Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Rotting wood pilings and a crack-ridden foundation have forced the Ferry Building to close its parking lot, much to the chagrin of the landmark’s businesses and customers.
The lot sits on Pier ½, a 70-year-old structure that sits near the Ferry Building and has seen limited maintenance for decades. Though there are several other parking lots within a few blocks, the 100-car lot is the building’s primary parking option, serving hundreds of the landmark’s driving patrons each day.
The lot’s closure may quickly translate into losses for business owners and farmers-market merchants, if a quick solution isn’t found, said building manager Jane Connors.
Pier ½ is just one of at least 30 of The City’s piers in need of refurbishing — a project that would cost at least $1 billion along the 7½-mile stretch of waterfront. The rotting piers, which are overseen by the Port of San Francisco, are in need of seismic upgrades and port officials have said they are struggling to find funding sources to fix the crumbling piers. The Port does not receive money from The City and relies mostly on money from leases with tenants.
The Ferry Building was refurbished at a cost of $100 million and opened five years ago — and has since seen considerable success: about 15,000 people visit the shopping center most days. On Saturdays, when the Ferry Building hosts its bustling farmer’s market, that number reaches 25,000, said Connors.
The Port, which rents Pier ½ to the Ferry Building for parking, discovered the structural problems in May, and decided to schedule a September close of the pier before the next storm season, said Port spokeswoman Renee Dunn. However, further investigation proved the problems were much worse and the Ferry Building’s managers said they had no choice but to close the lot July 3.
Early estimates peg the cost to repair the pier at $3.6 million — probably too steep to be carried by the Port, which rents the lot for just $43,000 a year, said Port project manager Kathleen Diohep. To make matters worse, the pier is slated for demolition in a few years, so an expensive repair may not be justified, she said, and customers at the Ferry Building may never be able to park there again.
One proposed solution is to convert the large plaza behind the Ferry Building, which hosts the Farmer’s Market on Saturdays, into a parking lot. But she said that would be complicated, since the plaza is not zoned for parking.
The lot closure has not sat well with the patrons of The Slanted Door, said restaurant hostess Patricia Dang.
“Especially on Saturdays, it’s a nightmare,” she said. “People then come in late for reservations, we have to hold tables, or we’ll give tables away and customers are angry.”
Pier ½ is a 70-year-old structure in need of seismic upgrade
100 Parking spaces
$43,000 Rent the port receives
$3.6 million Cost of refurbishment
3 Years until pier is scheduled to be demolished
6 Metal plates installed in March, after the parking operator noticed the deck was slouching
Source: Port of San Francisco
My story
“The parking lot’s been there for a really long time, and a lot of our regulars have come to expect it.”
- Patricia Dang Hostess, The Slanted Door



Comments from Examiner Readers
5:30 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "Sinking pier drowning businesses"
Report as inappropriate
12:32 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008
re: "Sinking pier drowning businesses"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
The Bay Conservation & Development Commission (BCDC), which oversees waterfront usage, long ago declared that parking is not an appropriate use for port piers and that this pier cannot be repaired for use as parking. Instead, it must be removed in order to improve bay ecology. Even if the port had money and wanted to repair it, BCDC won't give them permission. Bureaurats rule!
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Kudos to the Examiner for keeping these issues in front of us. As a 20 year city resident, I have seen this city slowly deterioriate and am confident it didn't have to get to this point. It is a result of long term poor management and failure to keep ongoing maintenance in the forefront. It may not be possible, but if the Examiner could run a monthly feature listing all the SF structure issues in need of repair, it would keep visibility and help us all to keep our Manager/Leaders accountable. It would also be nice if you gave your readers a chance to add to the list. I live in this city, I walk in this city, and I see a lot in this city. Can our leaders and public managers say the same? Thank you.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree