CHANGE MY LOCATION
Entertainment
California News
Multimedia News
Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
)
Edward Norton stars as The Incredible Hulk and his alter ego, Dr. Bruce Banner.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - If French director Louis Leterrier’s goal in rebooting the “Hulk” saga for the big screen was to distance Marvel’s franchise from Ang Lee’s brooding 2003 deconstruction of the not-so-jolly green giant, you’d have to consider “The Incredible Hulk” a rousing success: While Lee incurred the wrath of comic-book disciples with his thoughtful character study, Leterrier and screenwriter Zak Penn dispense with the angst and focus on the smash.
The result is a movie that eschews dialogue (or anything resembling an idea) in favor of hyper-violent mayhem and unconvincing CGI.
Leterrier’s “Hulk” conspicuously avoids much reference to Lee’s story, and makes little effort to explain its oversized hero’s genetic disposition to fits of searing rage, save for a photo montage in the opening credits. Instead, we find Dr. Bruce Banner (Edward Norton), the Hulk’s mild-mannered alter ego, in the Brazilian backwoods, seeking an antidote to his condition and practicing anger management.
His serenity is short-lived. Hunted by old nemesis General Thaddeus “Thunderbolt” Ross (William Hurt, reprising the role inhabited more ably by Sam Elliott) and Ross’ sneering henchman Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth), the Hulk sees his infamous temper flare early and often, even as his still-smitten ex (Liv Tyler) tries to talk him down.
As he was in Lee’s film, Banner is unwilling to embrace his dark side and obsessed with his quest for a cure, but that doesn’t stop him from laying waste to his old school and, in the film’s climactic finale, Harlem.
“The Incredible Hulk,” which Norton helped rewrite, marks the actor’s first foray into the superhero universe, and while the results are mixed at best, that is less attributable to his performance, which is competent if rarely compelling, than to a script that falls resoundingly flat. Character development falls by the wayside, and Leterrier’s “Hulk,” catering shamelessly to fans of breathless, nonstop action, comes across as one-dimensional if not downright dull.
Unlike Robert Downey Jr., who invested his own smart-alecky persona in “Iron Man” alter ego Tony Stark, Norton fails to distinguish himself as Banner, except for his sleek, sinewy physique. Roth, who morphs into Hulk’s towering rival, The Abomination, thanks to some genetic meddling of his own, is sufficiently fearsome in a role that could well have been fleshed out, but this is a movie about animated monsters, not human beings.
On that level, “The Incredible Hulk” is only intermittently engaging, with its artificial-looking protagonist and uneven effects. It’s telling that the movie’s most exciting moment comes in the form of a cameo by Downey, on loan from a superior fantasy that delivers artfully conceived action without sacrificing the intelligence of its characters. Unfortunately, Leterrier’s “Hulk” is no “Iron Man.”
CREDITS
The Incredible Hulk (Two stars)
Starring Edward Norton, Liv Tyler, Tim Roth, Tim Blake Nelson, William Hurt
Written by Zak Penn, Edward Norton
Directed by Louis Leterrier
Rated PG-13
Running time 1 hour 54 minutes
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:35 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 6, 2008 re: "Review: A thrilling ‘Dark Knight’"
Report as inappropriate
10:29 PM MST on Mon., Sep. 15, 2008
re: "Misfits and misspellings: ‘Son of Rambow’ is a sweet homage to 1980s"
Report as inappropriate
7:54 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 7, 2008
re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"
Report as inappropriate
9:18 PM MST on Sat., Sep. 6, 2008
re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"
Report as inappropriate
1:15 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 1, 2008
re: "Review: Streep saves ‘Mamma Mia!’"
Report as inappropriate
5:58 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008
re: "Review: Serviceable ‘X-Files’ stands alone"
Report as inappropriate
11:41 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 20, 2008
re: "Review: Streep saves ‘Mamma Mia!’"
Report as inappropriate
5:55 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008
re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"
Report as inappropriate
12:23 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "Review: A profile of a ‘Gonzo’ guy"
Report as inappropriate
10:46 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"
Report as inappropriate
3:59 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008
re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"
Report as inappropriate
9:31 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008
re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"
Report as inappropriate
10:43 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008
re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"
Report as inappropriate
1:22 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008
re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"
Report as inappropriate
10:25 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008
re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"
Report as inappropriate
9:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008
re: "Review: The girls are back in town"
Report as inappropriate
5:31 PM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008
re: "Review: Goin’ back to ‘Indiana’"
Report as inappropriate
3:32 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008
re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"
Report as inappropriate
3:28 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008
re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"
Report as inappropriate
8:25 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008
re: "No need for hollow, horribly acted ‘Speed’"
Report as inappropriate
12:00 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Review: Terrorism enters stoned age"
Report as inappropriate
5:18 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008
re: "Review: ‘Nights’ can leave you feeling blue"
Report as inappropriate
8:44 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008
re: "Review: Caught in the net of 'Spiderwick’"
Report as inappropriate
6:38 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007
re: "Review: ‘Lions for Lambs’ more like medicine than a movie"
Report as inappropriate
1:26 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007
re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"
Report as inappropriate
1:30 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 2, 2007
re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"
Report as inappropriate
3:18 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 1, 2007
re: "Unbalanced, powerful ‘Sicko’ a movie that matters"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007
re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"
Report as inappropriate
Linda Baker said:
I WAS IN TOTAL AWE OF HOW HE WAS ABLE TO GRAB EVERYONE'S ATTENTION WHEN HE IS ON THE SCREEN. Nobody should ever try to duplicate his act. I believe it was an Oscar winning performance.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
the movie rawked;)
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
awesome movie you suck for sayin that i think you at wits end orlando is the hottest guy ever!!!
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Barbara said:
orlando bloom is the hotest actor in pirates of the caribbean
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Bizarre movie! What a waste of time and money!
12 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
the X-files should be filed under Y. the movie didn't make any sense or conformed to the t.v. series. it's about the unknown, the ufo thing. this was about sicky characters who like to cut up people and put them together like frankensteins.
12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I liked the movie Mama Mia. I saw it with my daughter and thougt it was refreshing... so what that some didn't have thesinging voice but the laughter was always there. I recommend this movie to anyone who just wants to laugh and leave life for a short time. I am not one for musicals and was not happy that my daughter picked this but I was so glad she did!! FUN FUN FUN!!!!
13 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Why, after an hour of pratfalls, try to reinvent Hancock as a somber second coming of the Caped Crusader? I like the idea of a disgraced superhero struggling to rehabilitate his image." This specific comment leads me to believe that you missed the point, and that you would rather drop a clever phrase in your own creation, your critique, than do your job as a critic and evaluate fully what was given to you (instead of "what if?") By the way, "Caped Crusader" is a name most often attributed to Bruce Wayne's alter ego, not the "aww, gee" squeaky clean Superman (which I believe is what you inferred). The ending, which focused on the familiar comic themes, of self sacrifice and the powers of the ordinary were very satisfying for this comic fan. The questions left unanswered in the movie are what number one issues are made of. I have a complaint: more of the title's credit should have been given to Bateman and Theron in my opinion. Hancock, albeit misnamed, was a great introduction.
16 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gone. So? said:
So many seemingly brilliant alcoholic/addicts whose works became extremely popular through the mass media during the latter half of the twentieth century have had such an endelible influence on American culture that by now you'd expect one of them to perhaps become President of the United States. Oh yeah, right, one already has.
21 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
MrHyphy said:
Hancock is a good movie end of story.
18 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
just came back from seeing a movie that i thought would be great but it WAS SOME GARBAGE DON'T WAIST UR TIME OR MONEY VIA MOVIE THEATRE OR DVD
21 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
M. Knight is the modern day equivalent to Alfred Hithcock. I completely disagree with this review and her review of his last two movies. The Village was one his best movies, and The Lady in the Water was also a great movie. Some people just don't have minds capable of seeing outside the box and wondering what if. Case in point, Sally Kline.
22 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The movie kicked ass!
22 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You, sir, are an idiot of the highest order.
20 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This was a great movie with a great story line. But hey what would you expect from a critic.
21 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dear Ms. Katz, You are quite the bitch for revealing that "Big stands Carrie up at the = alter"! Gwen Evans
25 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
wow the review of the new Indiana Jones movie really over rates it--unlike the others it is ALL style and no substance. the movie has a return of karen allen but then does nothing with her; and what is this===Happy Days meets the X Files? it maybe but isnt an Indiana Jones movie.
27 agree | 24 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Cont...With regards to Battle for Haditha (see below): This 'rampage' point of view has been disproven. (3) There is evidence that these Marines were used as scapegoats to appease a liberal media and Anti-War sentiments in the Senate and govt like Murtha. There is evidence of undue command influence in the hubris investigation that ensued. The investigation was unprecedented. These Marines were asked to make split moment decisions under duress that most of us would be hard pressed to do differently under similar circumstances. Interesting fact from the think tank AEI: A poll of tribal leaders across Iraq was recently conducted about US elections and who they would vote for, McCain, Obama, or Clinton. A majority would vote for John McCain but in Al Anbar where Haditha occurred, the tribal leaders want to re-elect George Bush. The Iraqi leaders greatly fear us leaving b/c that would ensure the return of the henchmen who murdered and terrorized the locals. They want peace and stabilit
21 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
With regards to Battle for Haditha: To imply this movie is an accurate representation of the Haditha incident is misguided and disingenuous. This movie is far from an accurate representation of what occurred but conjecture based on misinformation. The truth of what occurred and mistakes made are coming out now. So how did the director possibly know what really happened when he made this movie? These are what we do know now: (1) The incident was a set up from insurgents who were looking to create an Iraq massacre for political gain and as part of their information operations. Al Qaeda filmed the carnage and the American and world media appeased them. (2) There is evidence from drones that there were insurgents fleeing from the buildings the Marines cleared. The Marines who cleared the buildings were not targeting civilians and were following orders. Their intentions were to ensure their own safety and not from a desire to take revenge or go on some kind of rampage. This 'rampage' poin
24 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I have heard a lot of trash about this movie, but I have to disagree. I loved it. The part most people miss is that it stays true to the cartoon that inspired it. Sure, it is hokie, far-fetched and dated, but that's just the way the cartoon was! Besides, this show has a lot of action and happy ending. Who wouldn't like that?
23 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Pretty spot-on review, but critics (even Asian Ameircan critics, who are falling over themselves to celebrate the fact that Asians are starring in a mainstream hit movie without being, well, you know, ASIAN) including Examiner's are missing he huge red flag od sexism that permrates both ,ovies but this one even more so. Yeah, so that's part and parcel of the juvenile, hormone-drenched guy genre, but it doesn't excuse the over-the-top nature of this movie's juvenalia. It almsot negates both the empowring of Asian Americans AND the bits of smart political commentary casually tossed off throughout the dialogue. And BTW, Rossiter, there are no hyphens in "Indian American" and "Korean American."
23 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Melisa said:
The movie was alright - I enjoyed all the cinematic imagery, but I esp. loved the music in the film. I just bought the soundtrack and I can't stop listening to it - really great!
36 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I read the books and I am an adult female that enjoys a good fantasy book without romance in it. Yes, the books are a bit different, but the story line moved quite well even though it was much different from the books. Well done. My whole family watched it and it was entertaining to us.
119 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
mandela said:
"Lions for lambs" is a colossal bore.
253 agree | 222 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Pirates of the Caribbean(all 3)have to be the best movies i have ever seen. This is an extremely harsh review of a completely AWEsome movie! I mean come on there had to be something this reviewer liked about it.
300 agree | 291 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
RE: POTC3 - I found it to be highly entertaining-which is what a movie is supposed to be! Hey, some liked it, some didn't - so what? Johnny Depp made all 3 movies fun to watch (he IS very easy on the eyes)! A lot of people loved it - hence its popularity. Fantasy pictures are fun - much needed in today's world. There are many "serious" movies with plots so convoluted a person would leave the theater confused. With POTC a person could leave the theater laughing (hang the plots) and wanting more. I think sometimes even critics don't know what they want in a movie. But, you can bet your bottom dollar that if there's a POTC4 it'll be a hit - again, hang the "plots", bring on the characters and the FUN! And if the first 3 didn't float your boat then stay home!
329 agree | 324 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I agree with Sally Kline's assessment of Michael Moore's documentary... the film left me thoroughly disgusted with the American healthcare system and disenchanted with the ways my fellow citizens and our policy makers are influenced by the almighty dollar. It's sad and pathetic, and no solution seems in sight...
583 agree | 395 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jackie said:
I love4 you Johnny and please make more films with you as the pirate I think you are the greattest
602 agree | 378 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree