Examiners

Paula Duffy
Sports Examiner
Most Recent Post
Final MLB Division Series results
David Pinto
Baseball Examiner
Most Recent Post
Lovable no more

California News

Multimedia News

Elections 2008: On the trail
20 photos
Demonstrators protest against Republican pres...
Tech successes
20 photos
Asustek CEO Jerry Shen, center, stands with m...
Hoops here it comes
20 photos
The Detroit Pistons' Rodney Stuckey (3) shoot...
Madonna's 'Sticky and Sweet' Concert Photos
20 photos
Madonna performs in concert during her 'Stick...
French Fashion Show
20 photos
A model wears a creation by French fashion de...

Nationals activate Lo Duca

Jun 18, 2008 12:00 AM (111 days ago) by Brian McNally, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The plan was to have 23-year-old catcher Jesus Flores learn his trade for a full season in the minor leagues. The plan was for veterans Paul Lo Duca and Johnny Estrada, both signed to one-year contracts in the offseason, to anchor that position and provide punch to an anemic offense.

Necessity has forced the Nationals to throw the plan out the window.

Lo Duca, 36, broke his right hand in early May. Estrada, 31, never fully recovered from offseason elbow surgery. Both went on the disabled list May 9 and Flores (.311, four home runs, 25 RBI), recalled from Triple-A Columbus, quickly morphed into the Nats’ most consistent hitter.

Lo Duca was finally reinstated from the disabled list on Tuesday and recalled from a rehabilitation assignment at Columbus. But manager Manny Acta confirmed last week that Flores would remain the starter. Estrada has yet to begin his minor-league rehab.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“It’s tough to say that anybody was expecting Flores to be doing what he’s doing,” Acta told MLB.com over the weekend. “If we’re predicting that we would have never sent him [to the minors] or [been] signing any of those guys.” 

Lo Duca immediately was penciled into the lineup for last night’s game against the Minnesota Twins at designated hitter. According to Acta, Lo Duca will see time at catcher, first base and left field. In 17 games prior to last night, Lo Duca was 10-for-50 (.200) with three doubles and four RBI. He signed a one-year, $5 million contract in December.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

9:17 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 5, 2008 re: "Rookie Balester is beginning to gain confidence"

Examiner Reader said:
Collin Balester is the real deal. His fastball is his #1 pitch however that Changeup of his is#1A. He brings life and energy to the Clubhouse and he will be a positive influence on the Nats for years to come. Quoting Balester..." I want to play baseball til I'm 50 years old!!" Tongue in cheek. Ask J Moyer for the "How do you do that" Book!! Go Nats!

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:46 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 18, 2008 re: "Council considers raising taxes on Nationals tickets"

Examiner Reader said:
Not paying the rent? Kick them out! They are a losing team anyway.

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:18 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008 re: "No easy access near ballpark for disabled"

Examiner Reader said:
Now how did "progressive, caring" DC happen to forget about the Americans with Disabilities Act which requires that public facility projects consider access for the disabled?

12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:32 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008 re: "Shuttle service, beer sales among issues still to work out before Opening Day"

Examiner Reader said:
"The most extreme example might be June 29, when United faces off against David Beckham and the L.A. Galaxy as 12:30 p.m., and the Nationals play the Baltimore Orioles an hour later." well that was some brilliant scheduling there....lets stuff 100,000 people into the area over a two hour span

12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:34 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Examiner Reader said:
Considering where the new stadium is, you can bet that the cost of security will skyrocket!!!

13 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:58 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Examiner Reader said:
If DC knew that they couldn't afford to pay the police department they shouldn't have never opened up the Stadium. You have so many poor people living in the DC area and all the taxes we citizens have to pay could have been going into better use. we have to pay all this money and we are not going to see where the money is going. Who cares, right.

11 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:47 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Mike Licht said:
Re:$2M owed for security at Nats games -- Since the "quasi-governmental" D.C. Sports and Entertainment Commission won't pay the $2 million it owes the Metropolitan Police Department for security at Nats games, why not get those "quasi" Commission members and paid staff out directing traffic on game days? At $55 an hour, it should only take them 36,364 person-hours to work off their debt.

13 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:06 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Examiner Reader said:
"Whether the [commission] is paying it or MPD is paying it, it comes out of the same pot,” Mayor Adrian Fenty’s spokeswoman Carrie Brooks said in a statement. WHAT? Good grief, no wonder the city is in so much trouble. Everyone is aware the budget process means nothing in D.C., and that is why money is misspent and missing everywhere, but to come out an officially admit it, wow - good work Brooks.

12 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:23 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 10, 2008 re: "Police: Nearly $2M owed for security at Nats games"

Examiner Reader said:
The city charges baseball $55.00 per hour, the officers are paid their regular hourly rate. For most officers that about $32.00 per hour. What is the city doing with the difference?

12 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:01 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"

Mike Licht said:
miqcie: Art is good. The DC government should make sure that it is part of the environment throughout our city, and encourage the community cultural groups and gifted DC artists who create it. The stadium is private property, owned by the Lerner family, who can well afford to buy their own art.

296 agree | 319 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:10 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"

miqcie said:
I'm hopeful that this funding will be restored and is appropriate use of financing for public art. As a denizen of this city, I'd don't mind a part of my tax dollars going to projects like this that are truly community goods.

327 agree | 299 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:17 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Nationals’ stadium art project at a standstill"

Mike Licht said:
The Commission claimed the site-specific art for the private baseball stadium was just being "loaned" to the stadium but still owned by the commission. That is like saying your dental work is on loan from someone else. Public art projects like this are normally paid for by the developer, and the public arts agency gives technical assistance in the project's execution. This poor judgment by the Commission has cost the DC arts community $850,000 in much-needed capital funds.

354 agree | 300 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:46 AM MST on Tue., May. 22, 2007 re: "Deal should clear the way for stadium art"

Mike Licht said:
Update: The deal is now for a $206,000+ site-specific sculpture to be "loaned" to the stadium by the DC Arts Commission. That is like saying that you "borrow" your dental work, an obvious falsehood. Shame.

360 agree | 354 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement