Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Housing officials are telling the families that they have four months to leave the 672-unit complex in Annandale unless they provide information on their employment, tax returns and income, said Paula Sampson, director of the Department of Housing and Community Development.
It’s a snag for the flagship in Fairfax’s affordable housing preservation initiative, in which the county buys rental units or partners with nonprofits to hold down their rent. The program, initiated in 2004, was aimed at maintaining low- and moderately priced living space as housing prices skyrocketed during the region’s building boom. Wedgewood was bought in October 2007.
The tenant information is necessary to determine whether the tenants’ incomes qualify them to live at Wedgewood and whether they are in the United States legally. Sampson said the household’s wage earner cannot be an illegal immigrant. Undocumented family members are not counted toward the rental assistance, which is set by income and family size.
Sully District Supervisor Michael Frey quarreled with housing officials over that policy at Monday’s Board of Supervisors meeting. Frey questioned whether the tenants were being thoroughly vetted for legal status and argued that because of the federal subsidies involved in the project, all of them should be checked.
Income levels, however, appear to be the larger factor in play. The county already has kicked out about 30 tenants from Wedgewood because they made too much to meet the threshold to qualify for the rent-subsidized dwellings, Sampson said. The county allows a mix of incomes at the development, in some cases as high as 100 percent of the area median income, or $99,000.
Fairfax County is distributing information about the potential evictions in both English and Spanish, and staff are going door to door, Sampson said. She described unresponsive occupants in about one in seven units as “typical.”
“Overall, we’ve had a pretty good response,” she said.
wflook@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
10:33 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 5, 2008 re: "Fairfax Co. threatens to evict non-responsive tenants"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Fairfax board nixes move to put employees in new apartment complexes"
Report as inappropriate
7:39 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 18, 2007
re: "Fairfax to spend $100M on apartment complex"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Is this a "light of day" step? Are we subsidizing illegals in these dwellings? Hold the CHAIRMAN accountable for his POLITICAL actions with tax payer's money.
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There are better ways to provide funds to county employees to help them with the "high" cost of living in Fairfax County. Just look into the details of this expensive, to the tax payer, project. (Lost Real Estate Taxes and sweetheart deals.) The tax payers in Fairfax County must wake up and see where the "one penny" Real Estate taxes allocated to affotdable housing is really going. These DEALS should see the "light of day" in the tax payers eyes.
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why is Connolly using taxpayer money to pay double the assessed value for this apartment complex? This deserves a follow up story. Wouldn't it be cheaper to build new units on County owned property? Who owns this complex now and who are they related to? Are County assessments that far off?
111 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree