CHANGE MY LOCATION
Local
California News
Multimedia News
Fairfax board nixes move to put employees in new apartment complexes
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors shot down a proposal Monday to fill a planned 270-unit apartment complex on the grounds of the county government center solely with county employees, partly on the basis that the county would lose millions of dollars in federal housing subsidies by doing so.
The board’s two-man Republican minority clashed with their colleagues over the purpose of the proposed Residences at the Government Center, which they said was sold on the prospect of finding living space for firefighters, teachers and policemen, when in reality the tenants also would be from the private work force.
Officials have long worried that too many low- and middle-income county staff, especially those involved with public safety, have been forced into neighboring jurisdictions because of Fairfax’s high housing prices, a problem exacerbated by more than $4-per-gallon gas.
“Promises were made to the surrounding community that this project was for county employees only,” said Springfield District Supervisor Pat Herrity, a Republican who made the motion to restrict the units. “Furthermore, it is consistently being billed by this board as housing for county employees.”
Instead, the board’s majority resolved only that the units would be “primarily marketed” to the county’s roughly 12,000 county employees, making no commitment to actually house them there. Herrity and Sully District Supervisor Michael Frey opposed that measure.
“I just don’t think that we should make exclusions and say that those who are not county employees are not worthy to be residents at this location,” said Hunter Mill District Supervisor Cathy Hudgins, a Democrat.
Restricting the tenants would render the project ineligible for a $2.5 million federal tax credit, county officials said.
Fairfax County is in talks with Texas developer JPI to lease the 9-acre site behind the sprawling government center along Monument Drive. If a contract is approved, the company would seek to rezone, design, build and finance the entire project, said JPI Development Manager Ruth Hoang. She said the building would be made up entirely of rental units.
wflook@dcexaminer.com
Comments from Examiner Readers
10:33 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 5, 2008 re: "Fairfax Co. threatens to evict non-responsive tenants"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "Fairfax board nixes move to put employees in new apartment complexes"
Report as inappropriate
7:39 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 18, 2007
re: "Fairfax to spend $100M on apartment complex"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Is this a "light of day" step? Are we subsidizing illegals in these dwellings? Hold the CHAIRMAN accountable for his POLITICAL actions with tax payer's money.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There are better ways to provide funds to county employees to help them with the "high" cost of living in Fairfax County. Just look into the details of this expensive, to the tax payer, project. (Lost Real Estate Taxes and sweetheart deals.) The tax payers in Fairfax County must wake up and see where the "one penny" Real Estate taxes allocated to affotdable housing is really going. These DEALS should see the "light of day" in the tax payers eyes.
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why is Connolly using taxpayer money to pay double the assessed value for this apartment complex? This deserves a follow up story. Wouldn't it be cheaper to build new units on County owned property? Who owns this complex now and who are they related to? Are County assessments that far off?
109 agree | 71 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree