Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
As Caltrain continues to break ridership records — 40,000 people board trains each weekday — one of the groups most affected has been bicyclists, who must board cars equipped with bike racks at the end of the trains. Nearly 10 percent of Caltrain riders are bicyclists, many of whom say they are regularly “bumped” from trains during peak commute hours.
For 18 months, the agency has been preparing a plan to solve the bike-related problems, and it recently released the results of the research, which include policies to improve accessibility and expand bike parking spaces by as much as 50 percent at some stations.
Bicyclists said their biggest concern, however, was having to wait for extra trains when the first one that arrives is full. In September, the only time Caltrain has recorded statistics on the issue, 51 out of 2,400 bikers, or 2.1 percent, were bumped. Ridership has soared since then, however, and many trains are now full for regular riders and bicyclists alike, Caltrain spokeswoman Christine Dunn said.
“We’re not going to be able to continue to add bike cars because not only are the bike cars becoming crowded, but all of the cars are becoming crowded,” Dunn said.
In addition to a lack of funding and a limit on cars per train, Dunn said, the agency can fit about two passengers on its train for every bicyclist who boards. The agency said it hopes the extra parking spaces will encourage bicyclists to leave their bikes at the station, but that is not an option for commuters such as Shirley Johnson, who needs her bike at both ends.
Johnson, who takes Caltrain between San Francisco and Foster City each day, said she gets bumped from a train at least once per week.
“I don’t ever know if I’m going to get on that train at night,” Johnson said. “It’s extremely frustrating.”
Johnson is not alone.
“If I’m not careful, I could get bumped every day of the week,” said San Francisco-to-Burlingame commuter and bicyclist Marc Brandt.
“I miss my first train, usually,” said his cousin and fellow bicyclist, Adrian Brandt.
By the numbers
7%: Weekday riders who bring bikes on board
About 2%: Additional weekday riders who park bikes at station
1,900: Total bike parking spaces at all stations
16 or 32: Spots for bikes on bike cars
10 Busiest stations: That have parking and access concerns
139: Capacity of Bombardier cars without bike racks
123: Capacity of Bombardier cars with bike racks
148: Capacity of gallery cars without bike racks
107: Capacity of gallery cars with bike racks
January 2007: Bike plan started
June 2008: Results of bike plan released
Source: Caltrain



Comments from Examiner Readers
1:39 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 9, 2008 re: "Caltrain covets cyclists’ cash"
Report as inappropriate
8:58 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 8, 2008
re: "Caltrain covets cyclists’ cash"
Report as inappropriate
5:26 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 27, 2008
re: "Rail plan on track to eminent domain"
Report as inappropriate
1:31 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 28, 2008
re: "Caltrain leaving bicyclists out in the cold"
Report as inappropriate
11:43 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Teen’s death on tracks makes five this year"
Report as inappropriate
11:59 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "Teen’s death on tracks makes five this year"
Report as inappropriate
11:21 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Pedestrian fatality on Caltrain tracks delays train service"
Report as inappropriate
11:19 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Pedestrian fatality on Caltrain tracks delays train service"
Report as inappropriate
10:13 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008
re: "Teen’s death on tracks makes five this year"
Report as inappropriate
12:32 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008
re: "Teen’s death on tracks makes five this year"
Report as inappropriate
12:13 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Pedestrian fatality on Caltrain tracks delays train service"
Report as inappropriate
12:08 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Caltrain back on time after fatal accident"
Report as inappropriate
12:48 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008
re: "Pedestrian fatality on Caltrain tracks delays train service"
Report as inappropriate
3:46 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Caltrain back on time after fatal accident"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Two Caltrain incidents tie up commute for riders"
Report as inappropriate
9:01 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 17, 2008
re: "Amtrak strike would derail Caltrain service"
Report as inappropriate
12:01 AM MST on Fri., Dec. 7, 2007
re: "Caltrain to add two evening trains"
Report as inappropriate
5:30 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007
re: "Caltrain to add two evening trains"
Report as inappropriate
7:22 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007
re: "Rift with feds stalls electrification project"
Report as inappropriate
2:17 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 7, 2007
re: "Caltrain back on time after fatal accident"
Report as inappropriate
Professor DeBreeze said:
That guy in the bicycle helmet is super cute.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Caltrain is lying. Bike sharing works for short trips of an hour or less, so the bikes can be reused. Commuters take bikes all day or all night, defeating the purpose. Only one train per day is full for part of the run. Removing empty seats so passengers with bicycles can get on increases farebox revenues. If some riders need to stand for a couple of stops so that other passengers can board at all, it's an ok tradeoff. Caltrain is losing money by not providing for more bikes on trains.
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Here we go again--Eminent Domain--one way of forcing home & store owners, residences & renters alike, out of there homes & businesses without recourse. Where can all these folks & businesses relocate? Many have lived in the areas close to Caltrain tracks for years--young, middle age & seniors. The person/persons that proposed this plan isn't thinking of the thousands & thousands of folks that will be affected by this proposal. High speed train to "rush" to Los Angeles area in 2 hours? Why? Doesn't make sense. I, for one will vote NO if the proposal appears on the November ballot. Fran.
10 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jonquil said:
Thanks for the article. One point to mention: Caltrain is never, as far as I know, bumping passengers at any station. That means that switching a small amount of capacity from passengers to bicycles is not actually harmful to the non-bicyclists. I, and many other bicyclists, would be happy to buy a ticket for my bicycle to compensate Caltrain for the missing passenger revenues. I need my bicycle at both ends of the commute.
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Ashley Williams said:
The second sentence first part is suppose to say" Man i would hang out with him".
7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
some people who commented have no heart. a 15-year-old guy died and people seem to have no symphathy. This kid went to my school and although I agree that he shouldn't have been walking on the tracks, he still died and that changes everything. NOBODY deserves to die. This kid was in my brother's class. I can see how his death has affected the school and I wish his family comfort and all my sympathy.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Eddie, do you have no soul? I wonder if Anthony's mom would think thats funny.
9 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is pretty scary. I am a fifteen year old boy, just like Anthony, and I take Caltrain to and from school everyday. I can't believe how some people can make sick "natural selection" jokes, if it was your family or friend, you would not.
7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Kim ; Anthony's Friend said:
Rest in Paradise, Anthony Rea! We miss you & love you. We were just kickin it the day before,and I didnt know you for that long,but you were easy to click with.And you always have a smile on your face,such a nice guy.Rest in Peace! We love you.
6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
In the Michael Bulnes Jr. case. The court ruled that the designated path on Caltrain land was unsafe and dangerous, but the engineer was not at fault because the train could not stop fast enough. The jury whom I assume watches too much TV, thought real live was like TV's "CSI", but its not. It appears that the higher educated the juror, the less common sense the person. It's obvious that the conductor has limited power in stopping a moving train on a dime, but that does not mean that Caltrain is not at fault. When history has repeatedly told you that the tracks are unsafe evidenced by the continual slaughtering of our families and friends, some type of light should go on in their head. There have been time tested methods of securing the tracks, but Caltrain refuses to spend the money. I'm sure many commuters agree with the cost saving measures Caltrain is taking, at least until they loose a loved one. I understand that the train is not at fault, but management is.
5 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Love how Mike states the train "slammed" in to the person. Great writing. These people are trespassers. It is private property not a short cut. Unfortunately some people tend to end their lives this way and involve not only crews but passengers. Remember, trains don't swerve.
9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Aslong as you stay OFF the tracks you have nothing to worry about. Do you go play on the freeway?
9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This Weinberg person seems to get a personal thrill every time someone gets smashed by one of these so called miracles of transportation, an almost God like statement of... "TRESPASSER BE DAMMED" is proclaimed. I suppose the same comment would be acceptable for auto/pedestrian accidents as well? These so called baby bullet trains are a huge mistake and do not belong in a heavily populated areas.
5 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
eddie said:
For the bleeding heart liberal who accuses train engineers of murdering tresspassers: it's not murder, it's natural selection at work.
71 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"fatally killed"? What other way is there to be killed? Getting killed is always fatal. Try "fatally injured", or just "killed".
50 agree | 62 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Muni killing people and a potential Caltrain shutdown. I love living in this "transit first" city without a car.
100 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Remember the Daylight and the Lark? That was a great way to travel to LA and back. Same track as the Cal Train Commuter, brings back good memories.
129 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How is it 'murder' when it takes the engineer 2 miles to stop the train? Honestly, if you saw some of the s**t that those train engineers see on a daily basis (people hopping on and off the tracks in front of approaching trains, idiots wearing headphones walking on the tracks) you'd actually start praising CalTrain for the LOW amount of deaths that occur each year.
123 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
All East Coast commuter railroads (NJ Transit, SEPTA, MARC, MTA) as well as Amtrak mix MU's with diesel power!
136 agree | 145 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Makes me sick how CalTrain always calls the people they kill "trespassers", as if they are not humans. CalTrain's way of deflecting responsibility for the many murders they commit each year.
244 agree | 234 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree