Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Other measures were delayed or killed in an increasingly deadlocked special session, convened Monday to find ways to raise money for the commonwealth’s network of roads, rails and bridges.
The audit measure cleared the House Transportation Committee unopposed and then the House Appropriations Committee on a 17-4 vote, signaling a degree of bipartisan support for the independent review of how VDOT spends its money.
The bill’s patron, Del. L. Scott Lingamfelter, R-Woodbridge, expected the audit to cost between $4 to $6 million. He said it would incorporate the state’s numerous prior reviews of the agency, but that it was nevertheless necessary to “bring in an outside set of eyes.”
“There are no self-butchering hogs,” he said.
The Kaine administration has appeared hostile to the concept of another VDOT audit, and on Monday the governor attacked it as a “transparent ploy” by lawmakers seeking to shirk responsibility to raise money for road construction and maintenance.
But Kaine’s transportation secretary, Pierce Homer, did not offer major opposition to the bill Tuesday, saying that “overall, we’re anxious for any kind of oversight and accountability.”
Kaine’s own $1.1 billion tax plan to close the state’s highway maintenance gap and raise new construction money was not considered Tuesday. Competing Senate proposals that include a gas tax favored by the chamber’s Democratic leaders are expected to be taken up today by the Senate Finance Committee. The governor’s plan does not include a levy on fuel.
Republican bills that would have used potential natural gas revenue from coastal drilling, should a federal moratorium be lifted, to fund transportation died early deaths in the Senate Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee. The Democratic-controlled committee shot down the measures 8-5, with opposition based largely on environmental concerns.
A measure that would create a constitutional “lockbox” for transportation money cleared the House and Senate Privileges and Elections committees.
wflook@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
8:50 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Hopes for Va. transportation plan dim"
Report as inappropriate
10:32 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 28, 2008
re: "Kaine touts public-private cooperation on transportation projects"
Report as inappropriate
9:46 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "State Senate sends gas-tax increase to hostile House, which may kill bill"
Report as inappropriate
8:31 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 24, 2008
re: "Flurry of new solutions emerges, throwing tolls into the equation"
Report as inappropriate
8:38 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 23, 2008
re: "Lawmakers return to Richmond for transportation fight"
Report as inappropriate
11:34 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008
re: "Fairfax largely rebuffed in legislature"
Report as inappropriate
Mexicans Without Borders must leave too!!!! said:
The Dems have too many solutions, unfortunately they all involve tax hikes. In a troubled economy, they must be crazy. LOL
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
DemDistrustingKaine said:
Turning public assets--like toll roads--over to private interests sounds a great deal like what a fella' named Mussolini did. I contributed to and voted for a fella' named Kaine--not a Bloomberg or a Mussolini. My Democratic party forebears fought a war against that kind of "privatization" in FDR's times. I will not support Democrats of the Mussolini sort any more than FDR did.
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
all new road taxes need to be paid by drivers,,not poor like me who cant affoard a car or to drive,,put your taxes on all transportation products,,like ,gas,oil,tires,repairs like breaks,you drive it you pay for it,,and if you cant afford a car..park it like me,,but quite takin my food money!!
8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
its a aggravation to have to plunk down 1.25 every time i go through there if there was another way we could capture revenue state wide i rather do that so tax payers could pay my 1.25 for me while i drive on the dullas toll road,hummm i live in danville va why should i pay xtra taxes to cover your 1.25 for driveing on the toll road when i have never in my life drove on it,if u dont like the aggravation of paying the 1.25 for driveing on dullas toll roads then stay away from them if u drive them to a big money job then quit crying about the 1.25 mabe hampton and richmond could use a few toll roads they are stuck in grid lock anyway would be easy to collect tolls tons of cars there if grid locked thats a nice hunk of money do that and put that toll money towards fixing hamptons and richmonds roads they useum let them pay forum.
9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mr Kaine. I got your money right here. It's called putting the Dulles Metrorail Project out to a good, fair process of bidding. That should free up some money for you. Or, are you so deep under the covers with Bechtel right now that you can't see the light?
10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What, Gerry's not out of touch, is he?
48 agree | 40 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree