Jonetta Rose Barras: Marie Johns, she could have been a D.C. Council contender
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Marie Johns should have taken the advice offered to her early in the mayoral campaign: Shoot a little lower — maybe the at-large seat on the D.C. Council. But as a retired president of a major telecommunications company, she couldn’t clip her ambition. She couldn’t imagine that she hadn’t won friends in all the right places. Didn’t she receive an award from the Greater Washington Board of Trade?

Hadn’t she helped the D.C. Chamber of Commerce reconstruct its board-of-trade wannabe marquee into its own unique banner with celebrity draw? Wasn’t she better than the neighborhood bank, passing around Verizon’s money to help nonprofit organizations?

What went wrong?

Long-term memory loss. It’s a serious disease in politics.

Even Mayor Anthony Williams forgot the woman — although she is one of his wife’s good friends and served him ably on those ghastly task forces, sundry councils and groups such as the National Capital Revitalization Corporation.

Still, in some sections of the city, it’s “Marie who?”

Johns miscalculated the connection she had with the electorate because of her corporate position. She thought it would be all accolades, palms and genuflection.

Johns didn’t understand the last experience the city had with a woman mayor and former corporate executive, Sharon Pratt (then-Kelly). Pratt was deadly — like the fifth-quarter tax year she advocated to get the District through the financial crisis she created.

And though Johns has sought to distance herself from that history, it remains fresh and sour for too many citizens. (This may be why politicians hate functional long-term memory; it can be fatal.)

The name recognition handicap and the Kelly corporate proximity have been exacerbated by Johns’ flaccid campaign operation. Squandering opportunity, Johns has not distinguished herself among the gang of five. She has offered 1970s public policy solutions to 21st century problems. She also has become Miss Jane One-note.

Ask a question about neighborhood economic development, the answer: education. Ask about financial solvency, it’s education. Ask about the crime rate, it’s education.

She should have announced for the D.C. Board of Education. Now, there’s a race you’d love to see: D.C. City Administrator Robert Bobb and Marie Johns slugging it out for president.

Johns has done OK — maybe better than expected. She has moved from the bottom of the pack to the middle.

When she tells potential voters her personal story of transformation from a hardscrabble beginning

0to hard-won success through sheer determination and divine assistance, she connects with them. When she says she wants them to see “my heart,” they fall in love.

Time is short — less than 100 days before the democratic primary in September.

And fortunately, there aren’t enough lovers or love in the District to carry Johns over the threshold of the mayoral suite.

Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for WAMU radio’s D.C. “Politics Hour with Kojo and Jonetta.”

Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Lisa said:
Do a grammar check -- you have a who/whom problem in the first sentence of the 6th paragraph. Are there no editors around?

121 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:52 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Barras, Please stop straddling the fence!!! One minute you are heralding Rhee as the best thing since slice bread and now you speak the truth...A woman WITHOUT a Plan

112 agree | 124 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader SL said:
This article truly addressed the major issue that continues to cripple the school system and drive highly qualified teachers from educating in the district. There is an urgent need for accountability starting all the way from the top. Without significant changes, it we will only be like a bandaid being placed over an infected wound.

214 agree | 216 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:01 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Right...tell me another one said:
You know this is not going to be popular, but although Janey had the rights ideas on curriculum, you swear he was a paid consultant and never managed staff. He did not set a mission, did not review employees based on if they lived up to the mission even his own Declaration of Education and for that reason did a disservice to those who are/were talented in central office. Because he failed to set the tone. After awhile the bullies would take hold. The people who were in their cars at 5:01pm, and took Friday's off as they "worked from home" all week. He fired maybe one person--whose work was such an embarassment --she was barely literate and was asked not to return by a parents group. Her position Head of Communications. (I could not make this up). But who were talented, head of accountability, deputy business officer, community liaison all left when they were great talents.

253 agree | 234 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:42 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately Assistant Superintendent Francisco Millet's story is common in the District of Columbia Public Schools. I can name another Assistant Superintendent who shares his style and attempts to intimidate teachers.

251 agree | 248 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Karen Dickerson said:
The earnest attention being paid to the current state of the DCPS is long overdue and much welcomed. Many residents undoubtedly applaud the sweeping reforms Chancellor Rhee and the Mayor plan to institute and recognize that not everyone in the system is inept, an idiot, or even a crook. Going beyond simply making it “look pretty” will be a drastic cultural change and a tragic blow to those comfortable with the status quo, as well those unaccustomed to be held accountable –not to mention being charged with the task of actually having to think. Being “progressive” is daunting and yes, even “troublesome” for some, but when one takes into account the increase in the number of charter schools in the District (only a few of whom actually meet federal student-performance benchmarks), Fenty’s and Rhee’s initiatives represent a unique opportunity (if not a noble undertaking) to improve student performance rates and provide students in the District—the Nation’s Capital—with a world-class educat

275 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:31 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
When will Ms. Rhee announce the leadership team that she has assembled. There are people showing up but no one has been formally introduced, at least, to the employees in the trenches. Ms. Rhee couldn't tell the council what the duties of her transition team would be but she could give you the salary "range" not even the job title so I guess they will just "do what their supervisor tells them to." Millet is a whole different creature but he isn't the only parasite in the school system. Building moral is not a concern of these people even though Leadership 101 dictates a collaborative environment for effective change.

237 agree | 257 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Mike Licht said:
>Re: Drilling down in D.C. schools< Anonymous Examiner Reader: it is not that everyone in the central office of DCPS is an idiot or a crook but that the lack of rational structure wastes the talents of any of those people with experience and credentials you cite, so they cannot possibly serve as assets and help students. If an agency with so many Budget Analysts cannot spend Federal Grant funds legally or purchase textbooks on time, and a system with so many Curriculum Specialists cannot teach children, it is indeed time to clear out the central office and start over. The sooner the better.

748 agree | 227 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:57 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media portraying everyone in central office as an idiot or a crook. There are people at Central with experiences and credentials who are assets to the system and help students. In fact, due to the lack of communication from the Rhee administration to the current central office staff (perhaps based on their mistaken belief that all are incompetent) many excellent people who ARE employable in top jobs in the area are leaving. When will that story be told?!

256 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 25, 2007 re: "Jonetta Rose Barras: Dan Tangherlini: The wizard’s assistant"

Examiner Reader Ms. Betty Lewis said:
Why don't we let the court seperate the lies from the truth. Lanier moved to fast on her personal vendetta against the Commander. Bauman from the FOP is an idiot, Lanier assigns police and the cars and the bikes, not the Commander. We know that all the trashing of the Commander's reputation is coming out of Lanier's office, maybe the investigators that are working on the Commanders case will uncover the true reason that Lanier was picked for Chief, knowing that she is not the brightest star in the sky . Why has Lanier surrounded herself with Commanders and Assistant Chief that had domestic charges filed against them ?

569 agree | 342 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)