California News

HOT lanes foes cite dangers to migratory birds

Jul 17, 2008 12:00 AM (52 days ago) by Sarah Raymond, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Local environmentalists are trying to halt construction of the Beltway high-occupancy toll lanes because they will harm flocks of migratory birds that are nesting near the site.

The Virginia chapter of the Sierra Club, a naturalist at the Audubon Society and local residents sent a letter Tuesday to Virginia Secretary of Transportation Pierce Homer, asking him to delay construction because flocks of barn swallows and blue-gray gnat-catchers are nesting in nearby trees.

If construction crews disturb the birds’ foraging sites, the environmentalists say, the adult birds might abandon the nests and their fledglings will starve to death.

“The only way we can prove that they’ve violated the rules is by picking up birds and freezing them,” although the Fairfax site is being bulldozed and cleared of most refuse, said Amy Gould, an Annandale resident who was at the site Wednesday.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“They cover their tracks well,” she said. “We’re sort of at a losing battle, but that doesn’t mean we’re going to give up.”

Diana Weaver, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said the Virginia Department of Transportation appears to be acting within the law. “It’s our understanding that the construction is at least 500 feet away from the nests, and we think that’s plenty of space,” she said.

The environmentalists’ letter cited a survey by Elaine Franklin of the Audubon Society, agreed to by Audubon, the HOT lanes’ contractor and VDOT, that listed the protected bird species that would be affected by the construction.

The letter said VDOT was likely in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, an international treaty that forbids killing or harassing protected species, such as the barn swallow and the blue-gray gnat-catcher.

After talks with VDOT and the Fish and Wildlife Service, Franklin agreed that the construction is legal, because the tree clearing will occur only in the birds’ foraging space, not the actual trees where they nest.

“We’ll probably be lobbying for a change in the treaty” to protect foraging sites, Franklin said.

In the meantime, Sierra Club lawyers are continuing to examine the case to figure out whether VDOT is within the law.

Clearing will continue around the Beltway, and HOT lane construction is scheduled to begin next week.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

7:13 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 17, 2008 re: "HOT lanes foes cite dangers to migratory birds"

Examiner Reader said:
(sarcasm) It's great that they are willing to only destroy the trees in the birds’ foraging space, and not the actual trees where they nest. I mean sure, now they'll have a place to sleep, they just won't have anything to eat. Absolutely lovely.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:12 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Bill halting HOT lanes faces slim odds"

Examiner Reader said:
Discrimination. Is VA really adding public roadways that only the rich could afford? Why are the rich the only ones entitled to a fast commute? Am I paying to build these lanes? If so I will be paying for a road that I can't even afford to ride on. Is that really public? Since when is it ok to segregate the population? Rich people over here! Talk about separate and unequal. This state disgusts me.

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:28 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Aging bridges, ramps to be replaced as HOT lanes added"

Examiner Reader said:
And what happens when the "bill" for these lanes is paid off? I guess they'll continue to charge us like they do for the Dulles Toll Road. If the funds go to something productive (i.e. upkeep/upgrade of existings roads) that's fine...I just hope that's the case. I wish they had added the purple line back in the day when Metrorail was still being constructed. It would have been a lot cheaper then...

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Bill halting HOT lanes faces slim odds"

Examiner Reader said:
How about using that lane to make a metro line instead?

72 agree | 61 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement