Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The five-member board comprised of the mayor, City Council president, director of Department of Pubic Works, city comptroller and the chief city solicitor has long been criticized for being less than transparent.
But now the inner dealings of the board, and the ties between city contractors and elected officials are front and center as investigators probe the relationship between Mayor Sheila Dixon and Ronald Lipscomb, a prominent city contractor.
Investigators allege Dixon received gifts from Lipscomb in 2003 and 2004 while she served as president of the board, voting favorably for contracts that benefited his company, Doracon.
But even longtime critics of the mayor said the investigation points to a flawed process for awarding city contracts.
“The issue is much bigger than Sheila Dixon,” said Del. Jill Carter, an opponent of Dixon in the 2007 mayor’s race.
“Dixon was one vote on a Board of Estimates she did not control. They all voted ‘Yes’ on those contracts.”
“Sheila Dixon didn’t vote ‘Yes’ because she wanted a fur coat. She voted ‘Yes’ because she wanted to become the mayor. Joan Pratt didn’t get a fur coat, but she voted ‘Yes.’ ”
The ongoing probe has prompted at least one council member to seek a new law to make contracting more transparent.
“If we had greater transparency on the board this never would have happened,” said city Councilwoman Belinda Conaway, who will introduce a bill at the next City Council meeting that would require all checks written for city services be posted online.
“We need to allow people to know what’s being spent and who is getting the money.”
City Councilwoman Mary Pat Clarke, who formerly served as president of the Board of Estimates during her tenure as council president from 1987-1993, said the mayor calls the shots on all city development deals.
“The president has the power of persuasion and the power of the agenda, but basically the mayor has the votes,”
For his part, Gov. Martin O’Malley who was mayor while Dixon served as president of the board, told WJZ-13 he had no knowledge of Dixon’s relationship with Lipscomb.
“I hope that everything works out for the best for Mayor Dixon. I know she was a very strong partner of mine during the years I served the city of Baltimore and I hope things work out.”
sjanis@baltimoreexaminer.com
lbroadwater@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
11:44 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Official seeks new contract law, more transparency in process"
Report as inappropriate
11:43 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "Official seeks new contract law, more transparency in process"
Report as inappropriate
6:19 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "Official seeks new contract law, more transparency in process"
Report as inappropriate
10:44 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Official seeks new contract law, more transparency in process"
Report as inappropriate
9:23 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Official seeks new contract law, more transparency in process"
Report as inappropriate
6:32 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Official seeks new contract law, more transparency in process"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
The issue IS much bigger than Sheila Dixon. The issue is Martin O'Malley.
4 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No, O'Malley did not say he had no knowledge of Dixon's relationship with Lipscombe. He said, "I DON'T BELIEVE that I was aware of their relationship at the time".
3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
lead's overstated. correct that bd estimates approves lots of big-ticket projects. but if the city budget approved by the council isn't also about "politics and money," what is? baltimore development corp., the shadow government, also has enormous influence in the tax breaks and other govt giveaways to developers, hmm?
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Carter makes a good point insofar as all of the members of the BD of Estimates voted in line with what the mayor wanted. O'Malley was the one pushing these contracts. Look at how much money he got in contributions too. The city council and delegation to Annapolis also acted as his employees. In fact, the only elected officials I know of that have not gone along with absolutely EVERYTHING O'Malley spearheaded is Del. Jill Carter, and to a lesser degree Councilwoman Conaway. Interestingly, they are the ones speaking out in this article. Dixon AND O'Malley are unethical.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There were/are laws in place currently to avoid this corruption, Dixon simply didnt abide by them. Mayor Dixon was legally bound to report the gifts. She is also legally bound to NOT accept gifts from people who have "interests" in city business, she choose to try to circumvent those laws. If the current laws are simply disregarded then why would more laws end corruption at Baltimore City Hall. Dixon and others are going down on this, and they should. Dont blame me I voted for Jill Carter!!
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why can't Baltimore City fdollow the lead of our esteemed governor and put in place the kind of absolute transparency he has established for the state?
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree