Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Jonetta Rose Barras: Michael Brown lacks real vision for D.C.

Jun 22, 2006 2:00 AM (894 days ago) by Jonetta Rose Barras , The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - If a warm smile and a high charisma quotient were all that were needed to be the next mayor of Washington, you think Michael Brown would be topping polls and running to the bank with pockets overflowing with cash. Instead, he’s near bottom in the five-contender lineup.

You’re not surprised. He and his campaign operation have lived up to your predictions. But, those years on the city’s Boxing Commission have taught Brown a thing or two about hanging on the ropes, ignoring the busted nose, cut above the eye and managing fatigue brought on by an unmerciful beating.

Maybe he’s hoping for a TKO. The District doesn’t have runoffs. You hate the idea of the Democratic Primary being the unofficial General Election because Democrats outnumber Republicans. You hate, too, that someone will float into the executive seat of a $9 billion corporation with less than 50 percent of the vote. That is decidedly undemocratic, you think.

(Wait, wait. Now, you're going on a tangent.)

This story continues below
Advertisement

It isn’t that Brown is saying all the wrong things. In fact, you think some of his rhetoric is insightful. It’s true that not all residents have benefited from the economic prosperity. No one will ever claim that D.C. Public Schools is providing a superior education. And only a fool would dispute that “doing well” means “doing good” in your community.

But Brown’s punch is flabby. He’s spent far too much time shadow boxing. You can’t determine whether he imagined his opponent his daddy, Ron Brown Sr., former secretary of the U.S. Department of Commerce who died in a plane crash, or former President Bill Clinton.

Michael Brown talks an awful lot about bridges: “We must and should build a bridge and provide opportunities for our less fortunate communities. ... I will be a leader who will build that bridge. ... Let’s build that bridge together.”

Sounds familiar?

Not surprisingly, Brown, a former finance vice chairman of the Democratic National Committee, spent much of his time on the national political scene. He says he was surrogate speaker of the Kerry-Edwards presidential campaign in 2004; the Gore-Lieberman campaign in 2000 and the Clinton-Gore campaigns in 1996 and 1992.

OK, you don’t want to give the impression that Brown turned to the local scene when Democrats didn’t get their act together nationally. He has done some things in the city including bringing the ear-biting-over-the-hill Mike Tyson to then-MCI Arena, “supporting Roosevelt High School girls’ basketball team, and serving on the board of the Whitman Walker Clinic. (Was that before or after the organization’s fiscal woes, you wonder)?

Still, Brown doesn’t offer any original thinking, sound public policy ideas or tangible vision for the nation’s capital. Truth is, the only thing he brings to the table is someone else’s doggie bag.

Jonetta Rose Barras is the political analyst for WAMU radio’s “D.C. Politics Hour with Kojo and Jonetta.” She can be reached at rosebook1@aol.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

7:26 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Lisa said:
Do a grammar check -- you have a who/whom problem in the first sentence of the 6th paragraph. Are there no editors around?

123 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:52 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008 re: "Calling what you do in the classroom teaching"

Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Barras, Please stop straddling the fence!!! One minute you are heralding Rhee as the best thing since slice bread and now you speak the truth...A woman WITHOUT a Plan

114 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader SL said:
This article truly addressed the major issue that continues to cripple the school system and drive highly qualified teachers from educating in the district. There is an urgent need for accountability starting all the way from the top. Without significant changes, it we will only be like a bandaid being placed over an infected wound.

216 agree | 218 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:01 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Right...tell me another one said:
You know this is not going to be popular, but although Janey had the rights ideas on curriculum, you swear he was a paid consultant and never managed staff. He did not set a mission, did not review employees based on if they lived up to the mission even his own Declaration of Education and for that reason did a disservice to those who are/were talented in central office. Because he failed to set the tone. After awhile the bullies would take hold. The people who were in their cars at 5:01pm, and took Friday's off as they "worked from home" all week. He fired maybe one person--whose work was such an embarassment --she was barely literate and was asked not to return by a parents group. Her position Head of Communications. (I could not make this up). But who were talented, head of accountability, deputy business officer, community liaison all left when they were great talents.

256 agree | 236 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:42 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately Assistant Superintendent Francisco Millet's story is common in the District of Columbia Public Schools. I can name another Assistant Superintendent who shares his style and attempts to intimidate teachers.

253 agree | 250 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Karen Dickerson said:
The earnest attention being paid to the current state of the DCPS is long overdue and much welcomed. Many residents undoubtedly applaud the sweeping reforms Chancellor Rhee and the Mayor plan to institute and recognize that not everyone in the system is inept, an idiot, or even a crook. Going beyond simply making it “look pretty” will be a drastic cultural change and a tragic blow to those comfortable with the status quo, as well those unaccustomed to be held accountable –not to mention being charged with the task of actually having to think. Being “progressive” is daunting and yes, even “troublesome” for some, but when one takes into account the increase in the number of charter schools in the District (only a few of whom actually meet federal student-performance benchmarks), Fenty’s and Rhee’s initiatives represent a unique opportunity (if not a noble undertaking) to improve student performance rates and provide students in the District—the Nation’s Capital—with a world-class educat

277 agree | 230 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:31 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Column: Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
When will Ms. Rhee announce the leadership team that she has assembled. There are people showing up but no one has been formally introduced, at least, to the employees in the trenches. Ms. Rhee couldn't tell the council what the duties of her transition team would be but she could give you the salary "range" not even the job title so I guess they will just "do what their supervisor tells them to." Millet is a whole different creature but he isn't the only parasite in the school system. Building moral is not a concern of these people even though Leadership 101 dictates a collaborative environment for effective change.

239 agree | 259 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Mike Licht said:
>Re: Drilling down in D.C. schools< Anonymous Examiner Reader: it is not that everyone in the central office of DCPS is an idiot or a crook but that the lack of rational structure wastes the talents of any of those people with experience and credentials you cite, so they cannot possibly serve as assets and help students. If an agency with so many Budget Analysts cannot spend Federal Grant funds legally or purchase textbooks on time, and a system with so many Curriculum Specialists cannot teach children, it is indeed time to clear out the central office and start over. The sooner the better.

749 agree | 229 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:57 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007 re: "Drilling down in D.C. schools"

Examiner Reader said:
Frankly I am sick and tired of the media portraying everyone in central office as an idiot or a crook. There are people at Central with experiences and credentials who are assets to the system and help students. In fact, due to the lack of communication from the Rhee administration to the current central office staff (perhaps based on their mistaken belief that all are incompetent) many excellent people who ARE employable in top jobs in the area are leaving. When will that story be told?!

257 agree | 241 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 25, 2007 re: "Jonetta Rose Barras: Dan Tangherlini: The wizard’s assistant"

Examiner Reader Ms. Betty Lewis said:
Why don't we let the court seperate the lies from the truth. Lanier moved to fast on her personal vendetta against the Commander. Bauman from the FOP is an idiot, Lanier assigns police and the cars and the bikes, not the Commander. We know that all the trashing of the Commander's reputation is coming out of Lanier's office, maybe the investigators that are working on the Commanders case will uncover the true reason that Lanier was picked for Chief, knowing that she is not the brightest star in the sky . Why has Lanier surrounded herself with Commanders and Assistant Chief that had domestic charges filed against them ?

572 agree | 344 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement