Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
“When you move into a developed community, you expect it to stay the way it is,” the Ellicott City resident said.
The new houses built on subdivided lots crowd the neighbors, cause flooding from inadequate storm-water facilities, demolish trees and ruin the character of the neighborhood, which is dotted with large lots and custom homes built mostly in the 1950s, said Boyter.
Boyter and some neighbors bemoan so-called infill development, which is squeezing homes into existing neighborhoods. In one lot near Boyter’s MacAlpine Road home, a stone and brick home shares its front yard with two large, two-story aluminum houses.
Infill development is happening across the area, as homeowners feel the financial pressures to sell part of their land to developers or want to boost profit when they sell. But this raises community concerns, said Jeff Long, deputy director of the Baltimore County Office of Planning. “It comes down to compatibility and expectations,” he said.
In Howard, County Council members are debating legislation aimed at curbing infill. Landowners can preserve certain small residential lots and sell the right to build to a developer. The developer can then transfer those building rights to a denser project to be built on land of at least 15 acres.
The legislation “is designed to provide an option for residents considering subdivision,” said the bill’s sponsor, Council Chairwoman Courtney Watson, D-District 1.
Several residents in Watson’s district testified at a public hearing this week in favor of the legislation, including Diane Butler, vice president of the St. Johns Lane Community Association.
“Infill is destroying our neighborhood,” said Butler.
Some Columbia residents had protested the bill, saying they didn’t want the problem transferred to their neighborhoods and the complex zoning of Columbia is already being overhauled to allow for revitalization. Watson has agreed to exclude Columbia from the areas that would receive density.
Meanwhile, Baltimore County relies on a Design Advisory Panel to review developments in certain neighborhoods to ensure compatibility, Long said.
If done right, infill development can follow the state’s Smart Growth policy, which targets development to areas with existing infrastructure, he said.
“I think it’s consistent with Smart Growth as long as the impacts aren’t so great that they devalue the property,” Long said.
smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
8:13 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Howard land-use group releases recommendations to involve public"
Report as inappropriate
11:25 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Two Council proposals take aim at the ‘infill’ development"
Report as inappropriate
5:13 AM MST on Sun., Feb. 3, 2008
re: "Ulman seeks to scrap plans for new government campus"
Report as inappropriate
4:29 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 11, 2008
re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"
Report as inappropriate
7:34 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008
re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"
Report as inappropriate
1:09 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007
re: "Council questions office-space purchase"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
This task force was heavily skewed toward the land development community.
8 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
We are an extremly confused nation. We are not creating new urban areas, we are growing by about 2 million people a year, we want affordable housing, we want long time resident to never have to move, we don't want change or more density with 'infill', we want continued mass immigration -- often the same people and political parties are for all these things.
78 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I can't believe Ulman would waste over $7 million by abandoning plans, while at the same time giving his donor buddy a sweetheart lease with County funds. Wait a minute - I can believe it because Ulman is a deceptive arrogant jerk who slanders Mary Kay Sigaty to steal an election.
87 agree | 89 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Traffic engineers wouldn’t stay in business if they used false assumptions or data" Why not? Politicians stay in business when they use false data on their resumes. "Secretary of the Cabinet" anyone?
89 agree | 93 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Any protests to traffic conditions, etc., under Howard County's new administration will be ignored. What Mr. Ulman wants, Mr. Ulman will get. Remember this the next time you go to the polls.
91 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Doesn't a contributor to Ulman own the building where Ulman wants to sign an overpriced lease? But, just because someone fakes their resume to get elected, doesn't mean they will continue their dishonesty once in office...
111 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree