Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The candidates voters faced back then included several D.C. Council members, most notably Ward 7’s Kevin Chavous. He was poised to become mayor after Barry declined to run for reelection. But citizens concluded that electing Chavous would mean more of the same. So, they reached for Anthony Williams–then the city’s chief financial officer.
A nerdy guy satisfied with balance sheets, birds and canoes, Williams was a “new style” black leaders. (I have been writing since the early 1990s about folks like Detroit's former mayor Dennis Archer, Cleveland, Ohio’s former mayor Michael White, Tennessee Congressman Harold Ford, Jr.)
These new leaders are competent, savvy, professionals, who combine corporate acumen with street smarts and political sophistication. Not unlike Adrian Fenty, they demonstrate a mastery of technology and comfort in a world without rants and divisive racialism. They move with ease in multicultural environments and are the realization of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream. They meet the future with excellence and substance-not symbolism.
During that 1998 race, Williams was cast as villain: He didn't care about the elderly because he once tried to cut the budget of the Office on Aging. He didn't care about workers because he had the audacity to fire under-performers. He didn't know the city because he couldn't recite the boundary lines for each of the eight wards. He was a numbers cruncher who didn't know his head from the highway.
Still, District residents elected him, turning away from the past political culture to begin sculpting a new era.
While there have been moments of discomfort between Williams and some constituents, a recent poll indicating a 54 percent approval rating after nearly eight years and a huge battle over a baseball stadium affirms residents satisfaction. (Sharon Pratt Kelly won only 13 percent of the votes in her reelection bid. When Barry stepped down his numbers were only slightly better.)
A passing generation — epitomized by council Chairman Linda Cropp — finds it difficult to leave the stage. Sometimes they engage in distortions that border on lies to remain the center of attention. Fear fuels these worries and actions. Meanwhile, a community's progress can be stunted.
District voters again must decide which political culture to embrace: one steeped in the past, polished daily by individuals who use empty rhetoric and racial codes to demonize and divide, without providing a vision for economic, social or educational advancement. Or, one that reaffirms their earlier desire to be led by a new style politician, who possesses integrity and an unbreakable moral compass while moving with decisiveness, agility, and sophistication further into the 21st century.
Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for WAMU radio’s D.C. “Politics Hour with Kojo and Jonetta.”


Comments from Examiner Readers
7:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"
Report as inappropriate
2:52 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008
re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"
Report as inappropriate
5:39 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007
re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"
Report as inappropriate
3:01 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007
re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"
Report as inappropriate
7:42 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"
Report as inappropriate
5:36 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"
Report as inappropriate
8:31 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"
Report as inappropriate
8:14 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"
Report as inappropriate
6:57 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007
re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"
Report as inappropriate
11:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 25, 2007
re: "Jonetta Rose Barras: Dan Tangherlini: The wizard’s assistant"
Report as inappropriate
Lisa said:
Do a grammar check -- you have a who/whom problem in the first sentence of the 6th paragraph. Are there no editors around?
123 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Barras, Please stop straddling the fence!!! One minute you are heralding Rhee as the best thing since slice bread and now you speak the truth...A woman WITHOUT a Plan
114 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader SL said:
This article truly addressed the major issue that continues to cripple the school system and drive highly qualified teachers from educating in the district. There is an urgent need for accountability starting all the way from the top. Without significant changes, it we will only be like a bandaid being placed over an infected wound.
216 agree | 218 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Right...tell me another one said:
You know this is not going to be popular, but although Janey had the rights ideas on curriculum, you swear he was a paid consultant and never managed staff. He did not set a mission, did not review employees based on if they lived up to the mission even his own Declaration of Education and for that reason did a disservice to those who are/were talented in central office. Because he failed to set the tone. After awhile the bullies would take hold. The people who were in their cars at 5:01pm, and took Friday's off as they "worked from home" all week. He fired maybe one person--whose work was such an embarassment --she was barely literate and was asked not to return by a parents group. Her position Head of Communications. (I could not make this up). But who were talented, head of accountability, deputy business officer, community liaison all left when they were great talents.
256 agree | 236 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately Assistant Superintendent Francisco Millet's story is common in the District of Columbia Public Schools. I can name another Assistant Superintendent who shares his style and attempts to intimidate teachers.
253 agree | 250 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Karen Dickerson said:
The earnest attention being paid to the current state of the DCPS is long overdue and much welcomed. Many residents undoubtedly applaud the sweeping reforms Chancellor Rhee and the Mayor plan to institute and recognize that not everyone in the system is inept, an idiot, or even a crook. Going beyond simply making it “look pretty” will be a drastic cultural change and a tragic blow to those comfortable with the status quo, as well those unaccustomed to be held accountable –not to mention being charged with the task of actually having to think. Being “progressive” is daunting and yes, even “troublesome” for some, but when one takes into account the increase in the number of charter schools in the District (only a few of whom actually meet federal student-performance benchmarks), Fenty’s and Rhee’s initiatives represent a unique opportunity (if not a noble undertaking) to improve student performance rates and provide students in the District—the Nation’s Capital—with a world-class educat
277 agree | 230 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
When will Ms. Rhee announce the leadership team that she has assembled. There are people showing up but no one has been formally introduced, at least, to the employees in the trenches. Ms. Rhee couldn't tell the council what the duties of her transition team would be but she could give you the salary "range" not even the job title so I guess they will just "do what their supervisor tells them to." Millet is a whole different creature but he isn't the only parasite in the school system. Building moral is not a concern of these people even though Leadership 101 dictates a collaborative environment for effective change.
239 agree | 259 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
>Re: Drilling down in D.C. schools< Anonymous Examiner Reader: it is not that everyone in the central office of DCPS is an idiot or a crook but that the lack of rational structure wastes the talents of any of those people with experience and credentials you cite, so they cannot possibly serve as assets and help students. If an agency with so many Budget Analysts cannot spend Federal Grant funds legally or purchase textbooks on time, and a system with so many Curriculum Specialists cannot teach children, it is indeed time to clear out the central office and start over. The sooner the better.
749 agree | 229 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media portraying everyone in central office as an idiot or a crook. There are people at Central with experiences and credentials who are assets to the system and help students. In fact, due to the lack of communication from the Rhee administration to the current central office staff (perhaps based on their mistaken belief that all are incompetent) many excellent people who ARE employable in top jobs in the area are leaving. When will that story be told?!
257 agree | 241 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader Ms. Betty Lewis said:
Why don't we let the court seperate the lies from the truth. Lanier moved to fast on her personal vendetta against the Commander. Bauman from the FOP is an idiot, Lanier assigns police and the cars and the bikes, not the Commander. We know that all the trashing of the Commander's reputation is coming out of Lanier's office, maybe the investigators that are working on the Commanders case will uncover the true reason that Lanier was picked for Chief, knowing that she is not the brightest star in the sky . Why has Lanier surrounded herself with Commanders and Assistant Chief that had domestic charges filed against them ?
572 agree | 344 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree