Multimedia News

Grammy Nominations Concert highlights
20 photos
Christina Aguilera arrives at 'The Grammy Nom...
Rockefeller Center Christmas tree lights up
20 photos
People look on from office windows as the Roc...
Celestial love triangle
20 photos
The crescent moon is accompanied by planets V...
Britney's back with new album, tour
20 photos
Singer Britney Spears performs on ABC's 'Good...
World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...

City parks granted millions to rebuild

Jun 18, 2008 3:00 AM (169 days ago) by Staff, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Three San Francisco parks will be rebuilt in an $8 million project that begins this week, according to the nonprofit Trust for Public Land.

Yomi Agunbiade, the general manager of the Recreation and Park Department, will join Mayor Gavin Newsom, TPL representatives and officials from four of The City’s largest companies at Hayes Valley Playground on Thursday to help launch a San Francisco chapter of the nationwide Parks for People campaign.

According to the TPL, Hayes Valley Playground in Hayes Valley/Western Addition, Balboa Park in the Excelsior and Boeddeker Park in the Tenderloin are scheduled to be rebuilt with a $4 million challenge grant.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:04 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 15, 2008 re: "City parks granted millions to rebuild"

Examiner Reader said:
Can we get just a few more high-end condos with trendy, expensive shops underneath them, too?

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:06 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 14, 2008 re: "City parks granted millions to rebuild"

Rational Thinker said:
Voters errantly passed a measure to landscape SFPORT when the money would have been better spent on neighborhood parks. BTW: This land is already officially considered to be open space, Ms. Puri is hyping the diversion of $$$$$$ to this SFPort property.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:50 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008 re: "City parks granted millions to rebuild"

King of the Dynasty said:
Parks are worse than ever. Fire parks GM Agunbiade.

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:04 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "Improvement funds not being put into play"

A.Goodman @ PRO said:
Amazing, as usual the money is put in a leaky sieve and disappears down the drain. Can you say "slush-fund" its sad that the bonds are played in such a manner, that parks are the victims, schools get sold off (see SF Business Times selling of 8 public sites proposal) and the infrastructure crumbles, such as water, waste, and transit. While towers of silver are spun in the city for the wealthy newcomers of the city. The parks are key, green space is key, the loss of this out-door ammenities, and the poorly worded bond measures placing these items on the renter's (see prior PROP-A that placed 50% on tenants, and just proposed 70% bond pass-through on water/infrastructure. Audits are required, common sense is that state funds and local funds are being swindled. Enough is enough, demand citywide accountability for the expenditures, so that a kids playground is maintained, and public open space, and facilities are adequately funded to their completion. A.Goodman @ PRO

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:09 PM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008 re: "Improvement funds not being put into play"

Examiner Reader said:
the resistance to volunteers working in the parks is simple- we don't want scab labor working next to us. it's bad enough that we have to babysit a bunch of martha stewart/politico wannabes with their "projects". the volunteers themselves have good intentions, but they're being mislead by a group of grant mongers who make money while the volunteers work for free. it's scab labor in the guise of advocacy. a parks gardener

3 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement