Multimedia News

Blondes vs. Brunettes
20 photos
Beyonce is photographed in New York on Thursd...
Faces of murder
20 photos
This undated photo obtained from a MySpace we...
Nicole Kidman celebrates world premiere of 'Australia'
20 photos
Australian actor Nicole Kidman waves as she w...
Stars bid fond farewell to MTV's 'TRL'
20 photos
Taylor Swift poses in the press room during M...
Victoria's Secret fashion show
20 photos
A model walks the runway during Victoria's Se...

Past meets future in SoMa

Aug 13, 2008 3:00 AM (99 days ago) by Mike Aldax, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Amid the constant clanking of jackhammers and the rise of skyscrapers in the South of Market area, the significance of historic architecture may sometimes be overshadowed.

But before The City gives the green light to razing buildings in the area, it wants to know which ones are important.

As the massive Transbay Transit Center project moves forward, development in SoMa could mean the demise of a number of buildings that date as far back as the 1906 earthquake, according to a preliminary survey commissioned by The City.

The drastic redevelopment, including the 1,000-foot Transbay tower and seven surrounding high-rise towers exceeding 550 feet, means a long list of historic buildings will inevitably face demolition along the way, city planners say.

This story continues below
Advertisement

For example, two buildings on the 100 block of Fremont Street are among the few remaining downtown relics of pre-World War II architecture, the report said.

“We’re talking about a major growth area for The City in a confined space,” said Josh Switzky, an urban designer with the Planning Department. “We want to capitalize on transit investment while ensuring a quality of place that’s still very San Francisco.”

In order to preserve some of the area’s architectural past, city officials commissioned local consultant firm Kelley & VerPlanck to survey and identify San Francisco’s most historic buildings. The buildings listed date back as far as 1898, but it is not yet clear which, or how many, would survive the modernization, Switzky said.

Gabriel Metcalf, executive director of the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association, a public-policy think tank, said he is confident the construction will not obliterate all of The City’s historic buildings. The survey, he said, shows that city officials are intent on fusing old San Francisco with the modern look.

He pointed to the downtown area as a successful examples of how to accommodate change while preserving “important pieces of the past.”

“In the downtown area, you have this wonderful mix of historic buildings and facades with a very high density of employment,” Metcalf said. “It was through careful planning that they managed to achieve both things.”

At a Planning Commission meeting Thursday, city officials will begin perusing a preliminary list of historic buildings that are under threat by plans to modernize the blocks surrounding Mission and First streets.

maldax@sfexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:59 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 29, 2008 re: "Home Depot, Wal-Mart mark recent Liberty Road upgrades"

Examiner Reader said:
Wow, the Convention Center is almost done being build, one day my grandmother and I would go over there, she really knows what's going to happen there. And I wish the Wal-Mart thing would hurry up. I really want to see how the place look in there from Value Food being dusty for the pass 5 years. And I change my mind about the Marshall's being TJMaxx, I want A.J. Wright to be there. And I see they put the Liquor store next to Marshalls. When I went to Marshalls about 2 weeks ago it looked like they were going to closed down, I hope so, I don't like that place. Yes, please knock down those old buildings so it'll be room for people to park and come to Wal-Mart. I hope it'll be a SuperCenter, and I hope its done by 2011.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:48 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 29, 2008 re: "Neighbors hope to derail trail"

Trail Border said:
Hey Sam, got any sympathy for the gentleman who had the living hell beat out of him on the trail last week?

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:05 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 16, 2008 re: "Past meets future in SoMa"

Examiner Reader said:
the photo in the article seems to be of the house of shields on new montgomery - not mentioned. also i went to look at 562 howard, mentioned- and there was no such building, unless i made one of my errors

10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:52 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 14, 2008 re: "Past meets future in SoMa"

Examiner Reader said:
Why are we building a 1000 ft, transit tower surrounded by 550 ft, high-rise buildings in an unquestionably seismically active area (if the experts are correct?) which is poised for a major earthquake?

9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:47 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 14, 2008 re: "Development gears toward Howard’s ‘village feel’"

Examiner Reader said:
When are they planning to open the first half of the community to the public?

11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:38 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 14, 2008 re: "Development gears toward Howard’s ‘village feel’"

Examiner Reader said:
We live right near this area and we were just wondering are the community stores going to be open to the public?

10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:56 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 13, 2008 re: "Past meets future in SoMa"

Examiner Reader said:
""Gabriel Metcalf, executive director of the San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association, a public-policy think tank, said he is confident the construction will not obliterate all of The City’s historic buildings. The survey, he said, shows that city officials are intent on fusing old San Francisco with the modern look."" LOL interesting word choice Gabe, "fusing old San Francisco with the modern look" at your testimony before the Planning Commission on the Market Octavia Plan you supported 400 foot residential towers less than 15 yards from 25 foot 1930's stick build housing behind South Van Ness along Layfayette. Your support for that certainly didn't consider "fusing" anything but rather ripping the fabric in this part of the city. Think about it next time you see your SPUR paycheck show up in your checking account.

24 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:03 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "Home is where the houses are"

SFLiberal said:
Valleyboy, you are delusional. Nobody in their right mind would consider San Jose the premier city in the Bay Area. That is ridiculous! Bigger doesn't mean better. I mean, seriously, most people in the U.S. and the World don't even know where San Jose is. Most people know and admire San Francisco. I used to live in San Jose. I didn't hate it but come on! It is no San Francisco. San Francisco has everything, culture, cool nightlife, amazing restaurants, beautiful parks, the Bay, the Ocean, and its walkable with good mass transit. San Jose, by many counts, is an overgrown suburb. The Silicon Valley is very important, I agree. But San Francisco captures everyones' hearts, not San Jose. Seriously. Your envy is pretty apparent. Be happy for what you have but don't get irrational about it. San Francisco is the best city on the Earth. San Jose is a pretty good city located in the High Tech Capitol of the World. I give it that.

13 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:58 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Struggle between preservation and development continues on San Bruno Mountain"

SFLiberal said:
What the Bay Area needs to do is cap the population and stop ALL NEW DEVELOPMENT. We need to preserve what we have. Illegal Immigration is also not good because it puts pressure on the population to grow, use more resources and contribute to sprawl. CAP THE POPULATION! STOP DEVELOPMENT! PERIOD.

13 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:38 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Struggle between preservation and development continues on San Bruno Mountain"

Bay Area Taxpayer said:
The entire reason for expansion onto open land is to increase tax revenue to the city or county where the land is located. The resulting gradual degradation of quality of life for existing inhabitants whether it be endangered butterflies or endangered human beings is not an issued for goverments. Money is number one always. People's lives and the quality is never an issue. Money is always short in San Mateo County and almost all of its cities due to fiscal mismanagement by their respective governments. One can fight for the land but eventually with eventual over-population there is no way to stop it ... think of it as the beginning of the end. Have a nice day.

11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:50 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 6, 2008 re: "Visitacion Valley residents could see influx of neighbors"

Examiner Reader said:
I would understand if the article was talking about development displacing a piece of nature. But this is about building something on a site of a shuttered factory in the middle of an urban area near 2 rail lines. Who in their right mind can be against that?

15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Visitacion Valley residents could see influx of neighbors"

Examiner Reader said:
why are we apparently attempting to cover every bit of open land in the bay area with development? as if traffic isn't already bad enough and mass-transit isn't fully challenged trying to handle the current level of commuters.

13 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:13 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Visitacion Valley residents could see influx of neighbors"

Examiner Reader said:
I live in Brisbane too close and say NO! Every low-rent neighborhood invites more problems. The old Geneva Towers were torn down twice, lest we forget.

14 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:34 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "‘15-acre project’ could get bigger"

Examiner Reader said:
I reside in Foster City and totally agree with this article. There is entirely too much development being proposed!

17 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:45 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Peninsula’s future dwells in the clouds"

Examiner Reader said:
san carlos laurel street is filthy with litter and shops closing and moving to better locations. No population growth , just more filth and litter.

56 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:42 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Home is where the houses are"

Examiner Reader said:
ValleyBoy, you have no idea what you're talking about. San Jose has more people than SF (though your numbers are definitely a bit off), yes, but SF has nearly twice as many jobs and is four times as densely populated. San Jose remains the only city in the United States of more than 500,000 people to lose population during the day when people go to work - San Francisco's population gains several hundred thousand people during working hours. Places that lose population when people leave their homes to go to work are what's known as suburbs. San Francisco county also covers only 47 square miles, while Santa Clara county covers more than 1200. Can you grasp how total population is fairly meaningless when you consider the huge gap in the amount of space available in each area? San Francisco remains the major city in the region and that won't be changing. Get used to it

16 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:50 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Home is where the houses are"

ValleyBoy said:
This article is absurdly provincial. Any story about ABAG has to relate how it affects the biggest most important city in the nine county San Jose Bay Area, which is: San Jose, NOT San Francisco. San Jose will top 1 Million people in August (more or less). San Francisco is arguing with the Census bureau if it does or does not have more that 749,000 people, the same population it had in 1950. From a journalistic point of view, the article SHOULD have compared ABAG's requirements to actual growth, vs Cal Dept of Finance projects. SF is projected to grow by less than 1%, while San Jose will do 5-7%. It is a demographic certainty that San Jose will be twice as large as San Francisco by 2020. Why does this article focus on a second tier city like San Francisco ? San Mateo only has 707,000 people living there, Santa Clara almost 2 million. Why not mention the important places like San Jose and Santa Clara instead of burying your head in the sand

16 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:29 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Home is where the houses are"

Bay Area Taxpayer said:
There are hundreds of formaldehyde spewing FEMA trailers still unused and leftover from Katrina ... Newsome make the call ,make it happen ...ship them to SF ...mission accomplished.

17 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:42 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008 re: "Report recommends radical street changes"

Examiner Reader said:
benches and gardens will only invite bums and vagrants.

16 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:20 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008 re: "Report recommends radical street changes"

Examiner Reader said:
""Under the draft plan, crosswalks would become more prolific; parking lanes would be replaced with benches and gardens; traffic would be slowed and squeezed into narrower streets; concrete footpaths would be replaced with rainwaterabsorbing dirt, plants and trees; and “generous” sidewalks would be built with plenty of curb ramps."" Such a radical progressive idea, and in District 6? Hey isnt that Stupervisor Daly's District? Won't such improvements cause gentrification? Me thinks that the good Stupervisor should be 100% against these gentrification projects...imagine trees, gardens and benches in District 6!!

16 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:17 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Community funds to bridge economic gaps in SoMa"

Examiner Reader said:
""SoMa resident Jim Mekko said that eight to 10 years ago the downtown neighborhood was “ground zero” of the dot-com boom and bust and the funds would bring needed relief to the community."" Not exactly sure what dot-com bust has to do with the topic at hand? The people that live in my area are working class people and lots of Philipino families with kids. I talk with them lots and what they want more than anything and what nobody including our supervisor has delivered is crime free streets. We dont care anymore about much of anything else. ""Daly praised the committee’s work, saying it would put the money “into the hands of the community folks that can do good to mitigate some of the negative impacts from very large development that is happening in the South of Market.”" Well we are community folk. We do not need the money we want safety. There are kids right down the block that cannot go outside because of the drug users. All the other trash we can live with we want safety.

20 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:42 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 26, 2008 re: "Elkridge in the midst of a residential and commercial development boom"

Examiner Reader said:
In reference to Elkridge and it's designation for affordable housing and high density, I would be most interested in an update from DPZ and the State Highway Administration on how the traffic will be handled at an acceptable level of "C" or better, particularly as one heads north into Baltimore County. A plan to handle traffic going to UMBC, Catonsville Community College, the Arbutus train station and BWI airport and commercialdistrict needs to be designed & implemented before the density is completed. Mass transit by light rail or bus line needs to be in place to support the existing and limited Route 1 right-of-way through Elkridge and into Arbutus. For once, can we not put the infrastructure in place BEFORE the density?

17 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:08 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Corridor ready to sprout"

Examiner Reader said:
Well yes of course it makes perfect sense to build 400 foot residential towers along South Van Ness from Mission to Market cause nobody in the Hayes Valley area of the Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan area would have tolerated those monsters. Oh yes, the towers will provide limited to no off street parking, they will cast shadows into residential enclaves where over 400 people now live less than 20 yards to the east in the Western SOMA, create street level winds to rival Fox Plaza. So much for the San Francisco urban fabric which will be torn in this part of The City. No where else has such a disruption been allowed by placing 400 feet towers 20 yards from two story residential. Oh wait, I seem to recall this type of land use proximity in Bangkok. The watch word in San Francisco circles is...dump it in SOMA they wont care. Goes for pot clubs, regional serving night clubs and so called "light industrial use" what a laugh. Now you Supervisors show some backbone and speakup!

23 agree | 32 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:39 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Home Depot axes warehouse plans"

Examiner Reader said:
I remember a friend of mine who used live on the same block as Mr. Ammiano referred to Mr. Ammiano as a "Man of the People." I guess the "people" in this case doesn't include the "people" in Sophie Maxwell's district who could benefit from an employer and business like home depot instead of the scores of liquor stores in that district.

22 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:43 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008 re: "Home Depot axes warehouse plans"

Examiner Reader said:
Only a San Francisco progressive politician like Tom Ammiano would gloat over denied jobs and urban blight. Glad he is terming out.

22 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:35 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 23, 2008 re: "Eldersburg mall gets new chance at life"

carroll towne shopper said:
i also am very dissapointed that even if you are a shopper at the mall and try to sit down for a few minutes in peace that the mall security has to come up and try and kick you out hell its empty enough just let the kids skate and do what they want they arent hurting anyone and if they are its only themselves

23 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:54 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 18, 2008 re: "Fee possible fix for housing crunch"

Examiner Reader said:
"Local Government" was never intended to interfere in the private marketplace like they continue to try and do. They don't need a "fee" ... because the term "fee" is always used to disguise a TAX.

119 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:48 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 18, 2008 re: "Fee possible fix for housing crunch"

Examiner Reader said:
Bureaucrats don't do anything unless it benefits THEM. We don't need a "fee" and we don't need them interfering in the private sector. The job "projection" is only a guess and they're going to use that as an excuse to steal money from the public. IF the jobs develop, fine. If not, fine. The private community always figures out a way without lame bureaucrats interfering.

146 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:06 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 18, 2008 re: "Fee possible fix for housing crunch"

Examiner Reader said:
I work for San Mateo County in a department of over 350 staff. Less than 20% live in San Mateo County. 95% of those who live outside of the county say it is because they can't afford to live in the same they work in. Most of the support staff make so little that they qualify for some sort of housing or food subsidy program. The need is NOW not in 2025.

155 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:15 AM MST on Sat., Feb. 16, 2008 re: "Fee possible fix for housing crunch"

Alarm Dude said:
Let me figure this out. Business will increase jobs by 40%. In order to provide *Socialist, Government* housing for these employees, we impose a tax on businesses. Businesses take their expansion plans elsewhere because of the taxes. No new employees. In fact, businesses leave rather than expand. Employment drops. PROBLEM SOLVED!

158 agree | 165 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:12 AM MST on Tue., Jan. 22, 2008 re: "Methadone clinic slated for converted Dundalk home"

white sluts black said:
A higher energy price is a sacrifice we have to make for cleaner fuels

216 agree | 154 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:46 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 13, 2008 re: "Divisadero Street overhaul planned"

Examiner Reader said:
Sinister elements and a no man's land? This part of the Divisadero Corridor hardly resembles life outside the Internation Green Zone in Baghdad?

234 agree | 162 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:06 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 13, 2008 re: "Divisadero Street overhaul planned"

Observation said:
It never fails; when the city comes up with a plan to make changes to a neglected area of the city, and one that is indisputably a busy conduit, naysayers grab their milk crates and plop down in front of their computers and trash every feature of the plan. How many of you attended the planning board meeting and presented alternate plans? How many of you actually participated in the planning process? The best way to reclaim a neighborhood from sinister elements is to make it a magnet for pedestrians and commerce - not by letting it become a no-man's-land.

217 agree | 207 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:07 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 12, 2008 re: "Divisadero Street overhaul planned"

Examiner Reader said:
Just what San Francisco needs, one more trendy, upscale neighborhood in which to live and shop.

238 agree | 177 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:00 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 7, 2008 re: "Divisadero Street overhaul planned"

Examiner Reader said:
Boutique business means overpriced shopping for rich Caucasian snobs. Wonder how many minority low income residents...what's left of them... can afford the "new" Divisadero now?

201 agree | 184 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:28 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 7, 2008 re: "Divisadero Street overhaul planned"

EXAMNER READER said:
I see they are making it easier for drive by shooters to escape even faster than they do....what a few new trees for homeless people to live under...this city's prorities are in the toilet along with its adultress mayor

189 agree | 180 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:12 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Home Depot, Wal-Mart mark recent Liberty Road upgrades"

Examiner Reader said:
Great move!

220 agree | 260 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:19 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Home Depot, Wal-Mart mark recent Liberty Road upgrades"

Person from Randallstown Maryland said:
Hi,so there is going to be a Giant SuperMarket in the Liberty Plaza? Wow, that's nice. BlockBuster has been there for a long time. I think most of the shopping center where Dollar General was located should be knocked down, it would lose alot of business but make a better area. Marshall should be TJMaxx because they have better stuff. It would be crowded because of Wal-Mart, I know the Owings Mills Wal-Mart on Reistertown Road near Valley Centre is crowded all the time. I don't really like the Owings Mills one. If I was the examiner I would close Blockbuster's down and make it as a place called AppleBee's. I can't wait until Ruby Tuesday come to Brenbrook Plaza. Or, it can be a place called FYE (For Your Entertainment) which is a CD store. It's awesome. I heard that they would be building a convention center for seniors or whatever it was on Resource Drive by the Resource Center. I see that they are doing construction.

285 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:48 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 17, 2007 re: "Home Depot, Wal-Mart mark recent Liberty Road upgrades"

Examiner Reader said:
Hello, I'm from Baltimore County in Randallstown and I just want to know when is the Wal-Mart coming to Randallstown? I wonder if it is going to be a supercenter. Yes I've seen the Home Depot and it looks very nice. I was wondering when the Wal-Mart is coming. I'm thinking its coming in March or something I don't know. Well, someday it'll come.

272 agree | 226 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:56 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Parties reach agreement on land proposal"

teen for cash xxx said:
There are too many, not enough handicapped parking spaces in our city

255 agree | 207 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:56 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Warehouse now in Sykesville’s hands"

teen for cash young said:
The quality of education is, is not lower than 15 years ago

244 agree | 192 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:50 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Turf Valley developers want land included in public water, sewer"

teen forcash said:
Pretty much nothing notable happening. My mind is like a complete blank. I've just been hanging out waiting for something to happen. Not much on my mind to speak of. I just don't have anything to say. That's how it is.

262 agree | 222 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:43 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Mall proposal would add living space"

cash teen said:
I haven't gotten much done recently. I don't care. My life's been basically boring these days. Whatever. More or less nothing exciting going on lately, but pfft.

285 agree | 205 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:32 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "County officials will appeal ruling on methadone clinic"

teensforcash said:
My life's been basically boring recently. I've basically been doing nothing to speak of. That's how it is. I just don't have much to say recently. Oh well.

257 agree | 181 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:32 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Lockheed Martin announces Pr. George’s expansion plans"

teen for cash young said:
My mind is like a fog, not that it matters. I just don't have much to say these days. That's how it is. I haven't been up to anything recently.

239 agree | 205 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:24 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Urban planners to map development in Tysons"

teenforcash said:
There are too many, not enough handicapped parking spaces in our city

281 agree | 213 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Midtown Springfield may get new look"

teenforcash said:
I've just been staying at home waiting for something to happen. I just don't have much to say right now, but so it goes. I've basically been doing nothing to speak of, but shrug. Today was a loss. I don't care. That's how it is.

296 agree | 215 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:38 AM MST on Sun., Oct. 28, 2007 re: "Building can soon begin again in Westminster"

Rachel Stevens said:
Today was a loss. I just don't have anything to say. Not that it matters.

360 agree | 247 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:33 AM MST on Sun., Oct. 28, 2007 re: "Critics: Shopping center could hurt downtown"

Susan Ward said:
I've just been staying at home waiting for something to happen. I've just been letting everything wash over me. I can't be bothered with anything recently.

306 agree | 254 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:33 AM MST on Sun., Oct. 28, 2007 re: "Mall proposal would add living space"

Geena Davis said:
I've just been staying at home waiting for something to happen. I've just been letting everything wash over me. I can't be bothered with anything recently.

292 agree | 294 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement