Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
State Sen. Bobby Zirkin, a longtime advocate for improved juvenile justice service, is upset at the sale to a for-profit group and the possible reopening of a large-scale treatment facility.
“This is not what the legislature has been asking for,” Zirkin told The Examiner. If it reopens, “all of our efforts to move to regional small facilities have been for naught.”
In a related development, this afternoon Gov. Martin O’Malley is expected to announce the resolution of U.S. Justice Department restrictions on two other juvenile prisons in Maryland — Cheltenham and Hickey school, according to The Associated Press.
Josh White, a local lobbyist for Rite of Passage, the Nevada group, said the Board of Public Works is simply being asked to grant permission for sale of the Carroll County site and buildings on which the state has filed a lien. Once Rite of Passage acquired the site from Walden Real Estate and the former operators for around $7 million, it would then have to apply for a license to run the facility, he said.
The number of beds that ROP would seek to operate has not been determined yet, White said. “Those questions still need to be answered.”
The capacity is more than 100 beds, White said.
Zirkin said the state should not continue to support such large facilities and he is especially leery of handing over state-held juveniles to a for-profit firm.
Zirkin said he planned on contacting all three members of the board — the governor, state comptroller and state treasurer — before they approve the sale.
llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
9:36 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008 re: "O’Malley, team defend sale of former troubled youth facility"
Report as inappropriate
9:03 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "O’Malley, team defend sale of former troubled youth facility"
Report as inappropriate
5:02 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "O’Malley, team defend sale of former troubled youth facility"
Report as inappropriate
2:13 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "O’Malley, team defend sale of former troubled youth facility"
Report as inappropriate
12:10 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "State eyes selling Bowling Brook to Nevada-based Rite of Passage"
Report as inappropriate
10:06 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Family of teen killed at Bowling Brook files $207M suit"
Report as inappropriate
3:33 PM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008
re: "Family of teen killed at Bowling Brook files $207M suit"
Report as inappropriate
5:57 AM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008
re: "Family of teen killed at Bowling Brook files $207M suit"
Report as inappropriate
9:29 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008
re: "Family of teen killed at Bowling Brook files $207M suit"
Report as inappropriate
9:55 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Bowling Brook staff members turn themselves in to police"
Report as inappropriate
7:07 AM MST on Fri., Jan. 4, 2008
re: "Counselors want charges dismissed"
Report as inappropriate
7:29 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 2, 2008
re: "Counselors want charges dismissed"
Report as inappropriate
5:50 PM MST on Wed., Jan. 2, 2008
re: "Counselors want charges dismissed"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Follow the money. O'Malley is dirty.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Owe'Malley is a liar. He lies about helping working families, he lies about lowering BG&E and he lied about stopping the LNG plant.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No kidding. O'Malley defends his heartless, corrupt, decision.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
johnn said:
remember thease words there coming to get you martin,and soon !and all your flunkys,shelia,shawn malone,miller,and bush
5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
hey, martha! get me rewrite (and no-doz)! At today’s Board of Public Works meeting, the state is proposing to sell the former Bowling Brook juvenile facility where a youth died in custody this past year to a Nevada-based group that runs juvenile facilities
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
this is so stupid. they just want to get rich, there have been other cases but the money being asked for is around 25 million. this is the most amount of mony i have ever seen being asked for over a death in school. if they win this money then it's like they win the lottery. that money could be put to better use than to molify the parents loss.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
“They stole possibilities. They stole opportunities. They stole his life.” Darn, they stole the chance for him to be released and commit more of the same crimes that put him there. Boo Hoo
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Can we get a little background on the teen? This story is light on details, we need more before forming an opinion. I'm assuming that they didn't just start restraining him for no reason.
6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
suing for 1 million for each minute their son suffered? That's so lame, they're just trying to get rich. Losers, they raised the child baldy and expect to get paid for it? No way, they don't deserve that much money.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is a well know peer from the school and I think that they should be charged for killing that boy because they dont listen to people when they say that the stuff that they be doing hurt really bad.It hurt so bad that you feel like your dead,and also they ceature the problem just so they can put you throw that kind of pain.So with that being said I think that they should get atleast 25 to 50 years a peace.But I can say this MR.Dennis was a good person and he would not try to hurt anyone.Thank you for your time.(P.S DO THE RIGHT THING AND PUT THEM AWAY)
7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Independent Marylander said:
The "court of public opinion" is a little short on facts. The Grand Jury indicted based on the facts presented after the investigation of the incident. Soon there will be a trial to determine whether the facts merit a finding of guilt or acquittal. The standard for guilt is "proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and to a moral certainty." Anything short results in a finding of "not guilty." This is our system...live with it.
67 agree | 71 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
The Undertaker said:
They want the charges dismissed. And I want a million dollars and the girl that I am obsessed with to love me.
80 agree | 74 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
They should be charged with first degree murder.END OF STORY
67 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree