Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
But it will be when Janelia Farm — a $500 million, 689-acre state-of-the-art research campus — opens in October.
The facility will be dedicated to the study of fundamental biological questions that could lead to cures for some of the world’s most challenging diseases.
“They’ve never created an intellectual powerhouse like this before,” said Larry Rosenstrauch, director of economic development for Loudoun County. “It’s like having a cross between Harvard Medical School and an MIT. If somebody were to plot a line between MIT and Harvard with those smart people, what kind of impact do you think it will have? It will be huge.”
Janelia Farm, which was conceptualized and funded by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, headquartered in Chevy Chase, will bring 300 scientists from around the world to Northern Virginia, all looking for breakthroughs in the multi-billion-dollar biotech industry.
The arrival of Janelia Farm, in addition to the region’s already strong research and development infrastructure, more working scientists than anywhere else in the country, and millions of federal, state and private dollars being pumped into the growing industry, puts Washington in a position to become a leader in the biotechnology race.
Biotechnology companies apply the study of genetic and biological processes to develop commercial products and services. For example, multiple drug treatments and medical devices that grew out of biotech research are already on the market, and hundreds more are in clinical trials.
At Janelia Farm, scientists will focus on two main areas of biomedical research: examining how information is processed by neuronal circuits, which is essentially the study of how the brain interacts with the body; and the development of imaging technologies and computational methods for image analysis.
Combining the two would allow scientists to study human functions using cutting-edge computer analysis, said Gerald Rubin, vice president and director of Janelia Farm, and could one day lead to cures for diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
Biotechnology is hot right now not only because it might hold the key to eradicating disease, but also because it holds the promise of hundreds of billions of dollars in profits, and that has every region in the U.S. jockeying for the top spot.
“We believe this is a high-growth industry,” said Steven Pedigo, research manager with the Greater Washington Initiative, an organization that markets the region to biotech companies.
In fact, the industry already has grown significantly in the Washington area in the past 25 years and impacted the local economy.
Today, the region is home to 83 biotechnology companies, up from just 13 in 1980.
Between 1990 and 1999, Washington secured more than 2,000 biotech-related patents — a popular benchmark for judging an industry’s commercial viability. That figure is nearly five times that of the previous decade.
Though the region competes with other major bioscience regions — such as leaders Boston and San Francisco — for federal research funds, many of the dollars do make their way to Washington-area laboratories.
And with the addition of Janelia Farm, the Washington region is set to capture an even bigger share of the bioscience industry.
“It’s the single-largest science investment of the decade and it will probably have the most impact for [Virginia] maybe for decades to come,” Rosenstrauch said. “We have to recognize this is a global asset that has landed in our region and we have to try and use it.”
How does Washington compare to other top biotechnology clusters in the U.S.?
Here are a few regions of the country with recognized biotech industries:
Washington
Number of biotech companies: 83
Venture capital investments (1995-2001): $85 million
Biotechnology-related patents (1975-’99): 2,753
NIH funding for local medical schools (2000): $678,905
Philadelphia
Number of biotech companies: 46
Venture capital investments in biopharmaceuticals (1995-2001): $458 million
Biotechnology-related patents (1975-’99): 5,202
NIH funding for local medical schools (2000): $432,414
Raleigh, N.C.
Number of biotech companies: 72
Venture capital investments in biopharmaceuticals (1995-2001): $380 million
Biotechnology-related patents (1975-’99): 1,027
NIH funding for local medical schools (2000): $440,954
New York
Number of biotech companies: 127
Venture capital investments in biopharmaceuticals (1995-2001): $639 million
Biotechnology-related patents (1975-’99): 11,810
NIH funding for local medical schools (2000): $763,492
Boston
Number of biotech companies: 141
Venture capital investments in biopharmaceuticals (1995-2001): $1.915 billion
Biotechnology-related patents (1975-’99): 3,725
NIH funding for local medical schools (2000): $499,825
San Francisco
Number of biotech companies: 152
Venture capital investments in biopharmaceuticals (1995-2001): $3 billion
Biotechnology-related patents (1975-1999): 5,578
NIH funding for local medical schools (2000): $473,463
Source: “Signs of Life: The Growth of Biotechnology Centers in the U.S.” Report from The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy
kwilmeth@dcexaminer.com


Comments from Examiner Readers
12:44 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 29, 2008 re: "Schools to lease land for phone towers"
Report as inappropriate
3:39 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 7, 2008
re: "Where being a nerd is cool"
Report as inappropriate
1:21 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 7, 2008
re: "Cities exploring high-tech ways to save on cash"
Report as inappropriate
10:34 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008
re: "Computer specialist locks city out"
Report as inappropriate
11:04 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008
re: "Brisbane to gauge baylands wind flow"
Report as inappropriate
11:46 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008
re: "Defense, technology firms’ needs make Baltimore the place to be for IT positions"
Report as inappropriate
11:07 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 24, 2008
re: "U.Md. study shows MBAs lead to higher salaries in IT sector"
Report as inappropriate
7:34 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 13, 2008
re: "Businesses, educators agree they must unite to address tech job shortage"
Report as inappropriate
10:17 AM MST on Fri., May. 11, 2007
re: "Schools to lease land for phone towers"
Report as inappropriate
9:26 AM MST on Fri., May. 11, 2007
re: "Schools to lease land for phone towers"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Hi this is Nilesh Pund Plz send me information about how take land for tower by company {in short}on my e-mail pund2007@rediffmail.com
29 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Really, we're [game developers] pretty sick of being called "Nerds" by the media; it's a ridiculous characterization. I doubt you'd use the same kinda of language when discussing race or gender. I.e "where being a Ni**** is cool" or "where being a bi*** is cool."
30 agree | 29 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
san carlos removed the only person that was earning her salary. REMOVE THE EMBEZZLING OFFICIALS !
53 agree | 28 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
We know who, we know where, we kind of know how, and we get an idea of when... but why did he do this?
32 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wind turbines certainly generate clean energy (preferrable), but I wish leaders would allocate some of their design engineers to study how to protect the wildlife (birds) fatalities. It seems easy enough to place a cage around the turbines, just like the smaller, domestic models that protect children from getting their fingers clipped by the fan blades. I'm sure there's a way to make this look attractive in a super-size turbine.
37 agree | 37 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Dice Report. “Baltimore-Washington has the third-highest average salary for IT professionals at $81,750 a year, ahead of the national average of $74,570.” WOW and yet the jobs which I applied for are paying way below the average. Usually a company asked what salary range I'm looking for, and usually that's a sign of we can't afford you. I answered negotiable, they pursuit for a number. When I give them a number I don't hear from them. Most of the positions I come across are bombarded with responsibilities and has a failure of matching the pay.
38 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Terence said:
What the article failed to address is that if you have an a non-business major and have an engineering or computer science degree, it is advisable to pursue an MBA degree and as such you would tend to pursue something like an IT degree and in that case, the jump in salary is significant. If you have a business undergrad in IT and pursue an MBA, that jump is significantly less. I still do not understand why students would do both an undergrad and grad in business. Really the textbooks are almost the same, the delivery is the difference. In some cases, classes are cross-taught at both the undergrad and grad. Pursuing a masters of science in marketing, operations and IT is the appropriate route not an MBA for undegrad in business. Just IMHO
39 agree | 37 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Iconic Xer. said:
I find this story missing a critical and informative element. Sure, tech companies and institutions such as NASA may be losing *employees* to retirement. But that doesn't mean there aren't *lots* of tech professionals around. Quite the opposite. There's an abundance of them. Companies have got to change their cultures, compensation and engagement of workers to be in alignment with the preference of many tech professionals to work outside of organizations, to work for multiple companies, to be flexible, nimble and not dependent on one industry or company for survival. It's a generational thing, really, with your GenXers (27-47 in 2008) heavily leaning in this direction. Re: the lack of kids entering STEM. It has nothing to do with them not wanting to be cool. They are achievement, affluence and team-oriented. Sing their song and they'll come in droves. Sing *your* song & they won't hear you ... or even bother trying. And, mistakenly, you'll conclude they're not interested. What
37 agree | 37 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Possible health risk of cancer too! See international studies.
449 agree | 506 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You can't stop it now and usually there is a reason its done that way
510 agree | 492 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree