Multimedia News

'Twilight' Mania
20 photos
In this image released by Summit Entertainmen...
Thanksgiving recipes
20 photos
Food & Drink Examiners are sharing a cornucop...
Hugh Jackman: Sexiest Man Alive (and a few close seconds)
20 photos
In this Nov. 10, 2008, file photo, actor Hugh...
Blondes vs. Brunettes
20 photos
Beyonce is photographed in New York on Thursd...
Faces of murder
20 photos
This undated photo obtained from a MySpace we...

District mulls stop to detaining youth offenders alongside adults

Jul 17, 2008 12:00 AM (128 days ago) by Bill Myers, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
Brandon Forrest, left, 21, and Michael Harrell, also 21, who work as Youth Advocates at the Alliance of Concerned Men, rest in a park on the corner of 7th Street and N Street, NW after a Life Skills Activity Wednesday in D.C. - Greg Whitesell/Examiner

Brandon Forrest, left, 21, and Michael Harrell, also 21, who work as Youth Advocates at the Alliance of Concerned Men, rest in a park on the corner of 7th Street and N Street, NW after a Life Skills Activity Wednesday in D.C. - Greg Whitesell/Examiner
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The District of Columbia is considering a bill that would keep youthful suspects out of grown-up jails while they await trial.

Legislation introduced by Democratic Councilmen Phil Mendelson and Tommy Wells would allow children charged as adults to petition the city’s courts so that they can stay out of adult jail.

Wells and Mendelson say that nearly half of teenagers charged as adults in crimes are never convicted. But their time in adult jails brutalizes them and serves as a kind of boot camp for future felons, the councilmen claim.

“It’s clear that mixing kids and adults within our justice system is a lose-lose proposition,” Mendelson told The Examiner.

This story continues below
Advertisement

The bill has broad support from youth advocates like Liz Ryan of the Campaign for Youth Justice.

“We asked for these changes,” she said. “The bill comports with the research that shows youth prosecuted as adults are more likely to re-offend.”

Support for the measure is not unanimous. Last year, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor balked at a D.C. proposal that would have ended automatic transfers of juveniles to adult courts when they’re charged with some violent crimes.

The legislation may also require an act of Congress because it affects federal law, one law enforcement source told The Examiner.

Victims rights groups also worry that D.C. officials have misplaced priorities.

“Authorities should make victims’ safety and rights a priority,” said Mary Lou Leary, a former federal prosecutor and current executive director of the D.C.-based National Center for Victims of Crime. “Police and prosecutors should provide victims with a reliable and consistent point of contact and do everything possible to protect the victim — who may also be a witness — from harm.”

The bill has enthusiastic support from Brandon Forrest, 21, of the Mount Vernon Square neighborhood. When he was 16, Forrest was a stickup man. Arrested, he was thrown into the D.C. Jail for 10 months.

“Within my first week over there, I got jumped,” he said. “It was worse for other kids. People were getting [urine] thrown on them.”

He was thrown into isolation, an empty room that smelled of feces and vomit.

“It was terrible,” Forrest said. “One inmate was acting disorderly and they Maced all 10 of us. We were all choking.”

Unlike many of his jail mates, Forrest said he went straight after his ordeal. He now works with troubled kids at a D.C. nonprofit group.

“I give them a choice,” he said. “I let them know what’s ahead on the road they’re on and what happens in jail.”

bmyers@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

7:08 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 13, 2008 re: "Fixing Fenty’s jobs program racks up overtime for team"

Examiner Reader said:
Mayor Fenty also needs to look at the D.C. Fire Departments Fire Investigfations Unit. Just yesterday, we lost another arson case in court because one of our investigators lied in court

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:16 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 11, 2008 re: "Fixing Fenty’s jobs program racks up overtime for team"

Overpaid Teen said:
What will happen to the teens that have been overpaid? I have received more than $600 more than I am due, and because I didn't realize that I had been overpaid until a week after it happened, I have spent $19 more than I should have. Will the government try collect the extra funds? Will charges be brought against me because of the $19, even though it was due to a DC government error?

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:41 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 11, 2008 re: "Fixing Fenty’s jobs program racks up overtime for team"

Examiner Reader said:
Is there ever any end to the Districts incompetence?

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:55 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 11, 2008 re: "Fixing Fenty’s jobs program racks up overtime for team"

Examiner Reader said:
When will the Mayor be held accountable? THis is just one example of how reckless he is. He will undoubtedly find a way to blame someone else and illegally fire them; but in the end, it's his responsibility. In this case, it's obvious that it was his own recklessness that led to this debacle. As a voter and taxpayer, I am completely outraged. If the Council isn't more active in it's oversight of this Mayor, they's better start looking for new jobs because as taxpayers we are not going to tolerate this anymore.

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:18 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 11, 2008 re: "Fixing Fenty’s jobs program racks up overtime for team"

Examiner Reader said:
For this mayor: I say recall, recall, recall! You make a mess of the summer jobs program just so you can say you 've done better than Marion Barry. That's not even bad politics. It's childish. the program was supposed to be about the children.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:04 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008 re: "Council-Fenty tussle puts timeline for forensics lab at risk"

The Answer said:
Also what happened to stop and frisk it appears that this is no longer a part of the regular duties of MPD they just respond from crime scene to crime scene, for example I saw 20- 30 supicious subject standing on a corner an as opposed to getting out and asking what these guys were doing and telling them to disburse MPD just rode past, also Ray Charles can see the police coming from a block away with the strobe lights blinking and begin to run and hide, why is this still being done this is not effective policing

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:47 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008 re: "Council-Fenty tussle puts timeline for forensics lab at risk"

The Answer said:
The MPD is in complete dissary the police are stating that the answer is more police officers with high powered guns but the streets are supposed to be safe Mayor Fenty and Mr. Peter Nickles did not think that the city was dangerous enough for us ordinary citizens to own guns as part of our constitutional right the DC police can protect themselves (by getting high powered rifles but ordinary citizens can't. Also some of the shootings in the past two weeks such as the one on North Captiol St and the shooting on Lincoln Road the police were in the area and knew the area was "volatile" but could not stop the shootings and blame it on the citizens stating "citizens don't cooperate with police" and who would considering some of the officers are have ties with felons. It is proven that they release confidential information and are also rude and verbally abusive. Also what happened to the old fashioned traffic stops of moving vehicles considering most shooting happen from moving vehicles

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:42 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Councilman stalls streetcar plans in Anacostia"

will streetcars help or harm? said:
Don't we need to know about the streets the streetcars will be in? Streetcars work in places like Portland, OR, when they have a dedicated area in the middle of a street so that they don't block traffic. But if they have to use the street, they will likely increase congestion, not reduce it. This should be the start of the questioning -- not just ridership, but what happens to traffic speeds. If Graham discovers that there are issues with this streetcar, he should look at the other streetcar plans as well.

5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:31 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Big name donors support GOP D.C. Council candidate"

What said:
Where is Carol doing her job from Rohoboth? She is not only losing Republican support, she is also losing all support.

10 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:43 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Council weighs taxing free employee parking"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh, well. Nobody will come to DC anymore. Especially since Graham parks his own car for free. "Do as I say, not as I do."

9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:11 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "Council to carve up big pot of money"

Homnoir: said:
Oh well, The Cary Silveman campaign may be seeing it's due demise. Silverman & all 10 of his constituents -Ray(We're-Here-We're....) Milefsky, Martin Moulton, Richard (Act-Up) Rogers, Si (I-demand-Shotspotter-now)Kailian, Alex (Bring-me-a-memo) Padro, Kevin (Uncle-Ruckus)Chappelle, Brian (I-demand-an-answer-this-minute-Councilman) Smith and their partners & significant others can take the message that the Shaw/Mt. Vernon/Convention Center/Chinatown community do not find their message(s) are the most viable for the aformentioned communities, as a whole. It's call inclusiveness not colonization by way of gay economic elitism.

7 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:36 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008 re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"

Examiner Reader said:
In any large business, there are incompetent workers. However, there are still many competent workers in D.C. government & a "brain drain" is possible! Most of the problems & perception of bad service are due to ill-prepared managers; managers that should never have been placed in such positions & certainly not allowed to continue as managers. D.C., unfortunately, has an ineffective, inefficient, inadequate method of selecting, training, maintaining & validating its office/program managers. In most instances, required supervisory (MSS)training is a joke and focuses mostly on fluff. A crew is only as good as its captain. If the captain is ethically challenged, unable or unwilling to perform, unfair, and/or a bully to subordinates-the public should expect poor performance and/or service. Yet, even under such challenges, many D.C. workers try to do their work. Their cries for help are routinely ignored & they have become easy whipping posts for what ails DC. Request my name be anonymous.

13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:55 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008 re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"

Examiner Reader said:
Could you do a follow-up to determine how, and when, employees will be notified as to whether they have been guaranteed to receive the incentive payment. Employees would like to put in their official papers if they knew they would definitely receive the incentive. For instance, does it matter when one actually leaves the rolls? How much notice will employees receive that they have been found eligible? The applicaiton to retire, open through Friday, March 7, 2008, is an intent to retire and allows an employee to withdraw their intent. As a matter of fact, could you see whether or not the city is going to have a special fund during FY 2009 to pay these incentives? If Gandhi is saying there is a fiscal problem looming, how does that fit in? Also, will employees receive a lump sum incentive payment or payouts throughout 2009? Will those identified for the incentive payment be based on actual quality of services provided based on the last evaluation? Request my name be anonymous.

9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:44 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008 re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"

Examiner Reader said:
Councilwoman Carol Schwartz is in error. There would be no "brain drain" from the ranks of the D.C. Government because of the fact that the majority of the D.C. employees have little or no brains to begin with. Frankly, if they want to do the taxpayers a favor what they should do is fire what they have and recruit from the outside. Then their problems would be solved.

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:19 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 15, 2007 re: "Council to carve up big pot of money"

What about the taxpayers? said:
Those of use who pay through the nose in property taxes should get a little relief. How about a partial refund?

113 agree | 111 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement