Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

County catches red-light camera fever

Jul 15, 2008 3:00 AM (91 days ago) by Mike Rosenberg, The Examiner
This story ranks # 1,840 of 5,617
Related Topics: San Mateo County
San Carlos will be the sixth city in San Mateo County to install red-light cameras similar to those at Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road in Millbrae. Other cities such as South San Francisco and Menlo Park are waiting to add the devices as well.
(Juan Carlos Pometta Betancourt/Special to The Examiner)
San Carlos will be the sixth city in San Mateo County to install red-light cameras similar to those at Millbrae Avenue and Rollins Road in Millbrae. Other cities such as South San Francisco and Menlo Park are waiting to add the devices as well.
San Mateo County (Map, News) - San Carlos will become the sixth city on the Peninsula to install a red-light camera at a major intersection as three other cities in San Mateo County eye the popular devices.

Cities are lining up to purchase the cameras, which photograph red-light runners, to reduce accidents at thoroughfares and generate cash for traffic-safety programs.

Since San Mateo became the first city in the county to install the cameras in 2004, Redwood City, Daly City, Menlo Park and Millbrae have installed the devices at major intersections.

Redwood City and Menlo Park added cameras in the last few months, and San Carlos is planning on installing them in the coming months.

This story continues below
Advertisement

South San Francisco and Burlingame are awaiting Caltrans permits for the devices, and Belmont is also considering adding them.

“It does tend to be the case that traffic is always one of the top five complaints from residents [in San Mateo County],” San Carlos Assistant City Manager Brian Moura said.

Police departments in those cities say the cameras are put in place to prevent accidents.

“Just knowing there’s red-light cameras slows people down,” said Burlingame police Capt. Mike Matteucci.

As a bonus, cities also earn money from the citations issued — $358.50 in Millbrae, for instance.

Revenue generated by the cameras often funds other traffic-related needs within cities. In Redwood City, where cameras were installed last month, officials are forecasting the city will earn $187,000 from camera tickets, which will pad the city’s $368,900 traffic-safety fund, Finance Director Brian Ponty said. The cameras cost just $36,000 to install, he said.

That money is spent on traffic-safety programs such as traffic controllers, streetlights, street signs and repainting street markings, Ponty said.

Still, the process of installing the cameras has been far from smooth. Burlingame and South San Francisco have been stalled in their applications for Caltrans permits for more than a year, as has Millbrae in its attempt to add two more cameras.

The cameras are not guaranteed to improve safety. Near the Hillsborough-Burlingame border, police planned on installing a red-light camera at the El Camino Real-Floribunda Avenue intersection. But nearly all of the 160 accidents during the last decade there occurred on left-hand right-of-way violations, which the cameras would not help with, said Hillsborough police Capt. Mark O’Connor.

mrosenberg@sfexaminer.com

By the numbers

5 Cities in San Mateo County that have red-light cameras installed

3 Cities in San Mateo County that plan on adding cameras this year

$358.50 Cost of a red-light camera violation in Millbrae

2004 The year San Mateo installed the county’s first red-light camera

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:16 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess SF really doesn't want people to come to the City! What a load of crock. Nobody in the SF govt has any business sense. Great, kill the goose that lays the golden eggs (businesses and sales taxes).

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:59 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"

just shoot me said:
sweet - another friggin toll. I already pay $1000/month in commute costs.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:41 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "City ‘gateway toll’ considered"

Examiner Reader said:
If there were a viable, reliable CLEAN option then people would be able to not drive. Without that option people must drive. Clean up MUNI, make it dependable and regular and co- ordinate with other transit agencies and people will want to get out of their cars. As it is if you are in a hurry or out of communte hours MUNI is not an option. Also, I am unclear why people love BART!. Signage is pathetic and it is NOT co-ordinated with MUNI or Golden Gate transit, what's the point? Take a look at NYC, London or Paris to get a look at what good transit systems are. Funny, their workers show up and they keep to a timetable. Maybe we could try doing that?

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:43 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008 re: "A way around crash sites"

Bruce Simmons said:
for one, I don't understand how it cost $30 million to instigate the deployment of traffic control officers and traffic cones. Second, how would diverting a traffic jam to El Camino Real alleviate anything. El Camino Real is already questionably jammed up at traffic time and the ensuing flood of motor vehicles would only spill the excess onto the various side streets around that road. Spend the $30 million where it's needed, on the school systems or homeless shelters.

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:21 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008 re: "Three die in crash-filled weekend"

Examiner Reader said:
R.I.P. DeKeisha Skaggs! We will all miss you! -Jessica G. P.

8 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:00 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "I-95 north of Baltimore home to region’s worst bottlenecks"

Examiner Reader said:
600 Million dollars? Much too expensive and way too late to fix the problem. By the time the road is built, no one will care because the people will be gone.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:31 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "I-95 north of Baltimore home to region’s worst bottlenecks"

Examiner Reader said:
These choke points have been around for over 30 years - and the drivers that dart into the lane and slam on their brakes that have not killed themselves are still endangering the rest of us! Leave the Baltimore area for good - I did 12 years ago and life is so much better since I don't have to deal with the crime or the local corporate societal ladder. I love to hear the companies complain about the lack of talent in the region. The problem is everybody in the Baltimore business district is trying to rape each other so what is left is table scraps for the locals - they don't have a problem hiring out of staters and paying them big bucks but if you are a local they hate the fact that they are reliant on you - especially if you are white and have a moral value system.

6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:49 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Crash won't accelerate bridge-median plan"

ms jackson said:
All this money spent on highway dividers, anti smoking campaigns, youth violence intiatives, dietary labeling, unwanted pregnancies, anti suicide barriers, etc. could be saved by introducing a microscopic brain implant that would cause extreme pain and forced change of action any time somebody begins to behave in a way that creates any sort of societal problems. Of course, this would mean about 95 percent of huimanity would be constantly groaning in pain and apparently changing their minds!

10 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:03 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008 re: "Bad weather causes traffic delays around District"

Examiner Reader said:
oh my gosh that is bad people need to start being more careful

152 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:16 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Golden Gate Bridge tragedy could have been worse"

Examiner Reader said:
When someone does something like this, it not only saves lives, it leaves the rest of us with the knowledge that one of us did a great good thing. I'm so grateful for that knowledge. John Beatty is a really good man.

202 agree | 208 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:44 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Golden Gate Bridge tragedy could have been worse"

San Francisco Voter said:
Wow. I knew there were at least a few good people around here.

212 agree | 201 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:16 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 17, 2007 re: "Study: Traffic costs D.C. $2B, Baltimore $1 billion annually"

Mike Licht said:
>>Re: Study: Traffic costs D.C. $2B, Baltimore $1 billion annually<< Editorial decision to omit hyperlink to the actual study is a gross disservice to readers.

236 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:09 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007 re: "Triathlon will snarl Sunday traffic"

William Cooke said:
Great race. Thanks Annapolis, Annapolis Police, and AA County Police.

296 agree | 244 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement