The Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs will soon start an inspection program that targets all multifamily buildings in a routine cycle, director Linda Argo said during a news conference outside a slum in Southeast. The District’s attorneys, meanwhile, will take property owners to court, and perhaps to jail, over their failure to fix the worst of the worst.
The changes follow years of lethargy on the city’s part fighting slumlords.
“We need to go after these properties in court, and we need to use the strength of the receivership law to make sure work is done on these buildings,” Mayor Adrian Fenty said outside 2907 Gainesville St.
The rotting windows of the 13-unit Gainesville Street building are the first sign that something is obviously very wrong. The conditions get much worse inside.
Apartments are infested with rats, pipes are leaking, floor tiles are missing, and ceilings are crumbling. There’s a gaping hole in the ceiling of James Weaver’s second-floor unit, hundreds of roaches scuttling in his kitten’s water dish and a breach in the floor beneath his kitchen sink, through which one can see the basement.
“This was cheap and I thought I could get them to do things,” Weaver, an eight-month resident, said of the building’s owners.
Tenants complained to no avail, at least until April, when the city sued the owners of 13 properties across the city, threatening receivership if code violations aren’t abated. The first hearings are slated for Aug. 1.
Sharlon Williams, a co-owner of the Gainesville Street property, claimed to be “in the process of getting a loan to fix the place up.” All 13 units are rented, he said, but several tenants “buy their drugs but they don’t pay me a dime.”
City officials threatened incarceration for the city’s worst landlords.
“If the court orders are violated, our ultimate punishment will be to put these people in jail,” said acting Attorney General Peter Nickles.
There are a handful of slumlords, Argo said, “who scoff at the law and take advantage of the enforcement system we set up.”
Under the existing inspection system, the agency’s 74 inspectors check only those buildings that receive complaints. The new program, still in development, demands routine inspections of problem properties and occasional looks at every multifamily building in the city.
mneibauer@dcexaminer.com



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Seriously, wouldn't you love to have a little house in the model of the Shire from Lord of the Rings? How energy efficient?!?! Keep the soil on top of the roof and around most of the walls and you keep about a 60-65 degree temperature year-round. Little need for AC; limited need for heat (especially since the insulation is good). Problems: need a dehumidifier. Also would have a concern for mold as well as the need to mow and water the roof on occassions.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate