Jonetta Rose Barras: No independence celebration here
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - You didn't sing the National Anthem, or fly the flag, or even light a firecracker. This Fourth of July celebration went on without you.

Sure, you appreciate being an American. Growing up, you recited the Pledge of Allegiance and studied the country's history: the revolt against British rule, the Declaration of Independence.

Still, it was difficult in the segregated south to believe any of it applied to you. So your family, like others on Mexico Street in New Orleans, took the day to eat hot dogs, potato salad, chocolate cake, play dodge ball, generally commune with each other. No one dared to speak of liberty or death.

You and others were like Frederick Douglass, puzzled about why there was any expectation you would commemorate someone else's history. “What, to the American Slave, is your Fourth of July,” Douglass asked in his July 5, 1852 speech. “I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham...; your national greatness, swelling vanity...; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery...”

Yes, you have come to understand that you and other African Americans own this country as much as anyone else. You earned your stake in it. You worked hard and believed deeper and perhaps more passionately in the concept of America, despite the contradictory behavior of those who called themselves leaders and the protectors of the country’s founding principles. And, a whole bunch of people in your family or the communities where you have lived, have died in foreign lands to keep the flag flying, allowing America to be called “the land of the free.”

But who is free; where is this democracy, you ask yourself each Fourth of July. In the District of Columbia, a contradiction of a different sort continues.

Here, in a place that fancies itself as the epitome of Democracy, residents are without representation in their national government. Here, where the White House, the Capitol and the Supreme Court stand as iconographic reminders of the principles on which this country was founded; where residents are shipped off to wars; where they pay billions of dollars in taxes; and where people still believe in the Bill of Rights, residents are forced each day to reenact the country's colonial beginnings.

What, you wonder, would George Washington say? Douglass’s comments would be what they were in 1852: “Fellow citizens, pardon me, allow me to ask ... What have I, or those I represent, to do with your national independence?”

And a fine question that is even today. In good conscience you could never really celebrate the Fourth of July — until District residents gained the same democratic rights and independence as others in the country.

Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for WAMU radio's D.C. Politics Hour with Kojo and Jonetta. She can be reached at rosebook1@aol.com

Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Lisa said:
Do a grammar check -- you have a who/whom problem in the first sentence of the 6th paragraph. Are there no editors around?

121 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:52 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Barras, Please stop straddling the fence!!! One minute you are heralding Rhee as the best thing since slice bread and now you speak the truth...A woman WITHOUT a Plan

112 agree | 124 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader SL said:
This article truly addressed the major issue that continues to cripple the school system and drive highly qualified teachers from educating in the district. There is an urgent need for accountability starting all the way from the top. Without significant changes, it we will only be like a bandaid being placed over an infected wound.

214 agree | 216 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:01 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Right...tell me another one said:
You know this is not going to be popular, but although Janey had the rights ideas on curriculum, you swear he was a paid consultant and never managed staff. He did not set a mission, did not review employees based on if they lived up to the mission even his own Declaration of Education and for that reason did a disservice to those who are/were talented in central office. Because he failed to set the tone. After awhile the bullies would take hold. The people who were in their cars at 5:01pm, and took Friday's off as they "worked from home" all week. He fired maybe one person--whose work was such an embarassment --she was barely literate and was asked not to return by a parents group. Her position Head of Communications. (I could not make this up). But who were talented, head of accountability, deputy business officer, community liaison all left when they were great talents.

253 agree | 234 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:42 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately Assistant Superintendent Francisco Millet's story is common in the District of Columbia Public Schools. I can name another Assistant Superintendent who shares his style and attempts to intimidate teachers.

251 agree | 248 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Karen Dickerson said:
The earnest attention being paid to the current state of the DCPS is long overdue and much welcomed. Many residents undoubtedly applaud the sweeping reforms Chancellor Rhee and the Mayor plan to institute and recognize that not everyone in the system is inept, an idiot, or even a crook. Going beyond simply making it “look pretty” will be a drastic cultural change and a tragic blow to those comfortable with the status quo, as well those unaccustomed to be held accountable –not to mention being charged with the task of actually having to think. Being “progressive” is daunting and yes, even “troublesome” for some, but when one takes into account the increase in the number of charter schools in the District (only a few of whom actually meet federal student-performance benchmarks), Fenty’s and Rhee’s initiatives represent a unique opportunity (if not a noble undertaking) to improve student performance rates and provide students in the District—the Nation’s Capital—with a world-class educat

275 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:31 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
When will Ms. Rhee announce the leadership team that she has assembled. There are people showing up but no one has been formally introduced, at least, to the employees in the trenches. Ms. Rhee couldn't tell the council what the duties of her transition team would be but she could give you the salary "range" not even the job title so I guess they will just "do what their supervisor tells them to." Millet is a whole different creature but he isn't the only parasite in the school system. Building moral is not a concern of these people even though Leadership 101 dictates a collaborative environment for effective change.

237 agree | 257 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Mike Licht said:
>Re: Drilling down in D.C. schools< Anonymous Examiner Reader: it is not that everyone in the central office of DCPS is an idiot or a crook but that the lack of rational structure wastes the talents of any of those people with experience and credentials you cite, so they cannot possibly serve as assets and help students. If an agency with so many Budget Analysts cannot spend Federal Grant funds legally or purchase textbooks on time, and a system with so many Curriculum Specialists cannot teach children, it is indeed time to clear out the central office and start over. The sooner the better.

748 agree | 227 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:57 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media portraying everyone in central office as an idiot or a crook. There are people at Central with experiences and credentials who are assets to the system and help students. In fact, due to the lack of communication from the Rhee administration to the current central office staff (perhaps based on their mistaken belief that all are incompetent) many excellent people who ARE employable in top jobs in the area are leaving. When will that story be told?!

256 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 25, 2007 re: "Jonetta Rose Barras: Dan Tangherlini: The wizard’s assistant"

Examiner Reader Ms. Betty Lewis said:
Why don't we let the court seperate the lies from the truth. Lanier moved to fast on her personal vendetta against the Commander. Bauman from the FOP is an idiot, Lanier assigns police and the cars and the bikes, not the Commander. We know that all the trashing of the Commander's reputation is coming out of Lanier's office, maybe the investigators that are working on the Commanders case will uncover the true reason that Lanier was picked for Chief, knowing that she is not the brightest star in the sky . Why has Lanier surrounded herself with Commanders and Assistant Chief that had domestic charges filed against them ?

569 agree | 342 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)