14 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:36 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Proposition A: Teachers get salary boost"

Sam Kwong said:
Why is there no annual cap to the parcel tax? The District got $198 for each parcel of land, including one for each condominium. This tax will be applied to the thousands of new properties that will be built during the next 20 years. This appears to be an open checkbook for the School District to keep increasing the salary of the teachers without limit since the tax will be in place for 20 years. When the fact is that the School District is not expanding and the enrollment has been declining for the past 5 years why is a cap is not put in place because the salary budget should be relatively stable? In fact if enrollment continues to decline shouldn’t the tax be scaled back too? There should be an annual cap. When more new housing are built, the burden for the tax for each property owner should be reduced proportionally.

21 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:44 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008 re: "Proposition A: Teachers get salary boost"

Examiner Reader said:
Great on prop A...so now teachers get a 5K salary increase, but the SFUSD lottery school placement system stays the same, the union still keeps their reward for seniority rather than merit, the curriculum will remain the same, and the children are in the same bad school system! I wish I could give my $198 tax increase to the private school I will need to pay for now. Thanks voters!

21 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:43 PM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008 re: "Papan campaign earns scolding"

Examiner Reader said:
Gina Pappan seems very wooden and creepy. Big deal she's in the tank with Planned Parenthood, racists and socialists run the organization.

19 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:15 PM MST on Tue., May. 27, 2008 re: "Papan campaign earns scolding"

Examiner Reader said:
Jackie Speier has officially endorsed Jerry Hill for State Assembly.

16 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 PM MST on Mon., May. 26, 2008 re: "Papan campaign earns scolding"

Examiner Reader said:
Jackie must still be upset at Gina's late father. Sad.

18 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:35 PM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008 re: "Papan campaign earns scolding"

Albert Franklin said:
I did not note a word said that evens hint Papan ever thought it! One would think had those who brought this issue to the public's knowlege done anything spieresque, even they should be allowed to say what Papan is told not to draw conclusions to. Papan should be allowed to give voters an opportunity to make up their own minds about what they want, and that is what she did! How can opposition, void of doing anything politally creative, set back and accuse Papan of trying to invent her way into Sacramento when all she did is declare her intent if elected? To even suggest what Papan meant is beyond the pale of reason, and nullifies fair political elections by throwing out every issue Papan raises, as bad ideas! If it was such a poor act on her part, then maybe the opposition should show her in the press what in their estimation id exceptef for her to either do or say.

19 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:52 AM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008 re: "Familiar names file for Havre de Grace election"

Examiner Reader said:
This is an important election for me because I care what happens to downtown Havre de Grace. Does anyone know of candidates to vote for that would keep to the planning and zoning's mission statement, that is 'To perserve, protect and enhance the physical and built environment for its' historic heritage and for the properity of present and future generations ...'. Fred Cullum, Barry Anderson and others have recently publicly announced their support of the construction of a 4 story modern style 54 unit housing building. This building will share the same block with 8 existing residental homes. In addition only 27 parking spaces are being proposed in an area that is already challenging to park. Does anyone know which candidate would better support smart growth in Havre de Grace?

20 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:58 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008 re: "Nader taps former Supervisor Gonzalez for running mate"

Examiner Reader said:
For the record, Matt Gonzalez only narrowly lost to Gavin Newsom by 53-47 percent--not 43 percent, as your article states. And this was after being in the race for only 5 months. Democrat millionaire Newsom, meanwhile, had been campaigning for over a year (arguably two) and spent a whopping $6 million to the Green populist Gonzalez's impressive, but far more modest, $900,000.

29 agree | 28 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:31 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 re: "Some mull idea of Sen. Bill Clinton"

Examiner Reader said:
I still think Bill should be able to run again for president. He has been put of the white house for 8 years...We need him to lead again and bring us back to a balanced budget and take care of americans not Iraq's.

32 agree | 29 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 1, 2008 re: "Nader taps former Supervisor Gonzalez for running mate"

Examiner Reader said:
Right, Examiner Reader. Matt initially ran as a democrat, then quit in mid-election when he thought it would help him more in the Haight. After he lost for mayor, he quit even though he was the second most powerful political figure in SF, leaving no one except Chris Daly to call out Newsom on his many screw ups. Daly's lack of anger management made Newsom look better than he would have if Gonzalez had Cajones (spelling?)to stick around. I suspect Matt whored himself as a lawyer to build a political war chest on the backs of the SF taxpayers. Matt refused to run against Newsom in 2007 because he couldn't win(and he can win THIS?). No, Matt is running to elevate his political image. He is using Ralph, much like he has used the democrats and SF progressives in the past. If Nader truly wanted to elevate the debate, he could have supported Dennis Kuchinich, a more viable candidate who could have stayed in the race longer with more support.

85 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:56 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008 re: "Nader taps former Supervisor Gonzalez for running mate"

Examiner Reader said:
Whatever... Matt Gonzalez is a big baby quitter. He lived across the street from me and I actually voted for him for major, my 1st and probably last green vote. When he didn't win he just quit. Now whenever I see him I try to scream 'QUITTER' as loud as I can. He was head of the Board of Supes and actually could have made a difference and a name for greens. But no, he just quit. Now he gets to ruin the election so McCain is our president. He'd probably quit if he and Nader got elected too. Quitter. Quitter Quitter!!!

90 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:12 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008 re: "Nader taps former Supervisor Gonzalez for running mate"

Examiner Reader said:
Examinator, you are wrong. Matt Gonzalez, unlike Ralph Nader, has NO principals. He is only about himself. Matt ran for supervisor as a democrat, then jumped ship when he saw the democratic party affiliation wouldn't help further his political ambitions. He has been whoring himself as a lawyer to build a political war chest for a future run at Mayor. He was too much of a coward to run against Gavin (How I wish someone would have), and now he will use Ralph Nader as a springboard to become mayor of SF in a run against Aaron Peskin in 2012. The Irrelevant Party can make noise in SF which is fine. They will have no impact on the election. Most of their better ideas are stolen from the Democrats, and the rest are either communist, or are intended to fill their own pockets with cash from "publicly financed elections". The greens are different from the other parties, their just on the outside looking in.

82 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:49 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008 re: "Nader taps former Supervisor Gonzalez for running mate"

EXAMINATOR said:
Does any one even remember the name of Nader's previous running mate(s)? The Democrats are already blaming Nader and Gonzalez for losing an election that's eight months away. By then plenty of people outside San Francisco will know who Matt Gonzalez is and that he, like Nader, is a man of principle. The Examiner story quotes from local Democratic party hacks but doesn't even go to the trouble of finding any Gonzalez supporters of which there are plenty in San Francisco. Watching Democrats squirm at the mention of Nader and Gonzales brings a lot of people including myself glee but reading the veiled threats against Gonzalez political future demonstrates exactly why plenty of people will vote for him and Nader because they're NOT Democrats.

103 agree | 79 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:13 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008 re: "Nader taps former Supervisor Gonzalez for running mate"

Examiner Reader said:
Of course Matt Gonzalez is running for mayor! Peskin vs Gonzalez. This is merely a way to keep his name in print for the next couple of years. At least he isn't filing lawsuits against the city to fill his political coffers anymore.

74 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:08 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008 re: "Nader taps former Supervisor Gonzalez for running mate"

SF NATIVE said:
The problem with this is that my Green Party friends try to tell me there is no difference between the democrats and republicans. I beg to differ. Too bad they couldn't perceive the difference between Gore and Bush. Now, can't they tell the difference between Obama, Clinton and McCain? Is Obama "more of the same". I for one don't think so. While I agree on many of their positions, The Greens, and particularly Nader, are becoming political gadflies, the Wendell Wilkie adn Bull Moose party of our generation.

93 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:54 AM MST on Sat., Feb. 16, 2008 re: "Some mull idea of Sen. Bill Clinton"

Examiner Reader said:
Bill Clinton is an idiot who benefited from his doing absolutely almost nothing during a fundamentally quiet time nationally and internationally speaking. He did manage to drop 4 perfectly laser guided bombs on a Chinese Embassy, destroy our borders and economy with NAFTA and in the view of those of you who continually reality check themselves, would make a great Senator. We already have several hundred Demo Senators who have their heads up their A---s and neither do we need either or both Clintons in politics at the same time nor any longer. Popularity and hucksterism do not politician make -- That depends upon what "IS IS" Cut me a break, the Clintons need to be led out to pasture -- unless you want to start to scrutinize Hillarys malfeasance as BOTH a first lady, the worst our nation ever had; and as a Senator beginning with her lies regarding her campaign funds. Care to join my Netroots group? We are out to get the Clintons for their criminality!! Wake up okay?

157 agree | 122 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:20 AM MST on Sun., Feb. 10, 2008 re: "McCain wins big on Super Tuesday"

Examiner Reader said:
To the reporter who wrote this -- why did you describe Romney's campaign as "lackluster?" One year ago, no one knew who Romney was ... yet last Tuesday, he either beat McCain or came in just a few percentage points behind him in numerous states. Huckabee, meanwhile, won only the states where evangelical Christians are the Repulbican majority (which for him, was the equivalent of rounding up your relatives to vote for you.) Yet you choose to use the word "lackluster" to describe Romney's campaign? I'm a working journalist, so I know what it's like to work under tight deadlines. But deadlines are never an excuse for sloppy, sensational writing.

116 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:24 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 6, 2008 re: "San Franciscans vote in record numbers"

Examiner Reader said:
Can someone tell me why CNN, CBS and ABC projected that Clinton won in California when some polls (four in Northern California and two in Southern California) were still open. With them still open projections should not be put out on the radio and television until all polls in that state are closed.

130 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:48 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 6, 2008 re: "No clear winner in Clinton-Obama tug-of-war"

Examiner Reader said:
This is wrong. The article says "Clinton took the two biggest prizes, California and New York." Clinton did not "take" California. California is NOT a winner take all state. Most likely the two will spilt California delegates evenly (Obama may win more in the end).

135 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:04 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 31, 2007 re: "Life is good in Ward 3, but challenges await new council member"

Lefteris said:
Cool.

249 agree | 230 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:00 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007 re: "Candidate says he will sue over ‘slanderous statement’"

Jeannette said:
The Eric Bouchat I knew was always a kind and considerate person. To say someone never have trouble in a marriage or in life for that matter would be a falsehood. In this case, Eric's life is out in the open. I did look at the court records and it seems that the wife was a bit on the aggressive side also. It sounded like a bad marriage, so go ahead and cast the first stone. Signed, Jeannette (Pfannenstiel) Gover St Louis, MO

465 agree | 501 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement