Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Editor’s note: This is part of an ongoing series that profiles top-level county officials concerning their counties and what the future holds.
Harford County Executive David Craig, 59, is serving his first full term, after finishing Jim Harkins’ term in 2005 and being elected to the position in 2006. A lifelong Harford County resident, Craig has been a Havre de Grace city councilman, a five-term mayor, a state delegate, a state senator and a school principal. He sat down with The Examiner to discuss schools, Base Realignment and Closure and the county’s continuing expansion.
How did you feel about Gov. Martin O’Malley’s appointment of two people to the school board, despite different recommendations from county officials?
I really don’t get involved in appointments, but it’s probably going to make [County Councilman and liaison to the school board] Dick Slutzky push even harder for an elected school board, since neither of the two people were selected by his interview and recommendation process. I was impressed by Alysson [Krchnavy]. She’s been very involved. But I don’t think Dick’s going to be happy with [Leonard Wheeler, who ran against Slutzky in 2006] for the other spot.
The governor’s office supposedly sought letters of recommendation from local leaders. You weren’t asked for your picks?
I don’t get asked directly on very many appointments. The previous governor did, but this governor hasn’t. We usually get called and are told what happened.
How do you respond to citizens’ concerns that a project to revise the county’s zoning code has been done behind closed doors?
The fact is, this has been a two-year process, and it’s probably been the most open and transparent process for passing a piece of legislation that we’ve ever had. We’ve had 24 public work sessions, with a work group that’s evenly balanced. We’ve had three public work sessions with the council and three public hearings with the citizens. People say it was developer-driven, but I would say of the maybe 200 issues they’ve discussed, there were only six or seven that came down to some division between the development and non-development communities. I think there’s some lack of understanding among citizens about what the purpose of this code rewrite was.
What was the purpose of the revision process?
The biggest misunderstanding is that 75 to 80 percent of this was textual: moving things around, cleaning up the 25-year-old code and eliminating conflicts in the code that were created as legislation was passed. Some issues [like transferring development rights and the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance] I’m probably going to leave to the County Council. The council’s spoken over the last few years about how it feels on APF. If they want to change their minds, that’s another thing.
How do you respond to criticism from smart-growth advocates that the work group was stacked in the developers’ favor?
People who have made comments about it will say the development community has its agenda. Everybody promotes their own interests. But unfortunately, the people on the other side won’t admit they have an agenda. They work hard at it they’re committed to it, and they’re passionate about it, but they don’t see their lack of objectivity in it.
Where is Harford in its preparation for anticipated BRAC growth?
Everything that’s key will be completed by the fall of 2010 and the winter of 2011, so we’re right on track. We’ll start groundbreaking for the water plant expansion in the fall of this year, and that’ll be completed in two years. The school construction, particularly two new elementary schools and the high school expansions, are on course to open in the fall of 2010, so that opens back up the areas that have been closed to development by Adequate Public Facilities laws. For the most part, Harford County has done an excellent job getting ready for it. Are we ready today? No, but we don’t have to be ready today. We’ll be ready when it’s time.
What about collaborative efforts with the state and federal governments?
When you look at the amount of money the federal government gives out for planning, Harford County has been the most successful jurisdiction in the country. We’ve gotten 13 percent of the money the Office of Economic Adjustment has given to local jurisdictions. If you figure there are 20 communities that are gaining because of BRAC, your average should be 5 percent, and we’re
2 1/2 times that average. At the state level, I still don’t see the dollars that should be there for infrastructure. I still don’t see the state picking up its share of school construction. I still don’t see the state picking up its share when it comes to roads. I don’t see them making that commitment.
Surveys from Fort Monmouth, N.J., say most workers aren’t interested in moving. How does that affect your plans?
I believe those numbers are changing dramatically, constantly. Obviously, there will be some people who aren’t going to move no matter what. But they’re not going to find another $100,000-a-year job. As one contractor said to me, “When I start waving these paychecks, people are going to swallow their pride and come.”
Will Harford require more residential development to accommodate those people?
No. The economy shows there are houses out there that could be on the market, especially for the first two waves of people who are moving in this year and next year. I think those people are going to find a glut of housing in more established communities that they can afford to buy. And I think they will.
How is the declining economy affecting Harford County’s bottom line?
Tax revenue, mainly for capital projects, is declining, especially the transfer tax on home sales and the recordation tax. Income tax is still pretty steady, [and] property tax is relatively strong, although I think we’ll see some erosion in that. I don’t think you’ll see the jump in property tax assessments that you’ve seen in the last couple of years.
Is Harford going to follow other counties in boosting the budget by raising parking fees or cutting fuel costs by turning off vehicles instead of idling them?
We continue to watch our expenditures — we’ve always done that. Those little things are things people say to grab attention. Every time there’s an energy crisis, they say the same things. They’re all glitzy things, like when Lyndon Johnson was going around taking light bulbs out of the closets, and it’s like, “OK, how much energy did you actually save by doing that?” It makes everybody look good and feel good, but that’s all. Hopefully, we operate frugally enough anyway. We had hybrid vehicles before any other county. We just don’t have to grab the headlines.



Comments from Examiner Readers
6:36 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "In Harford, everything is right on schedule"
Report as inappropriate
10:10 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008
re: "In Harford, everything is right on schedule"
Report as inappropriate
7:50 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "In Harford, everything is right on schedule"
Report as inappropriate
3:52 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008
re: "In Harford, everything is right on schedule"
Report as inappropriate
8:14 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 21, 2008
re: "In Harford, everything is right on schedule"
Report as inappropriate
6:58 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 21, 2008
re: "In Harford, everything is right on schedule"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I think I would be a good follow up article to introduce and identify all members of the Zoning Code Update Committee selected by County Executive David Craig, with a brief history of their jobs and affiliations. It would show how the citizens of Harford County were represented in important decisions for their quality of life
7 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Harford County Board of Education voted several weeks ago to put a magnet school in Bel Air School which is going to decrease the number of spots for districted students right in the middle of the development envelope. Additionally, C Milton Wright is projected to be overcrowded and where are those students going to go when Bel Air is overcrowded with magnet students and less classroom space in the new building? If we are keeping development in the development envelope, someone needs to tell the Board that because they don't see a problem with it. It seems to me like they are trying to push kids and development out to North Harford since that is one of the few areas in the county with capacity.
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mr. Craig basically says in one sentence that there are more than enough houses on the market to take care of the BRAC newcomers. He also says when two more schools are built and one is expanded, more areas can be opened up for development - why? Do they intend to redistrict the student population again and bus them all over the county at great cost? Harford also has more than sufficient commercially zoned property sitting vacant. Harford is an example of yet another county that is in need of judicious redevelopment in defined areas where the infrastructure is already in place in an effort to prevent sprawl. It should be looking at providing transit facilities to enable its residents to access residential, workplace and commercial areas easily. It should be doing everything in its power to "go green" in an effort to clean up its environment from pollutants and should do far, far more to protect its waterways from overzealous development. Until then, Harford isn't ready at all.
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a long time Harford resident, I must disagree with some of Mr. Craig's statement regarding the P&Z code rewrite. While the public could attend the rewrite work group sessions, they could not contribute. Yes, there were three P&Z Department public workshops which, at least in my opinion, were poorly attended by the citizens. To date, there have been NO public hearings on the planning and zoning code rewrite. There should be at least six, not three, well-advertised public hearings prior to code approval and prior to the comprehensive rezoning which undoubtedly will commence before the ink has dried on the approving legislation. The public hearings should also be spaced out sufficiently both in time and location so that the public has more than sufficient opportunity to attend and provide input on such an important document. There should be a mandate that public coments will be made a part of the record and will, additionally, be posted on the County's website.
6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
how come this county does not have any minorities in its government department heads, or school boards, county council? The NAACP clearly does not have any influence in this county's executive, legislative, or school board. This school board is a joke, just a yes Ms. Haa's body, that never thinks of new ideas or how to be more efficient with the taxpayers money. Instead of giving teachers a well deserve raise, they gave all principals and executive staff raises instead. They tried to take the raise that govt employees deserved after years of below inflation increases.
1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
50% of the county budget goes toward education and the taxpayers in Harford County have absolutely no say in how that money is being used because we have no elected school board. Probably the main reason none of the top selections got chosen was because they favor an elected board and Harford County Board of Education has taken a legislative stand against elected school boards for the past several years. Members of the current school board probably objected to anyone who favored elections and got that information to O'Malley. It's not about what was best for the students or taxpayers in Harford County, it was about who wouldn't rock the boat. Of course, the NAACP got to pick too...
5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree