California News

Los Angeles Times - 1 hr 25 mins ago
Los Angeles Times - 1 hr 25 mins ago
Los Angeles Times - 1 hr 25 mins ago

Multimedia News

LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...
PETA gets naked and bloody again
16 photos
Partially clothed protesters seen with taped ...
Cute dogs, bulls and a green polar bear
15 photos
Dogs wait in line to be blessed during a bles...
High School Musical 3 Debate: Tisdale vs. Hudgens
20 photos
U.S. actress Ashley Tisdale arrives for the B...
Sexiest men alive
20 photos
In this July 25, 2008 file photo, San Diego C...

Attorneys say some of Currie’s votes may not have violated ethics rules

Jul 24, 2008 12:00 AM (79 days ago) by Jaime Malarkey, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - At least some of the votes cast by Maryland state Sen. Ulysses Currie benefiting his employer — detailed in a search warrant affidavit made public this week — appear to fall within state ethics guidelines, attorneys said Wednesday.

 In the affidavit released at the request of media organizations Tuesday, an FBI special agent said Currie improperly voted for bills that increased taxes for retailers. But the legislation benefited the grocery industry as a whole, not just Currie’s employer, Shoppers Food Warehouse.

“It’s only when a bill is specific to a legislator in his business capacity or his employer, either exclusively or part of a very small group of people, does the question of whether or not to recuse himself ever come up,” said William Somerville, ethics adviser to the General Assembly. “Farmers vote on agriculture and bankers vote on banking.”

Currie, 70, had 320 phone contacts with employees of Shoppers Food Warehouse and its parent company, SuperValu, since 2004, according to an affidavit. The lawmaker, who worked as a consultant for the Lanham-based chain, apparently reported the income on his tax returns, but not on required financial disclosure forms.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Federal agents, who conducted surveillance on Currie and raided his home May 29, are investigating possible mail and wire fraud and the “deprivation of the intangible right to honest services,” according to the affidavit. Former Maryland Gov. Marvin Mandel was convicted under the same statutes, but the conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court, according to one of the attorneys who helped exonerate him, Albert Figinski.

“The dishonest services accusation is what sent a number of politicians to jail,” Figinski said. “It’s tripped a number of politicians.”

According to the affidavit, Currie repeatedly voted to oppose reductions of sales tax discounts to retail vendors such as supermarkets. 

Barry F. Scher, a lobbyist for Giant Food, said he recalls working on the same legislation and knew Currie worked for Shoppers.

“I had been told that in passing,” Scher said. “I just shrugged my shoulders and kept moving.”

Currie helped facilitate a new Shoppers store at the recently redeveloped Mondawmin Mall, which received state subsidies, according to the document. He spoke frequently with company executives in 2005, when a bill allowing the transfer of a liquor license from one Shoppers store to another was before his committee.

Maryland GOP leaders seized the release of the affidavit as an opportunity to renew their calls for Currie to step down as chairman of the powerful Budget and Taxation Committee.

“While Currie has not yet been charged with a federal crime, he has clearly violated state ethics laws by hiding his employment as a lobbyist for a large supermarket chain,” state GOP chairman James Pelura said in a statement.

Currie declined comment.

jmalarkey@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

4:22 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 12, 2008 re: "Attorneys say some of Currie’s votes may not have violated ethics rules"

Examiner Reader said:
Can anyone explain the difference between what Currie supposedly did with Shoppers Stores and what Peter Franchot did with Safeway?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:49 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008 re: "Attorneys say some of Currie’s votes may not have violated ethics rules"

Frank from Parkville said:
I love it..."some"...that means SOME did violate ethics laws. Why don't we focus on those???

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:58 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "Shoppers paid Currie at least $207,000, affidavit data shows"

Examiner Reader said:
Nothing will happen to these people , and yes they will always receive there great bennefits and pensions without losing any for punishment.They are a disgrace to the taxpayer.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:55 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "Shoppers paid Currie at least $207,000, affidavit data shows"

Examiner Reader said:
Maybe he was calling in his prescriptions 320 times.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:39 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "Shoppers paid Currie at least $207,000, affidavit data shows"

Examiner Reader said:
What a sleezy, jerk off man.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:30 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Affidavit: Maryland Sen. Ulysses Currie, Shoppers talked on phone 320 times"

The Undertaker said:
A corrupt Maryland politician? I can't imagine such a thing. Maybe he can share a bunk with Bromwell.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:37 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Affidavit: Maryland Sen. Ulysses Currie, Shoppers talked on phone 320 times"

Internet said:
LOL, accoridng to these skewed commnets, Republicans are saints!!! Ahhh, cognitive dissonance, a favorite of Republican lemmings everywhere.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:02 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Affidavit: Maryland Sen. Ulysses Currie, Shoppers talked on phone 320 times"

Examiner Reader said:
I hope they nail him to the wall.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:56 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Affidavit: Maryland Sen. Ulysses Currie, Shoppers talked on phone 320 times"

Examiner Reader said:
This just goes to show that African-Americans have reached quality with the rest of the American power structure. They are now as corrupt as everyone else. Way to go. Morons!

2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:02 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Affidavit: Maryland Sen. Ulysses Currie, Shoppers talked on phone 320 times"

Examiner Reader said:
This is what happens in a state that is one party.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:37 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Examiner Reader said:
Sen. Ulysses Currie failed to file annual disclosure forms in 1988, 1995 and 2003 and was twice officially reprimanded by the state’s ethics commission, according to letters documenting the complaints between the Prince George’s County Democrat and commission officials. He is clearly unethical, and should be forced to resign.

3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:54 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Currie intervened for Shoppers, released e-mails, records show"

Examiner Reader said:
Sheila and O'Malley both SUCK !!!!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:08 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Examiner Reader said:
Guess the Sheila Dixon indictment is at a stand still. Always believed it would be impossible to incriminate Dixon without incriminating O'Malley,so both will continue to go free for their illegal contract awards, pension funds, campaign finance violations, cooking books, etc. Dale Clark convicted. UTECH CEO convicted, still no word on Sheila Dxon.

7 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:18 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Examiner Reader said:
It's so comforting to know that someone as corrupt as Currie is Chairman of the Budget and Taxation Committee. Another example of corruption in Annapolis.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:09 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

johnn said:
i agree ,no one is going after martin omalley,shawn malone,shelia dixson,walter tuffy of iid,maria corman,lawyer for martin omalley,karen hoening,lawer for martin omalley,mary olierman,debbie owens..all thease people that have lied,summited false docment,and destroyed document..no one seems to have guts enough to go after them

8 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:07 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Examiner Reader said:
I take back every thing I said about this guy - He is that stupid.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:07 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Examiner Reader said:
I don't really care whether the FBI goes after Currie. But, what bothers me is I'd bet my last dollar that he is no more corrupt than Mike Miller, O'Malley, or Sheila Dixon. I wish the FBI would focus on the worst culprits.

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:48 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Examiner Reader said:
This is to reporter Jamie Malarky. There is a difference between failing to file afinancial disclosure and filing late and paying a late penalty. Did Currie "fail" to file, meaning to date the Ethics Commission has received none of these prior reports, or did he simply file late and pay a penalty. The heading of your article may be a tad misleading. Perhaps not. But, in my view, there is a significant difference between "an ethics complaint" that a legislator has committed and unethical act and "an ethicscoplaint" that he filed a report late and paid a fine. Just as there is a difference betwwen faile to file tax returns and filing a return late and paying a late penalty. I happen to believe reporters should be held to a high standard of integrity and ethics when reporting news.

6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:39 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Grocery chain donated heavily to Ulysses Currie during liquor license dispute with county"

Examiner Reader said:
Harry, I agree. Being a legislator should be a full-time job with a full-time reasonable salary, and outside employment should be banned during the term of service. Legislators should have full-time, or at least 9 months of the year to handle the business of the state and serve their constituents. They should be forced to file public annual reports about legislation they supported and opposed and how they voted. These reports should be sent to every registered voter in their district.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:35 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Examiner Reader said:
Currie has repeated ethics violations and nothing happens. The Maryland Ethic Commission is a fraud. The voters need to revolt.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Grocery chain donated heavily to Ulysses Currie during liquor license dispute with county"

Harry said:
@ Casa de MD: So, because Currie helps you, you think nothing should be done when he A) repeatedly violates ethics laws that clearly display his corruption, and 2) Ignore that he has illegal drug substances in his home, possibly for distribution? My God, you liberals play fast a loose with the law when it comes to yourselves. Very telling, it is.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:31 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Harry said:
It's high time (no pun intended) that the MD legislature became a full-time body. Currently, the legislators only serve 3 months, with each delegate/senator having employment outside of that. Ethics rules should force them to give up their jobs and work full-time for the people of MD. This step begins to remove conflicts of interest, which they all have. However, in Currie's case, because he has been repeated cited for the same issue, he seems to be incaple of respecting what "recuse" means. As I've said before, throw them all out. They're all corrupt.

5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:52 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Currie subject of prior ethics complaints"

Examiner Reader said:
currie, like most maryland poiticians is probally a greedy crook. hope th fbi makes a good case and currie gets to share a cell with tommy bromwell.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:00 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "SuperValu’s political reach emerges after raids reveal other contributions"

justdafacts said:
For balance the story should have mentioned that SuperValu favored Gov. Ehlich over Gov. O'Malley in the last election, having given Gov. Ehrlich $2,000 and Gov. O'Malley only $500. Only after Gov. O'Malley unseated Gov. Ehrlich did SuperValu contribute $3,000 to Gov. O'Malley's campaign.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:56 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 3, 2008 re: "Grocery chain donated heavily to Ulysses Currie during liquor license dispute with county"

Examiner Reader said:
The FBI has nothing better to do? I can think of a million people to be investigated, and Ulysess Currie is NO WHERE on the list...leave him aloneeeeeeeee!!!!!!!

6 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:26 AM MST on Sun., Jun. 1, 2008 re: "Ulysses Currie has clout in Maryland Senate"

Examiner Reader said:
Stop the injustice. We need his vote for our funding next year! Thanks, Gus, Kim, Kerry, and all the hard workers from Casa De Maryland

3 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:21 AM MST on Sun., Jun. 1, 2008 re: "Grocery chain donated heavily to Ulysses Currie during liquor license dispute with county"

Examiner Reader said:
Please leave this man alone, he fights the good fight! Thank you, Gus Kerry, Kim and all the hard workers at Casa De Maryland

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:49 PM MST on Sat., May. 31, 2008 re: "FBI agents search state senator’s home, serve warrant at supermarket offices"

Examiner Reader said:
Keep voting them in folks. They get richer and make us poorer.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:45 PM MST on Sat., May. 31, 2008 re: "FBI agents search state senator’s home, serve warrant at supermarket offices"

Examiner Reader said:
There's nothing to see here-look the other way.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:24 AM MST on Sat., May. 31, 2008 re: "Grocery chain donated heavily to Ulysses Currie during liquor license dispute with county"

Examiner Reader said:
A democrat under investigation in this state? Say it ain't so!

{slowly Ulysses Currie reaches into his back pocket with his left hand. Just beyond his butt-cheek he finds it! THE RACE CARD! Don't let the feds raid without it! He'll be off scott-free with no issue. They might even name a school after him.

5 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:29 AM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008 re: "Feds raid home of prominent Maryland senator"

Examiner Reader said:
Another Liberal Democrat that raises your taxes but does not pay his. Throw the book at him.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:32 AM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008 re: "FBI agents search state senator’s home, serve warrant at supermarket offices"

Examiner Reader said:
He didn't pay his taxes.The IRS was there and was not reported!

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:06 AM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008 re: "FBI agents search state senator’s home, serve warrant at supermarket offices"

Examiner Reader said:
Well Well a Maryland dem. in trouble with the FBI. Not surprised. Maybe Miller can help him!

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement