Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
San Mateo County (Map, News) - Stanford University has submitted plans for a 33-acre satellite campus in Redwood City that would become the prestigious school’s first location outside of the immediate Palo Alto community.
No classes would likely be offered at the “Stanford in Redwood City” campus, but it would include up to 12 medical and administrative office buildings. The campus would be near the 11-acre outpatient medical facility currently being constructed on 450 Broadway adjacent to U.S. Highway 101.
Possible occupants of the site include the School of Medicine, the chief financial officer, IT services, three “major” components of the library, the office of research and administration, the department of business affairs, academic “start-up” ventures and continuing education departments, according to the university.
“Over time, the list of groups that will relocate to Stanford in Redwood City will evolve and grow,” the university said in its application to the city.
The 1.53 million-square-foot project would triple the size of the existing Stanford property and include up to five parking structures with 5,100 spaces.
“It’s an excellent community to potentially be a member of,” said Jean McCown, Stanford’s director of community relations. “It’s seven miles away [from Palo Alto].”
The project was submitted in late May and the Redwood City Planning Commission recently kicked off its approval process, recommending the City Council approve a lengthy process that will require rezoning the area.
The council will approve or deny the process in mid-August, and reports will be done for about one year before any construction can begin, senior planner Maureen Riordan said.
The planning process will determine the effects the campus would have on nearby traffic, homes and businesses, Riordan said.
A new onramp could be built to provide the campus with direct access to Highway 101, the city said.
The 46-acre plot of land is zoned for “light industrial” uses. It used to host the Mid-Point Technology campus, which housed offices and technology companies. In addition to the outpatient facility, Genentech also owns a 2.29-acre property there.
The project likely would supply some money to the city in the short term, but the facility would not provide property taxes to the city, so no long-term benefits are expected for city coffers, Riordan said.
Vice Mayor Diane Howard said her peers are still debating the issue of rezoning the area and was not able to comment on the project’s future.
“Stanford is obviously a wonderful university and very helpful to the community,” Howard said.
33 Acres of new campus
11 Acres of outpatient facility being constructed on site
1.525 million Size of new campus in square feet
360,000 Square feet of outpatient facility
5,100 Parking spaces
12 Buildings
Source: Redwood City Planning Department



Comments from Examiner Readers
9:08 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008 re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
10:26 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
6:16 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
3:29 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
3:08 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
12:49 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
10:31 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Dickey: Stanford’s success rides on admissions standards"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
It won't matter to Stanfurd what they do in football and basketball [men's] as long as they continue to pile up the points in the suburban sports and continue to win the Sear's Cup. The 2 sports don't add enough points to be meaningful for them to want to change their approach.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Puzzled, The point is whether or not Stanford does indeed have such high admissions standards they we cannot compete in sports. I made the point that some people with rather questionable 'smarts' have been admitted...Condi being a case in point. Based upon her political acumen, I'd rather have Brooke Lopez representing us in foreign affairs.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Puzzled said:
Perhaps I'm not informed but what does Condi Rice have anything to do with athletics?
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am a Stanford Graduate, class of 1999, and am the one who posted the Condi Rice comment. In fact, I'm also a graduate of the Standord Business School Class of 2006.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Your comment on Condi Rice shows you wouldn't have a chance at getting admitted to Stanford.
6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
John, Lafayette said:
I once heard Mike Montgomery say on that he was chagrined when he once lost a player because of Stanford's admission standards. So where did that player go? Yale. Could it be that Stanford is so noble because they have more than enough money to fund the other sports so they don't need winners or sell outs of football and basketball.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I guess Stanford tightened its academic standards after Condi Rice was admitted.
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree