Examiner.com // 15 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 2 hrs 23 mins ago
ABC7.com // 2 hrs 43 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 3 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
Examiner.com // 3 hrs ago
Daily News // 4 hrs ago
Daily News // 4 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 4 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 5 hrs ago
 
   
Jonetta Rose Barras: The right moves, the right vision
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The contentious D.C. mayor’s race is receiving most of the attention, but the council and congressional contests aren’t slouching toward irrelevancy. The campaigns to replace incumbents or retiring members have been pure political feasts.

The pickings are finest in the competition for council chairman. Two remarkable people — Ward 7’s Vincent Gray and Ward 3’s Kathy Patterson — are vying to lead the legislature. I wish they weren’t opposing each other; both have been consequential players in constructing a new D.C.

Gray is known best for his advocacy on behalf of poor and disadvantaged residents. He was the director of Covenant House Washington; he didn’t just create and manage that organization, he also built a multimillion-dollar facility in Southeast where troubled teens can receive crucial support. He served as director of the Department of Human Services during Sharon Pratt Kelly’s administration. He joined the legislature in 2005, elected by voters tired of a previous representative who thought constituent services an alien concept.

Patterson has served three terms. Stellar results mark her entire tenure. She persuaded her colleagues to fight against the threat of toxic chemicals riding through the city in railcars. She forced the Metropolitan Police Department to create a homicide victims unit, and later, to reform its first amendment-breaking ways. She repeatedly pushed for improvements in public schools. Tough and tenacious, she has been quite effective gathering seven votes to advance her legislative agenda — some of which, like that ghastly nanny anti-smoking bill, I have blasted.

There really isn’t a significant gap on the issues between Gray and Patterson. But the chairman doesn’t just push legislation. The position is managerial.

Patterson understood this years ago. Soon after joining the legislature, she advocated creating a joint council staff that would serve all members, ensuring a greater level of professionalism. A consolidated budget office was the result. Patterson says, if elected, she also wants shared research and policy staff to help lawmakers keep up with best practices implemented by other municipalities.

Hallelujah! How many times have we sat through dumb statements by council members who simply were ignorant about an issue or couldn’t grasp the finer points of a complicated discussion?

Gray has made important contributions in the short time that he has been on the council. Luckily, if his bid fails, he won’t have to leave the legislature. He doesn’t have to run again for his ward seat until 2008. Patterson, unfortunately, is another story.

Patterson’s superior record, command of the legislative process, extensive knowledge about the District government and sharp political skills evaluated within the context of the city’s future make her invaluable and the right choice for chairman. One added benefit: A vote for her places residents in the proverbial and enviable position of eating their cake and having it, too.

Sweet.

Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for WAMU radio’s “D.C. Politics Hour with Kojo and Jonetta.” She can be reached at rosebook1@aol.com.

Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Lisa said:
Do a grammar check -- you have a who/whom problem in the first sentence of the 6th paragraph. Are there no editors around?

120 agree | 108 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:52 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Barras, Please stop straddling the fence!!! One minute you are heralding Rhee as the best thing since slice bread and now you speak the truth...A woman WITHOUT a Plan

111 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader SL said:
This article truly addressed the major issue that continues to cripple the school system and drive highly qualified teachers from educating in the district. There is an urgent need for accountability starting all the way from the top. Without significant changes, it we will only be like a bandaid being placed over an infected wound.

213 agree | 215 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:01 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Right...tell me another one said:
You know this is not going to be popular, but although Janey had the rights ideas on curriculum, you swear he was a paid consultant and never managed staff. He did not set a mission, did not review employees based on if they lived up to the mission even his own Declaration of Education and for that reason did a disservice to those who are/were talented in central office. Because he failed to set the tone. After awhile the bullies would take hold. The people who were in their cars at 5:01pm, and took Friday's off as they "worked from home" all week. He fired maybe one person--whose work was such an embarassment --she was barely literate and was asked not to return by a parents group. Her position Head of Communications. (I could not make this up). But who were talented, head of accountability, deputy business officer, community liaison all left when they were great talents.

252 agree | 233 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:42 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately Assistant Superintendent Francisco Millet's story is common in the District of Columbia Public Schools. I can name another Assistant Superintendent who shares his style and attempts to intimidate teachers.

250 agree | 247 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Karen Dickerson said:
The earnest attention being paid to the current state of the DCPS is long overdue and much welcomed. Many residents undoubtedly applaud the sweeping reforms Chancellor Rhee and the Mayor plan to institute and recognize that not everyone in the system is inept, an idiot, or even a crook. Going beyond simply making it “look pretty” will be a drastic cultural change and a tragic blow to those comfortable with the status quo, as well those unaccustomed to be held accountable –not to mention being charged with the task of actually having to think. Being “progressive” is daunting and yes, even “troublesome” for some, but when one takes into account the increase in the number of charter schools in the District (only a few of whom actually meet federal student-performance benchmarks), Fenty’s and Rhee’s initiatives represent a unique opportunity (if not a noble undertaking) to improve student performance rates and provide students in the District—the Nation’s Capital—with a world-class educat

274 agree | 227 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:31 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
When will Ms. Rhee announce the leadership team that she has assembled. There are people showing up but no one has been formally introduced, at least, to the employees in the trenches. Ms. Rhee couldn't tell the council what the duties of her transition team would be but she could give you the salary "range" not even the job title so I guess they will just "do what their supervisor tells them to." Millet is a whole different creature but he isn't the only parasite in the school system. Building moral is not a concern of these people even though Leadership 101 dictates a collaborative environment for effective change.

236 agree | 256 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Mike Licht said:
>Re: Drilling down in D.C. schools< Anonymous Examiner Reader: it is not that everyone in the central office of DCPS is an idiot or a crook but that the lack of rational structure wastes the talents of any of those people with experience and credentials you cite, so they cannot possibly serve as assets and help students. If an agency with so many Budget Analysts cannot spend Federal Grant funds legally or purchase textbooks on time, and a system with so many Curriculum Specialists cannot teach children, it is indeed time to clear out the central office and start over. The sooner the better.

747 agree | 226 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:57 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media portraying everyone in central office as an idiot or a crook. There are people at Central with experiences and credentials who are assets to the system and help students. In fact, due to the lack of communication from the Rhee administration to the current central office staff (perhaps based on their mistaken belief that all are incompetent) many excellent people who ARE employable in top jobs in the area are leaving. When will that story be told?!

255 agree | 238 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 25, 2007 re: "Jonetta Rose Barras: Dan Tangherlini: The wizard’s assistant"

Examiner Reader Ms. Betty Lewis said:
Why don't we let the court seperate the lies from the truth. Lanier moved to fast on her personal vendetta against the Commander. Bauman from the FOP is an idiot, Lanier assigns police and the cars and the bikes, not the Commander. We know that all the trashing of the Commander's reputation is coming out of Lanier's office, maybe the investigators that are working on the Commanders case will uncover the true reason that Lanier was picked for Chief, knowing that she is not the brightest star in the sky . Why has Lanier surrounded herself with Commanders and Assistant Chief that had domestic charges filed against them ?

568 agree | 341 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)