Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Under a proposed new law drafted by the Department of the Environment, it would become mandatory for “all persons in San Francisco” to separate recyclable and compostable material from trash. Mayor Gavin Newsom had announced in April that he planned to start issuing fines to encourage recycling.
If the ordinance is adopted by the Board of Supervisors, The City’s army of private trash collectors would be charged with peering into curbside bins to check for paper, plastic, glass and food before hauling away the waste.
People who mix recyclable or compostable waste with their trash under the draft law could have their garbage collection withheld after two warnings. They would also be liable for fines of up to $1,000 for repeat offenses. Building managers would be required to provide color-coded recycling and composting containers for their tenants. If tenants do not recycle, property managers could be liable for the fines.
Most San Francisco residents live in multi-unit buildings with shared garbage bins, said Sean Pritchard, government affairs manager at the San Francisco Apartment Association. He said the draft new law would impose “absurd” requirements on apartment owners.
“It’s ridiculous to think that the landlord is going to police the garbage intake and the recycling intake,” Pritchard said. “Are we expecting the owners to rifle through the garbage?”
Environment Department recycling program manager Robert Haley acknowledged that it will be hard to know “who’s putting exactly what materials in the containers” of multi-unit buildings, and he pledged some flexibility in the law’s enforcement.
“We just want the management to put the recycling and composting containers in place and we want them to educate their tenants,” Haley said.
The ordinance includes sweeping provisions that would also force restaurants and event organizers to make trash-sorting “convenient” for their customers. Restaurants that provide recycling and composting containers would be exempt from city laws requiring them to provide trash cans.
The Mayor’s Office is hopeful that the program will lift The City’s recycling and composting rate from 70 percent today to 75 percent by 2010 — a goal established by the Board of Supervisors.
“We believe mandatory recycling can get us to the next level,” spokesman Joe Arellano said.
The 75 percent target is not expected to be reached by 2010 if recycling remains voluntary, according to Environment Department documents.
A look at San Francisco’s recycling efforts
$500 Maximum fine for violating any rule under the proposed draft law
$750 Maximum fine for violating the same rule twice within one year
$1,000 Maximum fine for violating the same rule three times within one year
2 million Tons of waste generated in San Francisco each year
660,000 Tons of waste sent from San Francisco to landfill in 2006
36% of waste sent from San Francisco to landfill that could be recycled
31% of waste sent from San Francisco to landfill that could be composted
15 million Tons of capacity The City owns at the Altamont Landfill
12 million Tons of San Francisco waste already at the landfill
5 Years for San Francisco to fill its landfill quota at current recycling rates
Source: San Francisco Department of the Environment



Comments from Examiner Readers
3:16 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 2, 2008 re: "Trash a bottle, face a fine"
Report as inappropriate
4:50 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008
re: "Trash a bottle, face a fine"
Report as inappropriate
3:13 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008
re: "Trash a bottle, face a fine"
Report as inappropriate
1:13 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008
re: "Trash a bottle, face a fine"
Report as inappropriate
12:39 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008
re: "Trash a bottle, face a fine"
Report as inappropriate
12:35 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008
re: "Trash a bottle, face a fine"
Report as inappropriate
10:30 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008
re: "Trash a bottle, face a fine"
Report as inappropriate
9:52 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008
re: "Trash a bottle, face a fine"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
This is absurd. How will we ever become the perfect recyclers? There is the trouble of having to determine the little variations of what to recycle and what not to recycle. There are many variations such as a single window envelop with the plastic covering for a window or aluminum foil with food on it. Does the envelop go in the paper bin or in the plastic bin? Does the aluminum foil go in the trash bin or the recycle bin? You would need to educate everyone before you can enforce such a rule.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Gretchen - just do what I do recycle all of the plastic and let them figure it out.
2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
I make a strong effort to recycle but one problem I have is that the criteria for recycling some plastic is vague. For example, many food items come in plastic containers but I can never remember which can be recycled. It would be nice if Sunset Scavenger would create peal and stick labels to put on trash containers that list which plastics go where. Almost all of the plastics now have an assigned number printed on the plastic to identify the plastic composition. It is usually a logo shaped as a triangle of recycle arrows with a number from 1 to 5. I'd like to see a list - or better yet a sticker or decal on trash containers that says "Yes on 1, 3, 4" or whatever the numbers are. Or, "Do not recycle Number 1, 3, 4 in this bin" Something that allows us to figure out what can be included. Ditto on the Green Bin - for example, are the waxed cardboard food containers used for some TV meals considered as recycle or material or compost material.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader Nelson Marans said:
Let us hope that the new proposed fine system for mixing recyclable material from regular garbage remains in San Francisco. As much as I appreciate the message, I would hate to see my personal garbage, including shredded or unshredded correspondence and records, exposed to the prying eyes of trash collectors. Very truly yours, Nelson Marans Silver Spring, Md
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
SFWageEarner&TaxPayer said:
I live in an apartment building where the landlord would try to tack on a fee if they were fined. One example of where this is a difficult situation is that I was dumping the recyclables into the closed blue recycle bin and while trying to hold open its lid, one small item the open regular trash bin next to it. I am under 5 feet in height. I could not reach, climb into or tip it to retrieve it without risking my life. There are too many variables that would cause people to be fined where their intentions were good in recycling, but something happens afterwards that leaves them to be blamed for something they didn't intend to do.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Rejoh said:
Mayor Newsom is going to start issuing fines! What's he going to do, walk down Ellis St. and hand out tickets if a coke can is in the wrong bin? Take a dump next to a bin, no problem, put the wrong trash in a bin, $1000 fine. Way to go with the priorities.
6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What about vengeful neighbors or random street pedestrians who intentionally place bottles and/or trash in someone else's bins? There's no way to police that the trash in someone's bin actually belongs to the owner of that bin. This law is ludicrous and just another governmental big-brother scheme to collect more taxpayer dollars!
8 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Doesn't Norcal and the City operate a dirty sorting facility for all waste collected anyway? How is this going to impact anything, other than creating a weird enforcement dynamic between a contracted waste collector and residents of this city, who already pay outrageously high prices for collection?
7 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree