Jonetta Rose Barras: Governing begins
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Jim Gibson, the former head of the D.C. Agenda, and others predicted in 1994 that Marion Barry could be elected mayor but would be unable to govern. Barry’s tainted past, the city’s fiscal woes, and a Congress with no patience for the executive’s infamous shenanigans collaborated to deny him a full political resurrection.

D.C. Council Member Adrian Fenty, who defeated Council Chairman Linda Cropp to win the Democratic mayoral nomination, doesn’t carry Barry’s burdens. Still, there are questions about whether he will be able to govern.

He faces forces similar to those Anthony Williams confronted when he was elected mayor in 1998: Legislators who are openly hostile, criticizing his style, intellect and experience. Further, Vincent Gray, who won the Democratic nomination for council chairman with 57 percent of the vote, brings equal political weight. The legislature is likely to test Fenty early and often.

“I welcome the challenge,” Fenty says during an interview Wednesday at his campaign headquarters, quickly adding some of the criticism was “just election heat.”

Still, he’s already building relationships with new members — Democratic nominees in Ward 6, Tommy Wells, and in Ward 5, Harry Thomas Jr. He’s identifying his successor to run in next year’s special election. He plans to speak with Gray about his Ward 7 replacement.

“There’s an opportunity for a whole new dynamic,” Fenty says. “As mayor, I will put council members out front and give them the accolades as along as at the end of the day we’re getting things done; that’s what I am going to be judged by.”

The 35-year-old pol also will encounter an obstinate government bureaucracy that believes it can wait out any elected leader and/or sabotage any and all reform efforts.

Then, there is the fickle electorate, salivating for change, but when fed, trashes the chef. These forces are expected to surface when Fenty announces his Cabinet in November and lobbies for control of D.C. Public Schools.

“There were a lot of mandates in this election. [Fixing the schools] was definitely at the top,” he says, acknowledging Williams’ two failed attempts.

He wants to invite New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and School Chancellor Joel Klein to speak with council members. He thinks it will be tough for lawmakers to ignore that city’s achievements.

“You can’t fix [the school system] unless you take it over,” he says. “You can barely fix a bathroom unless you take it over.”

True. Still, Fenty may want to heed Williams’ advice when meeting the council as brick wall: “Galvanize and harness that electoral win to bring out an army in pursuit of the change you’re seeking.”

Translation: Keep a well-oiled political machine on the ready.

Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for WAMU radio’s D.C. “Politics Hour with Kojo and Jonetta.”

Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Lisa said:
Do a grammar check -- you have a who/whom problem in the first sentence of the 6th paragraph. Are there no editors around?

121 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:52 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Barras, Please stop straddling the fence!!! One minute you are heralding Rhee as the best thing since slice bread and now you speak the truth...A woman WITHOUT a Plan

112 agree | 124 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader SL said:
This article truly addressed the major issue that continues to cripple the school system and drive highly qualified teachers from educating in the district. There is an urgent need for accountability starting all the way from the top. Without significant changes, it we will only be like a bandaid being placed over an infected wound.

214 agree | 216 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:01 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Right...tell me another one said:
You know this is not going to be popular, but although Janey had the rights ideas on curriculum, you swear he was a paid consultant and never managed staff. He did not set a mission, did not review employees based on if they lived up to the mission even his own Declaration of Education and for that reason did a disservice to those who are/were talented in central office. Because he failed to set the tone. After awhile the bullies would take hold. The people who were in their cars at 5:01pm, and took Friday's off as they "worked from home" all week. He fired maybe one person--whose work was such an embarassment --she was barely literate and was asked not to return by a parents group. Her position Head of Communications. (I could not make this up). But who were talented, head of accountability, deputy business officer, community liaison all left when they were great talents.

253 agree | 234 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:42 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately Assistant Superintendent Francisco Millet's story is common in the District of Columbia Public Schools. I can name another Assistant Superintendent who shares his style and attempts to intimidate teachers.

251 agree | 248 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Karen Dickerson said:
The earnest attention being paid to the current state of the DCPS is long overdue and much welcomed. Many residents undoubtedly applaud the sweeping reforms Chancellor Rhee and the Mayor plan to institute and recognize that not everyone in the system is inept, an idiot, or even a crook. Going beyond simply making it “look pretty” will be a drastic cultural change and a tragic blow to those comfortable with the status quo, as well those unaccustomed to be held accountable –not to mention being charged with the task of actually having to think. Being “progressive” is daunting and yes, even “troublesome” for some, but when one takes into account the increase in the number of charter schools in the District (only a few of whom actually meet federal student-performance benchmarks), Fenty’s and Rhee’s initiatives represent a unique opportunity (if not a noble undertaking) to improve student performance rates and provide students in the District—the Nation’s Capital—with a world-class educat

275 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:31 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
When will Ms. Rhee announce the leadership team that she has assembled. There are people showing up but no one has been formally introduced, at least, to the employees in the trenches. Ms. Rhee couldn't tell the council what the duties of her transition team would be but she could give you the salary "range" not even the job title so I guess they will just "do what their supervisor tells them to." Millet is a whole different creature but he isn't the only parasite in the school system. Building moral is not a concern of these people even though Leadership 101 dictates a collaborative environment for effective change.

237 agree | 257 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Mike Licht said:
>Re: Drilling down in D.C. schools< Anonymous Examiner Reader: it is not that everyone in the central office of DCPS is an idiot or a crook but that the lack of rational structure wastes the talents of any of those people with experience and credentials you cite, so they cannot possibly serve as assets and help students. If an agency with so many Budget Analysts cannot spend Federal Grant funds legally or purchase textbooks on time, and a system with so many Curriculum Specialists cannot teach children, it is indeed time to clear out the central office and start over. The sooner the better.

748 agree | 227 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:57 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media portraying everyone in central office as an idiot or a crook. There are people at Central with experiences and credentials who are assets to the system and help students. In fact, due to the lack of communication from the Rhee administration to the current central office staff (perhaps based on their mistaken belief that all are incompetent) many excellent people who ARE employable in top jobs in the area are leaving. When will that story be told?!

256 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 25, 2007 re: "Jonetta Rose Barras: Dan Tangherlini: The wizard’s assistant"

Examiner Reader Ms. Betty Lewis said:
Why don't we let the court seperate the lies from the truth. Lanier moved to fast on her personal vendetta against the Commander. Bauman from the FOP is an idiot, Lanier assigns police and the cars and the bikes, not the Commander. We know that all the trashing of the Commander's reputation is coming out of Lanier's office, maybe the investigators that are working on the Commanders case will uncover the true reason that Lanier was picked for Chief, knowing that she is not the brightest star in the sky . Why has Lanier surrounded herself with Commanders and Assistant Chief that had domestic charges filed against them ?

569 agree | 342 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)