California News

Multimedia News

Female sluggers on the court and stump
20 photos
Russia's Vera Dushevina returns a shot to Ser...
LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...
PETA gets naked and bloody again
16 photos
Partially clothed protesters seen with taped ...
Cute dogs, bulls and a green polar bear
15 photos
Dogs wait in line to be blessed during a bles...
High School Musical 3 Debate: Tisdale vs. Hudgens
20 photos
U.S. actress Ashley Tisdale arrives for the B...

When being left-handed is more than all right

Jul 17, 2008 12:00 AM (86 days ago) by Frank Deford, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
One reason why Phil Mickelson may not win this weekend’s British Open is because he’s left-handed, writes Examiner columnist Frank Deford. Mickelson is one of just three lefties to have ever won a major tournament. - AP

One reason why Phil Mickelson may not win this weekend’s British Open is because he’s left-handed, writes Examiner columnist Frank Deford. Mickelson is one of just three lefties to have ever won a major tournament. - AP

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - If you’re interested in having your son support you in your old age, here is my vocational advice to you: starting when he’s in the crib, turn him into a left-hander, and then train him to become a relief pitcher. There’s always a well-paying place for southpaw relievers, well up into their athletic dotage.

You see, while lefties moan that the world at large discriminates against them — even though in modern times we usually find ourselves ruled by them like when southpaw Presidents Truman, Ford, Reagan, Bush and the elder  Clinton were in office — our sinister brethren have all the advantages in sports whenever they directly face right-handers. Now an engineering professor named David Peters has come up with some basic statistics, which show what we righties always knew anyway, that baseball in particular is a gauche paradise. And that ain’t no left-handed compliment.

Whereas only about 10 percent of the whole human population is lefty, Professor Peters revealed that about 25 percent of major leaguers are the minority-handed sort of people. More significant, in the Hall of Fame, of the seventy pitchers, fifteen were southpaw — more than twice the Homo sapiens average. And hitters: of the 138 in Cooperstown, 59 were lefty, and eight more half-lefty switch hitters. That means that an incredible 46 percent of the best hitters ever swung at those appetizing right-handed slants.

In basketball, left-handed shooters have always driven opponents crazy. The game’s greatest defensive player, Bill Russell, was a southpaw, which meant that his strong arm matched perfectly for blocking right-handers’ shots. In tennis, the ball spins differently off a left-hander’s racket. Hello, Rafael Nadal. Roger Federer’s shots that go to a fellow right-hander’s weakness, bounce right into Nadal’s wheelhouse. Just as a statistically unusual number of baseball’s greatest hitters — Cobb, Ruth, Williams, Gwynn, Bonds — were left-handed, so does Nadal come from distinguished lefty lineage — Laver, McEnroe, Connors, Navratilova.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Somebody once wrote that McEnroe would be just another losing quarterfinalist if he were right-handed. McEnroe went berserk. Of course, if there’d been a fight, he surely would have battered the writer. Left-handed boxers are a scourge other fighters try to avoid. In fact, there’s a theory postulated by two French sociologists at the University of Montpellier that lefties succeed so in sport because back when men faced off in man-to-man combat, lefties prevailed more often, living to pass those victorious genes on.

The best proof that lefties have an advantage in man-to-man competition, comes, conversely, from golf, where you’re not playing your opponent, only that neutral little ball. In the whole history of the PGA, left-handers have won just three major tournaments, the last being Phil Mickelson’s Masters title in 2004. Mickelson might have won even more if he didn’t make so many ditzy decisions. But then, of course, as us in the smug right-handed majority are so sure of in defeat, left-handers might have the advantage in sport, but God evened that out by making them goofier.

Frank Deford can be reached at flamegarden@aol.com.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

10:21 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 24, 2008 re: "Presidential game plan: Obama’s bid rooted to the rise of the black athlete"

Examiner Reader said:
Dude, come into the 21st century and leave your old white guy racist beliefs behind. Are you friggin' serious? Nah, you gotta be kidding. Some old fart like you? Geez!

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

4:20 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Hope springs eternal for Baltimore’s Phelps"

Examiner Reader said:
your chauvanistic gilman background shows. what about hoff she is from baltimore too. you seem to dismiss the williams as unamerican---perhaps because they are women also

4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:46 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008 re: "TKO: Technology Knockout"

Examiner Reader said:
This is quite possibly the stupidest article I've read in a while. Frank, was press time five minutes away when you coined this piece?

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:48 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 15, 2008 re: "Maybe it’s time to extinguish the Olympic torch"

Examiner Reader said:
Great article; agree with it entirely. The Olympics have lost their prestige, and this year in Beijing, the IOC will recognize this reality when it sees the declining interest from worldwide audiences. And indeed, let's ask the athletes to skip the opening ceremonies and demand that President Bush boycott the games altogether; it's his job to speak diplomatically with action.

9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:39 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 31, 2008 re: "Super Bowl, Shakespeare style"

Brian O'Rourke said:
Alas, poor Billick...we knew him well!

130 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:07 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 14, 2008 re: "A variety of thoughts on the Mitchell Report now that the dust has begun to settle"

Examiner Reader said:
this so called legal system will destroy a thousand white men to destroy one black man. if they want him bad enough. and they do. racism is more clandestine and senister in this country than anywhere else in the world. we black men are considered a threat and always have been. but the table is taking a slow turn. but don't worry we'll show you some love. obviously something you know nothing about.

151 agree | 168 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:08 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 27, 2007 re: "Need an Owner’s Manual? Here’s one"

avid reader said:
Angelos would not listen to anyone who made sense about making baseball interesting again in Baltimore.

191 agree | 168 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:01 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 5, 2007 re: "Time to take the ‘foot’ out of football"

Michael said:
Football was named after the length of the ball, one foot. It has nothing to do with using your feet. And no one cares about soccer anyway. You could change its name to kickball. Oh, and basketball will be bounceball. And change tennis to racketball, racketball to wallball, and golf to metalstickball. Hey, volleyball. Theres one you can keep. Some people will search high and low to find something to complain about. Isn't there real sports news in D.C. that you can write about.

313 agree | 295 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:41 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 10, 2007 re: "Time to take the ‘foot’ out of football"

Ron Redmerski said:
No way was this supposed to happen. Not like this, anyway. Four years ago when the ACC decided to expand, the prevailing thought on Tobacco Road was that the SEC had some competition. Finally. A 12 team super conference that included two Florida schools and, arguably, New England’s top athletic program. The talent-rich, fertile Newport Beach/Hampton recruiting areas were going to help the ACC yield top five football programs like Pez dispensers spit out candy. Well, if yesterday was any indication of how far the ACC has come, we won’t be eating Elvis Pez any time soon. Losing to an underrated East Carolina team is one thing (not to mention struggling with UAB, a program beaten by Michigan State 55-12 the week prior), but getting run over, completely throttled, by LSU and Oklahoma is quite another. The aforementioned powers made quick and decisive work of Virginia Tech and Miami (and that’s saying it nicely), respectively, the two programs that had John Swofford and the ACC bras

317 agree | 337 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:05 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007 re: "Tall tales: Best athletes seem to rise"

Examiner Reader said:
Frank Deford's editorial on tall tales: Best athletes seem to rise Growth hormones does wonders ask my 16 year old son who is on them for medical reasons due to cancer treatment as a baby! If an adult or even a child is using them and they shouldn't be who knows what problems they may have down the road.

384 agree | 347 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:45 AM MST on Tue., May. 15, 2007 re: "Taking a trip up memory lane"

Examiner Reader said:
Reminds me of the old line about horseracing as the sport of kings. But you never saw any kings @the $2 window.

1,099 agree | 851 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement