Multimedia News

Hot celebs at the People's Choice Awards
6 photos
Jewel arrives at the 35th Annual People's Cho...
Women sports gallery
6 photos
France's Alize Cornet reacts after taking a p...
Notables who have lost children
6 photos
John Travolta's 16-year-old son Jett died Jan...
New Year, New You
6 photos
Oprah regrets her weight gain over the past y...
Hopman Cup highlights
6 photos
Russia's Dinara Safina returns a shot against...

Forget losing your luggage - laptops take flight at Baltimore-area airports

Jul 3, 2008 7:41 AM (189 days ago) by Andrew Cannarsa, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
Think twice before bringing your laptop on your next plane trip. A new study says more than 10,000 laptops are lost each week at the nation’s 36 largest airports. – Getty Images

Think twice before bringing your laptop on your next plane trip. A new study says more than 10,000 laptops are lost each week at the nation’s 36 largest airports. – Getty Images
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - It’s a common scenario — the business traveler feels rushed, carries too many items and worries about missing a flight.

Often lost in the commotion is their laptop.

Business travelers lose about 10,300 laptops per week at the nation’s 36 largest airports, according to a study released this week by the Michigan-based Ponemon Institute.

Laptops are lost, misplaced or stolen every day at large airports like Baltimore-Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport, Washington Dulles International Airport and Ronald Reagan National Airport, said Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of the Ponemon Institute.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“The numbers are staggering — you almost want to have some kind of handcuff to your laptop,” Ponemon said.

BWI ranked 21st among the nation’s 36 largest airports with about 125 laptops lost at the airport each week, Ponemon said. Jonathan Dean, BWI spokesman, said the lost-and-found department holds few laptops. The Transportation Security Administration collects laptops lost during security checks, while ones forgotten on airplanes are held by the airline.

“The majority of laptops that are lost in the airport usually are lost at the security checkpoint,” Dean said.

Reagan was tied for eighth with about 450 laptops lost per week, while Dulles was 10th with about 400 lost per week, Ponemon said.

Courtney Prebich, spokeswoman for both airports, said data showed 276 laptops were turned into the lost-and-found at Reagan in 2007, of which 269 were returned to the owner. At Dulles in 2007, 43 were turned in, and 37 returned.

“We make every effort to identify the owner and return the laptop,” Prebich said.

Laptops usually are lost at security checkpoints, departure gates and restrooms, according to the study. The study reviewed 106 major airports in 46 states.

Former Washington D.C. resident Sean Paige lost a laptop after checking his bag in Miami and traveling to the British Virgin Islands a few years ago. When he arrived, the laptop was gone from his bag.

"Airport security makes such a fetish about scanning and frisking every passenger, but we passengers don't know how good security is when we surrender our checked bags and they disappear from view,” said Paige who now works in Colorado. “If someone can so easily remove something from a checked bag, what might someone put into a checked bag. I definitely won’t check it anymore. If I have to, I’ll carry it.”

acannarsa@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

8:25 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "BWI struggles as international magnet"

Examiner Reader said:
The most obvious reason why Maryland cannot attract international business is that the state beurcacrats, most of who come from the hick town Baltimore, refuse to even acknowledge the Nation's Capital which is enaces by Maryland by three sides. The state may have changed the name of the only state-run airport to include Washington, but that's as far as the politicians go. In Maryland, everything is about Baltimore, despite the true economic engine of the state being Montgomery County, which is struggling to compete with Northern Virginia, a region with a huge international business center. Maryland has failed in so many ways. It's a hick state through and through.

8 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:51 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007 re: "Airport meeting disappoints"

Examiner Reader said:
Mr. Rau makes some good points, however his references to noise and property values at the Greensboro airport are not a good comparison to the situation in Carroll County. Greensboro is an international airport with regular commercial passenger flights. That is not and will not be the case here.

183 agree | 203 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:21 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007 re: "Airport meeting disappoints"

Examiner Reader said:
This airport issue is NOT about accepting the FACT that Westminster is growing. It actually has little to do with the growth of Westminster. Did the last expansion "boost" enormous growth for Westminster? Corporations can currently use CCRA without an expansion. Remember - its already a safe airport at its current size - this airport has a good safety record now - let's get other current issues cleaned up before even considering adding more!

209 agree | 187 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:59 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "Airport expansion plan doesn’t fly with some county residents"

Jodi Siu said:
There are also Carroll residents that want to see the expansion. I think it is a great thing! It will be safer for our many pilots in the county and quieter for those close to the airport. Growth is a good think any people should accept the fact that Westminster is growing.

318 agree | 246 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:23 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

George Grubby said:
I have no tolerence for public official or citizens who speak out against abusive spending and taxes untill they stand to be on the receiving end of such funds. Yes, most likly if we do not accept these funds they will go somewhere else, however it is that attitude which fuels the perpetual motion of ever rising taxes. I urge or commisioners to live up to their conservative principals and say no to the temptation of federal money and not to forfiet values for value.

225 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:22 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

lisa said:
I moved to carroll county to get away from the noise. Please leave things the way they are. the citizens of carroll county should speak not the government

199 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:09 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

Examiner Reader said:
I also sent a letter. Why was I not mentioned as one of the nine? Is the opposition being hidden? NO AIRPORT EXPANSION. The citizens are against the Expansion. Commissioners, represent the people.

215 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:11 PM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007 re: "New anti-expansion group demands delay of airport vote"

Examiner Reader said:
I ran across your stories on the internet while looking for help for our town's opposition to the airport expansion. I live around the Crisfield-Somerset Cty Airport in Crisfield, MD. Our county (Somerset) had an Environmental Assessment done by URS (May 2007)- as a result of this study the county wants to take 3 homes/33 acres of trees/8 acres of wetlands. WE ARE IN AN UPROAR over this. We are a very small town with a very small airport. We do not need an increase in the amt of planes, in size of planes & noise. 80% of residents around airport are retired or close to it. We have 700 signatures on our petition, we sent copies to FAA, URS, local, state & federal politicians. As a result of this, a public hearing is planned for us to speak against this expansion. You should be afforded the same opportunity as us. Contact your commissioners. We have just taken the next step closer to winning, but who knows what are real chances are. I wish you all luck. M. Atkins

231 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:09 PM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007 re: "New anti-expansion group demands delay of airport vote"

Examiner Reader said:
Perhaps the Commissioners need a pay raise. 45K would make anyone fight the system. Lets get three new Commissioners and give them a pay raise to lead this County for the people. We voted for these and we need a new batch.

213 agree | 192 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:47 AM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Airport’s runway plan threatens asphalt plant"

Examiner Reader said:
To set the record straight: My family has been near the airport for almost 50 years. We didn't "buy" a house near the airport. We were here before the airport. I have spoken to many others who say they were told by the county there were no plans for expansion. One woman said she even went to the planning department and checked before she bought her house. If the county wants to expand the airport, they should not have allowed (and continue to allow) so many housing developments near the airport. Where is proper "Land Use Planning"? The County's claims that "airport users" will pay for the expansion costs is nonsense. It is the taxpayers who will pay. There is no hard and fast line between the Carroll County Airport Enterprise Fund and county taxpayers' general fund. Watch the numbers. This year the new hangars show up in the "Privately Funded" column. Watch what happens next year. Mysteriously, those numbers will drift back into the "County-funded" column.

470 agree | 220 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:41 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "Qatar Airways, others, offering new flights to Dulles"

Anti-NIMBI said:
Wow, what can I say; if not having airplanes fly over your deck while you sip your martini is important to you, maybe next time don't buy a house near an airport.

437 agree | 244 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:59 PM MST on Wed., May. 23, 2007 re: "FAA taking steps to reduce airplane noise after complaints"

Las Vegas resident said:
Recently the FAA has imposed a new flight path over a large amount of homes in west Las Vegas. They said there would be no compromise or restrictions. I came across this article and it tells me the FAA are hypocrites! Being the fastest growing city for the last 25 years the quality of life has gotten worse with traffic, crime, and now massive jet planes flying over my house from 6 A.M. to 1 A.M. You are lucky to get some kind of compromise with the FAA.

222 agree | 212 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 21, 2007 re: "Anti-expansion group submits petition"

Examiner Reader said:
The citizens of Carroll County truly need to be heard and taken seriously in this issue. This proposed expansion is not in the best interest of the county's loyal citizens. This proposed expansion has no justification to economically sound. This proposed expansion has no benefit for the county's own citizens who strive to make Carroll County a great place to live! Keep Carroll County Beautiful!

238 agree | 216 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:14 AM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "FAA taking steps to reduce airplane noise after complaints"

residents being ignored said:
If i came to your house and did loops around it on my dirt bike you would call the police and i would be in trouble for noise and property damage.what police do we call for your noise and property damage? i cant stand the noise or turbulance in the past 3 years,nothing has been done about it,the cracks in my ceilings and walls are getting bigger,it wakes me up in the middle of the night.we can not open our windows here.not to mention the health and saftey issues..no one has paid for any sound proofing yet.before this plan is even thinkable you should take care of the damage that is already caused to tinicum.BEFORE IT GOES ANY FURTHER.

244 agree | 222 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement