Multimedia News

Rockefeller Center Christmas tree lights up
20 photos
People look on from office windows as the Roc...
Celestial love triangle
20 photos
The crescent moon is accompanied by planets V...
Britney's back with new album, tour
20 photos
Singer Britney Spears performs on ABC's 'Good...
World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...

Review: Streep saves ‘Mamma Mia!’

Jul 18, 2008 4:38 PM (138 days ago) by Anita Katz, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - In the dippy warp of anti-renaissance that was the 1970s, ABBA thrived, and, via fare such as “Mamma Mia!” — a new movie based on the play — the defunct pop supergroup continues to unleash its too-catchy songs on the world. Shift your mind-set into fluff mode, and this film should mildly satisfy. But an unoriginal, uneven presentation of the songbook and the sunshine hampers things considerably.

The movie’s a stream of ABBA numbers (by Benny Andersson and Bjorn Ulvaeus) with smidgens of a story inserted between them, courtesy of director Phyllida Lloyd and writer Catherine Johnson — first-time filmmakers reprising their theatrical roles. The setting is a photogenic Greek island. The star is Meryl Streep, who is thankfully unable to shelve her entire IQ as she sings, dances and transcends the script in the role of Donna.

Donna, a former rocker, runs a crumbling hotel and has a 20-year-old bride-to-be daughter, Sophie (Amanda Seyfried). Sophie, unbeknownst to Donna, invites three of Donna’s ex-boyfriends (Pierce Brosnan, Colin Firth, Stellan Skarsgard) to the wedding, believing that she’ll figure out which one is her father. The sight of the guys after all these years unnerves Donna. Let the title song begin.

Additional featured songs are “Dancing Queen,” “Waterloo,” “Super Trouper” and “The Winner Takes It All,” among others, performed in settings ranging from bedrooms to beaches. Key events include bachelor and bachelorette parties and a wedding climax where pronouncements and new couplings occur.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The movie has zest and energy. The bigger musical numbers, which include everything from flipper-clad beach-boy choruses to female islanders exhibiting “Dancing Queen” abandon, are particularly entertaining.

But too often, the film feels like an effort to reproduce a lucrative stage venture, with middling results. The choreography’s largely arm-flapping and jumping. The songs barely reflect the plot. The story’s dumb. The romantic elements lack juice.

Such shortcomings would sink the film were it not for Streep, who, in addition to singing adeptly and dancing heartily, brings dimension to her flimsily written character. She gives the mother-daughter element poignancy; her belting of “The Winner Takes It All” can’t redeem this second-rate song, but it conveys Donna’s emotional situation.

Brosnan, meanwhile, isn’t so vocally blessed, and when he opens his mouth and sings, he’s so wrong that you can only embrace his good sportsmanship and giggle at the silliness of this endeavor.

Better are Julie Walters and Christine Baranski as Donna’s best pals and former bandmates.

MOVIE REVIEW

Mamma Mia!

2½ stars

Starring: Meryl Streep, Pierce Brosnan, Julie Walters, Amanda Seyfried

Written by: Catherine Johnson

Directed by: Phyllida Lloyd

Rated: PG-13

Running time: 1 hour 48 minutes

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

7:29 PM MST on Wed., Dec. 3, 2008 re: "Review: A thrilling ‘Dark Knight’"

Examiner Reader said:
this movie iz d bomb!!!!!!!!!!!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

4:07 PM MST on Tue., Dec. 2, 2008 re: "Review: Sisters step it with style"

Examiner Reader said:
i love this movie alot.......................

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:20 PM MST on Sat., Nov. 22, 2008 re: "Review: Don’t go back to ‘10,000 B.C’"

Examiner Reader said:
MEL GIBSON'S NEXT MOVIE WILL BE ABOUT ACTUAL FACTS THAT THE JEWS MURDERED 6 MILLION NAZIS IN GAS CHAMBERS AND MANAGED TO COVER IT UP. IT'S NO SURPRISE THAT IRELAND AWARDED A FILM PRIZE TO MEL GIBSON, ANTI SEMITE AND ULTA RIGHT CATHOLIC.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:36 PM MST on Mon., Nov. 3, 2008 re: "Review: A thrilling ‘Dark Knight’"

The Late Night Toker said:
This was by far a top 50 movie of all time. It's hard to beat Jack Nicholson at (method) acting. (or even freakin anything probubly) Heath was and is and will always be a great actor. Come on, no straight man can kiss or have a love making scene with another man and make you believe it's true. The good die young! As Kurt Cobain quoted: It's better to burn out than fade away. Godspeed!

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:10 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 14, 2008 re: "Review: A thrilling ‘Dark Knight’"

Examiner Reader said:
if you dont like heath ledger.. die

14 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:06 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 12, 2008 re: "Review: A thrilling ‘Dark Knight’"

Gabi said:
Heath Ledger Is Amazing, Period .

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:35 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 6, 2008 re: "Review: A thrilling ‘Dark Knight’"

Linda Baker said:
I WAS IN TOTAL AWE OF HOW HE WAS ABLE TO GRAB EVERYONE'S ATTENTION WHEN HE IS ON THE SCREEN. Nobody should ever try to duplicate his act. I believe it was an Oscar winning performance.

6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:29 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 15, 2008 re: "Misfits and misspellings: ‘Son of Rambow’ is a sweet homage to 1980s"

Examiner Reader said:
the movie rawked;)

7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:18 PM MST on Sat., Sep. 6, 2008 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Barbara said:
orlando bloom is the hotest actor in pirates of the caribbean

27 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:15 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 1, 2008 re: "Review: Streep saves ‘Mamma Mia!’"

Examiner Reader said:
Bizarre movie! What a waste of time and money!

16 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:58 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008 re: "Review: Serviceable ‘X-Files’ stands alone"

Examiner Reader said:
the X-files should be filed under Y. the movie didn't make any sense or conformed to the t.v. series. it's about the unknown, the ufo thing. this was about sicky characters who like to cut up people and put them together like frankensteins.

15 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:41 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 20, 2008 re: "Review: Streep saves ‘Mamma Mia!’"

Examiner Reader said:
I liked the movie Mama Mia. I saw it with my daughter and thougt it was refreshing... so what that some didn't have thesinging voice but the laughter was always there. I recommend this movie to anyone who just wants to laugh and leave life for a short time. I am not one for musicals and was not happy that my daughter picked this but I was so glad she did!! FUN FUN FUN!!!!

16 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:55 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"

Examiner Reader said:
"Why, after an hour of pratfalls, try to reinvent Hancock as a somber second coming of the Caped Crusader? I like the idea of a disgraced superhero struggling to rehabilitate his image." This specific comment leads me to believe that you missed the point, and that you would rather drop a clever phrase in your own creation, your critique, than do your job as a critic and evaluate fully what was given to you (instead of "what if?") By the way, "Caped Crusader" is a name most often attributed to Bruce Wayne's alter ego, not the "aww, gee" squeaky clean Superman (which I believe is what you inferred). The ending, which focused on the familiar comic themes, of self sacrifice and the powers of the ordinary were very satisfying for this comic fan. The questions left unanswered in the movie are what number one issues are made of. I have a complaint: more of the title's credit should have been given to Bateman and Theron in my opinion. Hancock, albeit misnamed, was a great introduction.

19 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:46 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"

MrHyphy said:
Hancock is a good movie end of story.

22 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:59 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
just came back from seeing a movie that i thought would be great but it WAS SOME GARBAGE DON'T WAIST UR TIME OR MONEY VIA MOVIE THEATRE OR DVD

25 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:31 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
M. Knight is the modern day equivalent to Alfred Hithcock. I completely disagree with this review and her review of his last two movies. The Village was one his best movies, and The Lady in the Water was also a great movie. Some people just don't have minds capable of seeing outside the box and wondering what if. Case in point, Sally Kline.

25 agree | 26 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
The movie kicked ass!

25 agree | 24 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:22 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"

Examiner Reader said:
You, sir, are an idiot of the highest order.

23 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008 re: "Review: The girls are back in town"

Examiner Reader said:
Dear Ms. Katz, You are quite the bitch for revealing that "Big stands Carrie up at the = alter"! Gwen Evans

28 agree | 28 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:31 PM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008 re: "Review: Goin’ back to ‘Indiana’"

Examiner Reader said:
wow the review of the new Indiana Jones movie really over rates it--unlike the others it is ALL style and no substance. the movie has a return of karen allen but then does nothing with her; and what is this===Happy Days meets the X Files? it maybe but isnt an Indiana Jones movie.

32 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:32 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"

Examiner Reader said:
Cont...With regards to Battle for Haditha (see below): This 'rampage' point of view has been disproven. (3) There is evidence that these Marines were used as scapegoats to appease a liberal media and Anti-War sentiments in the Senate and govt like Murtha. There is evidence of undue command influence in the hubris investigation that ensued. The investigation was unprecedented. These Marines were asked to make split moment decisions under duress that most of us would be hard pressed to do differently under similar circumstances. Interesting fact from the think tank AEI: A poll of tribal leaders across Iraq was recently conducted about US elections and who they would vote for, McCain, Obama, or Clinton. A majority would vote for John McCain but in Al Anbar where Haditha occurred, the tribal leaders want to re-elect George Bush. The Iraqi leaders greatly fear us leaving b/c that would ensure the return of the henchmen who murdered and terrorized the locals. They want peace and stabilit

25 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:28 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"

Examiner Reader said:
With regards to Battle for Haditha: To imply this movie is an accurate representation of the Haditha incident is misguided and disingenuous. This movie is far from an accurate representation of what occurred but conjecture based on misinformation. The truth of what occurred and mistakes made are coming out now. So how did the director possibly know what really happened when he made this movie? These are what we do know now: (1) The incident was a set up from insurgents who were looking to create an Iraq massacre for political gain and as part of their information operations. Al Qaeda filmed the carnage and the American and world media appeased them. (2) There is evidence from drones that there were insurgents fleeing from the buildings the Marines cleared. The Marines who cleared the buildings were not targeting civilians and were following orders. Their intentions were to ensure their own safety and not from a desire to take revenge or go on some kind of rampage. This 'rampage' poin

27 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "No need for hollow, horribly acted ‘Speed’"

Examiner Reader said:
I have heard a lot of trash about this movie, but I have to disagree. I loved it. The part most people miss is that it stays true to the cartoon that inspired it. Sure, it is hokie, far-fetched and dated, but that's just the way the cartoon was! Besides, this show has a lot of action and happy ending. Who wouldn't like that?

26 agree | 26 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:00 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Review: Terrorism enters stoned age"

Examiner Reader said:
Pretty spot-on review, but critics (even Asian Ameircan critics, who are falling over themselves to celebrate the fact that Asians are starring in a mainstream hit movie without being, well, you know, ASIAN) including Examiner's are missing he huge red flag od sexism that permrates both ,ovies but this one even more so. Yeah, so that's part and parcel of the juvenile, hormone-drenched guy genre, but it doesn't excuse the over-the-top nature of this movie's juvenalia. It almsot negates both the empowring of Asian Americans AND the bits of smart political commentary casually tossed off throughout the dialogue. And BTW, Rossiter, there are no hyphens in "Indian American" and "Korean American."

26 agree | 35 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:18 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Nights’ can leave you feeling blue"

Melisa said:
The movie was alright - I enjoyed all the cinematic imagery, but I esp. loved the music in the film. I just bought the soundtrack and I can't stop listening to it - really great!

39 agree | 45 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:44 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Review: Caught in the net of 'Spiderwick’"

Examiner Reader said:
I read the books and I am an adult female that enjoys a good fantasy book without romance in it. Yes, the books are a bit different, but the story line moved quite well even though it was much different from the books. Well done. My whole family watched it and it was entertaining to us.

123 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:38 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Review: ‘Lions for Lambs’ more like medicine than a movie"

mandela said:
"Lions for lambs" is a colossal bore.

256 agree | 226 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:26 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Examiner Reader said:
Pirates of the Caribbean(all 3)have to be the best movies i have ever seen. This is an extremely harsh review of a completely AWEsome movie! I mean come on there had to be something this reviewer liked about it.

305 agree | 294 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:30 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 2, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Examiner Reader said:
RE: POTC3 - I found it to be highly entertaining-which is what a movie is supposed to be! Hey, some liked it, some didn't - so what? Johnny Depp made all 3 movies fun to watch (he IS very easy on the eyes)! A lot of people loved it - hence its popularity. Fantasy pictures are fun - much needed in today's world. There are many "serious" movies with plots so convoluted a person would leave the theater confused. With POTC a person could leave the theater laughing (hang the plots) and wanting more. I think sometimes even critics don't know what they want in a movie. But, you can bet your bottom dollar that if there's a POTC4 it'll be a hit - again, hang the "plots", bring on the characters and the FUN! And if the first 3 didn't float your boat then stay home!

332 agree | 327 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:18 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 1, 2007 re: "Unbalanced, powerful ‘Sicko’ a movie that matters"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree with Sally Kline's assessment of Michael Moore's documentary... the film left me thoroughly disgusted with the American healthcare system and disenchanted with the ways my fellow citizens and our policy makers are influenced by the almighty dollar. It's sad and pathetic, and no solution seems in sight...

588 agree | 398 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Jackie said:
I love4 you Johnny and please make more films with you as the pirate I think you are the greattest

607 agree | 381 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement