Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. (Map, News) - A short week means the Virginia football team has little time to dwell on two stunning defeats in a row. With five losses already, the young and inexperienced Cavaliers’ do-or-die stretch is now, not in November, as it was anticipated before the season began.
“It certainly has put the challenge on a lot of guys all at once that this isn’t a ripen-on-the-vine deal,” said Virginia head coach Al Groh. “As much as they can and all of us can expedite the process will be a big factor in how fast we get to playing the kind of ball that we’re used to playing around here.”
After losing veterans in key positions on both offense and defense last season, this year the Cavaliers have only four seniors that are seeing a prominent amount of minutes every game. A plethora of new starters might have thought they could coast, but this season’s trials have come early and often, forcing younger players to mature faster than they would’ve otherwise.
“People were saying at the beginning of the season that we were young, that we were expected to make some mistakes and things like that,” said linebacker Clint Sintim (Gar-Field High). “We are making mistakes, and we are a young team, but at the same time, I feel as though being young doesn’t mean necessarily that you have to act like a young player or that you have to perform like one.”
Sintim is a sophomore, but in his second year as a starter, he’s the one with experience who’s leading by example, playing every game like it’s his last.
“I don’t consider myself a young guy at all. Although this is my second year on the field, I’ve been here for three years. I understand the roles, I understand how things go, and I understand what’s expected of me,” he said. “I don’t think I have the luxury of assuming the young guy role.”
Despite a steady stream of criticism, Sintim said the Cavaliers remains unified in their support of Groh.
“We put all our faith in coach Groh. Coach Groh, I think he’s a great coach, he’s never steered us wrong. Even during tough times, we still put our faith in our coach,” said Sintim. “The thing about this team, our guys stick together. Our guys stay in tune with one another, and we support each other even when we’re down.”
Whether it was the improved play against Maryland from freshman quarterback Jameel Sewell and the offense, which moved the ball better than it had all season, to the savvy interception and return from senior cornerback Marcus Hamilton, the entire program is clutching at straws, anything and everything they can to build upon for this season and next.
“We played a lot closer to playing well and still losing [against the Terrapins]. When you do that, there’s a lot of disappointment that goes with the result, particularly when you say ‘Jeez, we had enough good plays that we could’ve won,’ ” said Groh. “The players have good reason to feel positive about themselves — not happy, there’s a good difference between it — not happy, but positive.”



Comments from Examiner Readers
7:15 AM MST on Mon., Sep. 24, 2007 re: "Is this the beginning of the end?"
Report as inappropriate
6:11 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007
re: "Bay Area schools only now tapping pipeline"
Report as inappropriate
12:48 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 14, 2007
re: "Bay Area schools only now tapping pipeline"
Report as inappropriate
7:04 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 22, 2007
re: "Terps QB situation unsettled"
Report as inappropriate
1:54 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007
re: "Terps QB situation unsettled"
Report as inappropriate
10:44 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
5:07 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
12:46 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
6:06 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
6:24 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
5:01 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
4:55 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
9:25 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
5:44 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
3:46 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Freshmen could play critical role for Midshipmen"
Report as inappropriate
10:47 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
10:43 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Navy mulls potential conference move"
Report as inappropriate
10:18 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007
re: "Recruits ready to make commitments official"
Report as inappropriate
10:52 AM MST on Tue., May. 1, 2007
re: "Logan-El headed to Towson"
Report as inappropriate
7:56 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 21, 2007
re: "Transfer springs to action for depleted Terps"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Ryan for the Heisman! Go BC!
295 agree | 310 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
nice Stadium but wheres the team? said:
Stanforrd lost their best hoops coach in the late 80's due to the school's inability to admit legitimate recruits that where academically eligible. now as i look at that joke of a football squad they run out there year in and year out i wonder why they dont recruit the best talent around. ccsf would give the cardinal a run for their money right now. jimmy vegas says ccsf (+7).
282 agree | 285 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
moreNcsarecoming said:
Joe Ayoob...enough said. Loved Hawkins comment about the education at CCSF and Berkley. Same as usual or something like that. No wonder Stanford doesn't want JC players - or Berkley ones!
299 agree | 298 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Terps Who?? said:
Doesn't matter because on September 1, you go down to the Villanova Wildcats!!!
298 agree | 296 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Josh POrtis is by far the best option at QB for the Terps. I've seen all three throughout the summer and Steffy knows the offense more but is just plain limited in ability. Turner is a bookworm with signal calling but is only good on the field between the 20's. He can't complete drives. Portis has trumendous athletic ability and instincts and a trumendous arm for such a shifty signal caller. He is your long term solution to get Maryland where they need to go. Steffy and Turner guaruntee you a .500 mediocre season....bet that!
392 agree | 288 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I agree with the posters above. The implication that the ACC is superior at all, much less far superior to the Big East (as things currently stand), is completely BANANAS and undermines the credibility of this otherwise well written piece, IMHO. The ACC hasn't won a BCS game since 1999 whereas the Big East was 32-8 OOC last year and has won its past two BCS games.
336 agree | 219 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So ACC teams are superior to Navy, while you imply that Big East teams are not? Navy would be ranked 8th or 9th in a nine-team Big East. Remember, Navy lost by 1 point to Boston College, and by 34 to Rutgers. Geeze...
267 agree | 259 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's forget for a second that I'm an angry Big East fan. Boston College, who finished second in the Atlantic Division of the ACC (right behind Wake) needed a last-second lucky turnover and field goal with no time left to beat Navy (BY ONE POINT!!!) in their bowl game this past year. Where do you get off saying "The ACC is filled with football teams superior to Navy's." ???
309 agree | 326 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
That comment about the ACC being better than the BE is ludicrous. How long does the BE have to be better before people wake up. Without going into top-bottom details wouldn't the fact that the BE top teams beat the ACC top teams in 2 bowl games last year be enough to spur you to at least do a little research? The ACC and Big 12 were clearly the worst 2 conferences last year - it is not even debateable. If you look at all OOC results and work your way from top to bottom (Sagarin rankings). The BE had a .500 winning @ against teams ranked in the top 47. For the ACC to reach a .500 winning % you have to include teams all the way down to 119! Please do a little research.
349 agree | 256 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I echo what the first poster said. What cave have you been living in for the past two years, Mr Snyder? Do you REALLY think the ACC is superior to the Big East in football? How much did John Swofford pay you to put that paragraph in there?
361 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"The Atlantic Coast Conference is filled with football teams superior to Navy’s." Huh? If the Big East were a viable option, why wouldn't the ACC? Check out the Big East/ACC head-to-head match ups from last season.
354 agree | 328 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a Navy fan, i certainly dont want to be in a confernce with the likes of toledo, kent st, and buffalo. I'd rather hold the course were on right now..ask army, they bolted cusa........
285 agree | 257 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Airforce is that good?........since when????
301 agree | 260 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Andrew C. Dahmen said:
Army and Navy should join the Sun Belt conference, Army could join the MAC. It will not happen however what would be great is to have Air Force in the same conference as Army and Navy, the Sun Belt would work but Air Force is way to good.
312 agree | 285 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
NIU Huskie said:
Navy should secure a tie-in with the MAC. MAC teams aren't that far away and there are two (Temple and Buffalo) that are closer than the Sun Belt schools. The Sun Belt's #2 school wouldn't be a very competitive or interesting (national TV crowd) game.
353 agree | 247 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If the QB spot has consistency and the defensive backfield learns quickly, Navy will have an excellent year.
271 agree | 284 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
One potential short-term answer for Navy is a playing in a new bowl game in Baltimore in December of 2008. The Camden Yards Sports and Entertainment Commission considers Navy a prime candidate for the game, according to Wayne Edwards, the commission’s sports committee chairman. Sign an agreement with the Sun Belt for their 3'rd place team to play the Navy annually. Good deal for both.
428 agree | 311 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Sun Belt would be perfect. The Navy and Sun Belt are recruiting comparable players today and have two bowl committments. 1) The New Orleans Bowl, 2) A second Bowl has been added effective 2009. The Sun Belt is making a major push to upgrade it conference. Over the next few years we will see an increased number of OOC wins. Sounds like a win-win situation.
261 agree | 368 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Kyle Barker from CCSF won't be going anywhere because he didn't make grades in the spring.
503 agree | 422 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Go Tigers
496 agree | 493 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I live locally and have been attending some of the practices. Josh Portis is the best fit for our offense I've watched this kid and he is everything folks have said he is. Go Terps.
555 agree | 455 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree