You are here: Los Angeles Sports
SPOTLIGHT | Sports
New England Patriots Examiner Sean Crowe has the answer.
More Hot Topics
NFL | College football
NBA | NHL | MLB

Los Angeles Examiners

Colin Ward-Henninger
Los Angeles Lakers Examiner
Most Recent Post
Lakers handle Suns: Five thoughts
Des Martini
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim Examiner
Most Recent Post
Angels shrewd in Francisco Rodriguez maneuvers
 
 

Multimedia News

Hollywood's hottest cougars
20 photos
Mariah Carey is 10 years older than her husba...
'Twilight' Mania
20 photos
In this image released by Summit Entertainmen...
Thanksgiving recipes
20 photos
Food & Drink Examiners are sharing a cornucop...
Hugh Jackman: Sexiest Man Alive (and a few close seconds)
20 photos
In this Nov. 10, 2008, file photo, actor Hugh...
Blondes vs. Brunettes
20 photos
Beyonce is photographed in New York on Thursd...

Bacsik playing, Bonds not

Jul 22, 2008 12:00 AM (123 days ago) by Phil Wood, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The last time the Nationals were in San Francisco, they split a four game series against the Giants. They also ended up on the front page of every newspaper in North America.

You might recall that evening last Aug. 7 when Giants’ left fielder Barry Bonds hit a fifth inning home run against Washington lefty Mike Bacsik that broke Henry Aaron’s all-time record. The game stopped for a few minutes for the appropriate ceremonies to take place, and Bonds left the game with his club ahead, 5-4. When it resumed, Bacsik retired the next two hitters to retire the side, and he was then batted for in the sixth. Oh, and the Nationals won the ballgame 8-6.

Not quite a year later, Barry Bonds seems to have actually “left the game.” The Giants wouldn’t re-sign him — they weren’t about to pay an 8-figure salary to a part-time, 44-year-old outfielder — even if he did post an OPS over 1.000. No one else stepped forward to sign him either, even after his agent indicated he’d consider playing for the minimum. Apparently there’s a “baggage” issue, and I don’t mean American Tourister.

Mike Bacsik, on the other hand, is still playing, though not where he’d hoped to be pitching in 2008. He was taken off the Nationals’ major league roster last fall, and signed another minor league contract with the club, the same as he’d done last year. In 2007, however, he got the call to the major leagues after 5 starts and 9 appearances with the Columbus Clippers, and a rather mundane 1-3 record with a 4.00 ERA. He’d go on to make 8 quality starts for Washington, not including the Aug. 7 game.

This story continues below
Advertisement

This year Mike’s resumed the middle relief role for Columbus; he’s not started a game all season. In 29 relief appearances he leads the club in wins with 7, with a 4.58 ERA. He’s not the closer, but he’s tied for the club lead in appearances, and has struck out 45 in 55 innings of work. It doesn’t knock your eye out, but he’s shown durability, and some degree of consistency.

Mike was all over the media after allowing the Bonds’ home run. He’s a solid interview, and a few nattering nabobs thought he was enjoying the moment a little too much. Some even suggested he’d grooved the pitch the Bonds. Hey, it was 3-2 pitch and a long at-bat, and anyone who knows Mike knows he respects the game far too much to do anything like that. He didn’t pursue the media last August — they went after him once it became apparent he’d give them the time without a sigh and a snarl. His engaging demeanor earned him some face time doing postseason analysis on ESPN, a gig he likely would’ve paid them to do. He’s a sports talk radio junkie, and can hold his own talking about any sport, not just the one he plays. OK, he’s also a Cowboys fan, but nobody’s perfect.

I admit I’m a little biased about Bacsik. He co-hosted the radio show with me a couple of times last year, and seems to have his head screwed on correctly. I know how much he wanted to take the mound in the new ballpark, and I hope he gets the opportunity, at least when rosters expand in September. He’s not a major leaguer at the moment, but at least someone wanted him this year.

Which is more than you can say about Barry Bonds.

Phil Wood is a contributor to Nats Xtra on MASN. Contact him at philwood@dcexaminer.com.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

11:55 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Will Guzman get a chance to twinkle?"

Gary (Olney) said:
Phil, are you gone from WTEM? Dan Snyder buys the station and the way he finds to improve it is to get rid of you? Is he nuts? You were the best thing that happened to that station. I loved taking my dog for a nice two hour walk on Saturday mornings when I would invariably hear stories about my favorite Senators (Bennie Daniels, Tom Cheney, Ken Hunt) or about my favorite local bands (Nils Lofgren). You will be missed a lot.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:36 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 2, 2008 re: "Interleague play in need of fixing"

Cal said:
Now we can add Matt Chico also. And yet no one wants to listen to Dr. Mike Marshall.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:28 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008 re: "Interleague play in need of fixing"

Cal said:
Phil, I go back with you when you did the updates at :15 and :45 way back when. Is there any concern with all the pitcher's arms the Nationals are blowing out? First Patterson, now Cordero and probably Hill also? What is the purpose of having surgery when they come back with the same motion that caused the problem in the first place? Isn't that the definition of insanity?

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:45 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "An attendance issue? Not so fast my friend"

Examiner Reader said:
You're right on Phil. The biggest problem I see is one you brought up, the prices are ridiculous. I for one will not go to the new stadium until they drop their ridiculous prices. Dee Shannon

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement