Multimedia News

Nicole Kidman celebrates world premier of 'Australia'
20 photos
Australian actor Nicole Kidman waves as she w...
Stars bid fond farewell to MTV's 'TRL'
20 photos
Taylor Swift poses in the press room during M...
Victoria's Secret fashion show
20 photos
A model walks the runway during Victoria's Se...
Ice hot highlights of the Figure Skating Grand Prix
19 photos
Mao Asada of Japan performs during a training...
Cowboys of the CMAs
20 photos
Brad Paisley, left, and Keith Urban perform d...

Agencies reach pact to help foster youths

Jun 23, 2008 3:00 AM (149 days ago) by Beth Winegarner, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Melina Stoney entered foster care at the age of 16; she graduated from Lowell High School in 2007 and is an undergraduate at Clark Atlanta University.
(Cindy Chew/The Examiner)
Melina Stoney entered foster care at the age of 16; she graduated from Lowell High School in 2007 and is an undergraduate at Clark Atlanta University.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Schools have been slow to implement sweeping legislation passed four years ago to protect foster youths’ educational rights, but a new agreement between 27 San Francisco offices and schools is aimed at making schooling smoother for kids in foster care.

Assembly Bill 490, which took effect in January 2004, requires schools to do everything they can to make sure foster youths stay in the same school even when they change families, and to transfer students’ records within two days when they must change schools. Doing so helps provide some stability in otherwise very unstable lives, said Maya Webb, who runs the Foster Youth Services division at the San Francisco Unified School District.

When a foster youth changes schools, it can set the student back four to six months, especially when records don’t follow. And foster youth tend to move a lot. Jeff Perry, educational advocate with Court-Appointed Special Advocates, has one charge who changed schools 11 times before he reached seventh grade.

Last year, SFUSD’s foster-youth services were funded by a $342,151 federal grant, spokeswoman Gentle Blythe said.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Under an agreement adopted last week by the San Francisco Board of Education, a plethora of agencies that manage pieces of foster youths’ lives — from schools to school-district agencies to The City’s juvenile probation, court and public health departments — pledged to keep student records up to date so the 600 foster youth in San Francisco public schools don’t fall behind.

It takes so many agencies in part because foster youth have higher incidences of truancy and special-education needs, Webb said.

Melina Stoney, who graduated from Lowell High School in 2007, was relatively lucky. Despite being raised in an abusive home and entering foster care at 16 with her two sisters, she is now an undergraduate at Clark Atlanta University.

“Most of these kids, they’ve had to grow up so fast,” she said. “We have to be responsible for ourselves.”

bwinegarner@sfexaminer.com

Foster youths by the numbers

» There are more than 500,000 children and youths in foster care in the United States; approximately 20,000 youths “age out” or emancipate from foster care each year.

» 100,000 foster youths live in California.

» 33 percent of children in foster care are Hispanic, 32 percent are black, 31 percent are white, 3 percent are Asian/Pacific Islander and 1 percent are American Indian.

» Up to 50 percent of former foster/probation youths become homeless within the first 18 months of emancipation.

» Youths in foster care are 44 percent less likely to graduate from high school.

Source: On The Move Bay Area, Families for Children

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

4:35 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 14, 2008 re: "New law meant to improve stability for foster care"

Tiffani Howard said:
No oversight and more money an interesting brew that affords more hardship on American Families. Have we not learned anything from the recent true stories of the deaths of children by their foster or adopted parents. Our government keeps putting efforts on the back end as appossed to prevention, igonoring the needs of some to justify the desires of others. Where is the money to ensure the needs of the family and children are propoerly assesed? Where is the money to provide extended services to indigent families for healthcare, loss of housing and income, etc. What about children in which the goal is reunification. Wexler is right, should there not also be incentives for reunification? I would think that Congress always considering the fiscal impact of any type of legislature would lean towards more restorative services in order to help families and children to stay together. Children remaining in the home would cost considerably less than being in care. www.OneOutOfMany.org

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:07 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 14, 2008 re: "New law meant to improve stability for foster care"

Lois Hafler said:
I agree 100% with the previous comment. Our government is so corrupt and they are stealing kids to sell to strangers for profit. The folks who don't believe this have not yet been contacted by CPS.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement