You are here: Los Angeles Commentary

Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

Commentary - Smokey Bear failing national parks in downtown Washington

Jul 13, 2008 5:24 AM (93 days ago) by Harry Jaffe, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Let’s say you are a tourist from Paris or London visiting Washington, D.C., for the first time. Perhaps you simply drove in from Bethesda or Herndon to have lunch in the nation’s capital and take in a matinee at the Shakespeare Theatre.

You find yourself at the corner of 14th and K streets, you see an expansive city park, and you walk in for a respite from the midday heat. Here’s what you would see at Franklin Square:

Cracked sidewalks going back to gravel; a busted water fountain with the top broken off and the bowl dangling six inches from the ground; and trash and newspapers littering the patchy grass. You venture past park benches in disrepair toward the fountain in the park’s center. It’s not working; a few mallards navigate the empty cups and floating wrappers in the soapy water. The rats come out at dusk.

“It’s very Third World,” says Emily Durso, president of the Hotel Association of Washington. “I don’t like walking through Franklin Square. It’s depressing.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

At the risk of depressing readers in my inaugural Sunday column, I can’t help but expose the decrepit condition of our downtown parks. I discussed the matter with Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, who’s been working to get the U.S. Park Service to keep up its parks in the city.

“It’s an embarrassment,” she tells me. “Sounds as if this has crossed the line to indecency. People think it’s a city park. It’s under federal control.”

It might surprise you to know that urban spaces such as Dupont Circle, Rock Creek Park and Ford’s Theater Park as well as suburban destinations like Suitland Park, Wolf Trap and Glen Echo Park are under Park Service domain. The feds control 8,500 acres in D.C. and 80,000 acres in Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia.

To their credit, the park rangers, park police and maintenance staff do a swell job of maintaining their parks and monuments, given the $150 million annual budget for the National Capital Region. You have to give them special credit for the programs at Carter Baron on 16th Street.

But the Park Service does not get a pass for the dreadful condition of our city parks, including the National Mall. I ask Norton whether she’s pleased with the maintenance of the Mall.

“Of course not,” she says. “The whole place is a wreck.”

She’s starting to get calls about the rats that have taken over Dupont Circle.

When I raise the matter with local Park Service spokesman Bill Line, he says, “For every person who levels criticism, we can find an equal number who say the parks look nice.” The rats, he says, are a “human problem,” because people leave trash around. What about Franklin Square’s disrepair?

“It’s reasonable to expect it’s not always going to look pristine, green and tidy,” he says. “We’re in an urban center.”

True, but Paris has an urban center. Ditto London, Moscow and Madrid. A Parisian venturing into Franklin Square might think he’s stumbled into the center of Baghdad.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

5:24 PM MST on Sun., Aug. 10, 2008 re: "Do Republicans have the guts to win the energy fight?"

Examiner Reader said:
You? Pretty ignorant I would say. This article is so dead on, that it's hard to believe Americans have not figured this out on their own. Sure, we should develop solar and wind power, BUT we should also develop oil, gas and nuclear energy at the same time. We should immediately start to drill for new oil & gas reserves and start immediate construction of nuclear power plants as well as new refineries. You dumb-ass Democrats just don't get it!! Go live in the 3rd World if you don't like the continued industrialization of this nation. Try living where they don't have running water, electricity and person transportation. You clowns are driving this economy into the ground with all the BS environmental regulations. The tide has turned and Americans are waking up to the cold, hard reality - we need to stop trying to "save the world" and focus on saving our country!!!

10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:28 PM MST on Sun., Aug. 10, 2008 re: "Do Republicans have the guts to win the energy fight?"

Examiner Reader said:
Who is this guy? He has succinctly hit it right on the head. Socialists do not understand how capitalism works. Whatever they were taught in school has nothing whatsoever to do with what will bring the price of gas down. This is the one question that is never driven home to Democrat politicians. They love higher oil prices because it is an automatic tax increase they didn't have to vote on.

12 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:34 AM MST on Sun., Aug. 10, 2008 re: "Do Republicans have the guts to win the energy fight?"

Examiner Reader said:
This article is a prime example of how the API (American Petroleum Institute) has successfully brainwashed the public into believing that offshore drilling will help our energy crisis, rather than tapping the abundant wind and solar energy resources that we have in this country. What a shame! One week after the API bombarded the public with their misleading ad campaign, McCain and Bush came out in favor of lifting the ban on offshore drilling! Whew, crisis solved now! No need to REALLY solve our energy crisis by developing the wind and solar to compete with oil and gas!! How ignorant can we be?

8 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:47 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 9, 2008 re: "Do Republicans have the guts to win the energy fight?"

Gary Gross said:
What a false premise. The question isn't whether we prevail on the CR. The question is whether we'll keep talking about this issue. Shutting down the government is risky business. It isn't risky business to hold this issue over the Democrats' heads through Election Day.

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:30 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 8, 2008 re: "The trial bar goes on the offensive"

Ivan Fail said:
As a 2 time defendant in malicious, frivolous law suits, 1 by mob enforcer contract killer and loan shark Harold "Kayo" Konigsberg)I can speak from experience about what society is letting the lawyers get away with. The lawyers are getting away with it because of the divisive, turf protecting "clique system" mentality of Big Business which portrays Itself as the sole and exclusive victim of the frivolous lawsuit industry. That exclusionary arrogance coupled with the fact that Big Business itself all too ofen plays "fast and loose with ethics" via a "rip off, run around and rotten service" attitude toward the "jury pool electorate" erodes a lot of public support for effecive legal reform. That is because for the reasons cited many Americans consider the stand off between Big Business and the Trial Lawyers as just another case of "The Pot Calling The Kettle Black". And all 50 state "fox guarding the chicken house" Attorney "Disicpline" Bureaucracies have to be reformed FIRST!

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:08 PM MST on Sun., Aug. 3, 2008 re: "Worst Ideas of the Week"

Concerned Taxpayer said:
It's strange how Bush seems to believe that SPECULATIVE coastal drilling is an answer to the gas prices - which could produce 2 barrels of oil in, say, 20 yrs from now. The questions I would be asking, instead, would be: 1) how come oil/gas prices soared during the Bush admin? 2) how come BIG OIL still received taxpayer subsidies despite CONSECUTIVE RECORD PROFITS? 3) how come I'm left eating PB&J for lunch, when I used to have much more of a choice several years back because I could afford more?? Mr. President, how come?

9 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:19 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 30, 2008 re: "Smokey Bear failing national parks in downtown Washington"

Examiner Reader said:
"It's very third world"????? In what context and in what situation is a statement like this acceptable???

12 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:19 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008 re: "Whistleblowers as mercenaries"

Examiner Reader said:
I find it interesting how Peter Hutt is so concerned about non-profits and "mom and pop" businesses when he's probably never represented anyone less than a millionaire in his entire life.

9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:51 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008 re: "Whistleblowers as mercenaries"

Examiner Reader said:
Imagine .....??? This is the best argument you have? You mean there are NO REAL EXAMPLES OF THIS EVER HAPPENING? OK, let's imagine. Let's imagine space aliens coming down from Mars. Let's imagine the ocean was full of grape Koolaid. In the world of NOT IMAGINATION, the False Claims Act has returned over $20 billion stolen by liars, cheaters and thieves working for the kind of corporations that Mr. Hutt defends. Funny that is not mentioned.

11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:47 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 27, 2008 re: "Whistleblowers as mercenaries"

George H. Parker, Esq., Colorado attorney said:
The Bill does not threaten anyone unless they "knowingly" commit fraud on the United States government. The amendments do not punish "accidental mistakes" as alleged by the mega-defense firm attorney. The reason for the new Bill is that federal courts are confused about many of its issues, and an Arkansas federal court has specifically asked for clarification from Congress of what it intended the law to mean. Can a government employee qualify as a "whistleblower"? Some courts say yes, others no. The Bill says "yes, and puts an end to the confusion. Is the statute of limitations 6 years or 10? Courts are split on this too. The Bill says 10 years. One of the main wrongs the Bill does is removes the "public disclosure bar" as a tool for corporations committing fraud to escape justice, a tool abused by defense lawyers. By the way, the Bill has bipartisan support from senior Democrats and Republicans. The only ones against this bill are large corporations and their attorneys.

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement