Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

More riders squeezing onto Metrorail as gas costs force commuters off roads

Jun 11, 2008 12:00 AM (174 days ago) by Taryn Luntz, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Metro’s already-packed railcars are being crammed even tighter as area residents flee the highways.

With the transit system experiencing record-breaking ridership days in rapid succession as gas prices surge, Metro officials are considering putting retired buses back in service and adding more eight-car trains if the trend escalates, General Manager John Catoe said in an exclusive interview with The Examiner.

“Every day now we’re getting closer to 800,000 per day on the rail system, and that’s been happening very quickly,” Catoe said.

“The only thing to attribute that to is people are shifting from their automobiles, because it’s not that there’s this big surge of new jobs,” he said. “That’s not happening — it’s going in the opposite direction.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

While Metrorail averaged 702,171 weekday riders during fiscal 2007 — the first year in the system’s history that the average passed the 700,000 mark — the railway now is routinely seeing close to or more than 800,000 riders a day, with most of the passengers traveling during rush hour.

Metro carried 812,812 passengers June 3, 819,687 passengers on Thursday and 795,322 riders on Friday, all days when the Washington Nationals had home games.

Metro’s ridership record was set in June 2004, when 850,636 people traveled on the system the day of Ronald Reagan’s state funeral.

“We still have some room, but it will not be pleasant conditions,” Catoe said. “It’s going to be like a Nats game — sometimes a few trains will come before you can get on, and you have to just line up and wait until we can get you through.

“Commutes will be longer should the ridership get up that high,” he said. “It’s like highways — there is a point where there’s no additional capacity.”

The system could handle up to 950,000 or even 1 million passengers if more riders traveled during off-peak times, Catoe said.

Catoe said he may add more eight-car trains to the system by putting a limited number of the agency’s spare railcars into service, but that move could hinder Metro’s ability to maintain the cars.

Metro runs 830 railcars out of its stock of about 1,000 every day, keeping it in line with other transit agencies, which reserve about 20 percent of their stock.

“That’s so you can do preventative maintenance — change out brakes, fix door problems, air conditioning problems,” Catoe said. “If not, and you get into a crunch, you might have to operate those cars without air conditioning. I’m not willing to make that call yet.”

The agency’s “energy contingency plan” also includes pulling its fleet of about 70 old buses out of retirement.

 “We will keep those vehicles at least in working order for a longer period of time, so that if an emergency does come, we have those vehicles to put on the street,” Catoe said.

“They’re not the most efficient vehicles, they’re not the best air-quality vehicles, they’re not the best customer-experience vehicles, but if the choice is between not being able to get around and using one of those, people are going to use them.”

tluntz@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

12:25 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "More riders squeezing onto Metrorail as gas costs force commuters off roads"

Patricia K said:
I realize that more commuters are using the system, and that I am not going to find a seat or avoid skin contact with a sweaty hairy man on a rainy day. I even accept that a couple packed trains will pass me by, lengthening my commute. It is the nauseatingly abrupt start-stop motion and stall-outs at every other stop that I abhor. Are these necessary? My commute has taken on the qualities of a sadistic psychological experiment, designed to see how much I can take without losing my mind. It is by far the most difficult portion of my day, and I know I’m not alone. Suggestions for improvement include adjusting the air conditioning to accommodate sardines at rush hour; stopping completely instead of slamming on the brakes, inching forward, and repeating; and setting an automated speed so that riders aren’t alternately subject to snails and speed demons.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:52 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Alexandria officials tie development to new stations"

Examiner examiner said:
Why does Taryn Luntz accept the estimate of $100 million for a new metrorail station without question? Is she doing her job?

93 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:56 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 5, 2007 re: "Va. House speaker has dim hopes for Metrorail extension to Dulles"

Examiner Reader said:
Presently there is only one Metro Bus route that services Dulles. Seems like Metro would set up more routes to Dulles from DC/VA/MD to prove there is a need for the rail. Meanwhile, the taxi industry will continue to bilk the public with $50 plus fares.

154 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:10 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Dulles rail vote draws criticism and praise"

County Resident said:
It's too bad that Supervisor Cathy Hudgins was not willing to wait for a better look at the costs and the risks before voting. Hunter Mill needs Marie Huhtala. This eyesore might also force real estate tax increases and compete with schools, parks and public safety for county revenue. We need a new county board of supervisors.

232 agree | 259 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:54 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 6, 2007 re: "Rail issue a focal point in election year"

Examiner Reader said:
The County is being burdened with an uncapped 16.!% of costs, which is guaranteed to rise, as the contract is structured. Worse yet the County has not even seen the Contract documents. Even to see a redacted version a week for a major vote on a $3 B project, this is not displaying fiscal prudence on the part of the County stewards. It is not only that the best option is not getting built, but the Stewards of the County have been quite deficient. The County residents are being asked to pay increasing taxes every year, however, the Supervisors have not demonstrated fiduciary responsibility, while relegating the decision making to other bodies , such as the State, MWAA and others. A case in point is that the State's obligations are capped at $75M, while the County pays 5 times as much and claims to have no say in the decision making process ! Actually we are being asked to pay more than more than $800 million, along with any increases that the cartel decides to make.

297 agree | 275 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:18 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "Board may stall rail vote unless contract delivered"

Carl Lundie said:
The concept to deliver the Dulles Rail through Tysons can be "state of the art " and a place to be admired for many years to come. I have 3 questions 1) How is it possible the contractor (DPT) Dulles Transit Partners after reaching an agreement with (MWAA) Metropolitan Washington Aiports Authority and the Commonwealth of VA. to build Phase 1 on March 30, 07 a contract has not been delivered, reviewed with due diligence? 2) Who has control over the decision process ? The (DPT) set the 19 June as the vote date. Dana Kauffman, a board member asked the question Monday June 4,07. 3) Is contract expiration date June 20 or August 1,07

279 agree | 241 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:05 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "Rail issue a focal point in election year"

US Grant said:
Lynda Smyth and Gerry Connolly have got to go! They do not give a damn about constituents - only turning Fairfax and Tysons into an urban slum. It is time for people top take back the governments, local and state, and do what is right. The Tysons project is a fisaco thanks to those purported elected leaders currnently in power. Get them out - retire them!

280 agree | 262 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:36 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "FTA rejects underground rail route"

E.S. said:
Common Sense: Apparently you don't realize that by having rail go right down the toll road and straight out to the airport you'd be bypassing Tysons and lowering the ridership numbers that would be required to receive certain levels of federal and local funding for Metrorail in any form. Ridership numbers are extremely important to the approval of funding. Under your plan, you'd still need to have buses shuttling people to their jobs and homes in Tysons Corner (especially after the master plan for Tysons Corner to include more mixed-use is implemented) which would tax the transit system in other ways. Riders want convenient and direct access to their destinations without having to switch forms of transit. This is clearly evidenced by airline travel. Direct = convenient. Especially in the rapid pace of Northern Virginia and the Washington, DC area.

281 agree | 274 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:48 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "FTA rejects underground rail route"

Common Sense said:
It's time to pull the plug on rail through Tysons. Put the Silver Line back in the median of the Dulles Toll Road. That way, we get rail to Dulles, without risking such huge cost overruns. This plan would avoid the ugly El and the huge increases in density for Tysons Corner landowners that would likely add even more traffic to our roads.

778 agree | 296 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:29 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "Review of Metrorail plan delayed again"

E.S. said:
I guess the roadside banner photo says it all. Delays. Wouldn't it be nice if they'd just open up competition so we could get an honest shake on the deal? Instead the little secret trimmings here and there to get costs down may just jeopardize Metro coming to Dulles altogether.

270 agree | 233 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:42 PM MST on Fri., May. 4, 2007 re: "Citizens group blasts secrecy of Dulles rail"

Surprised - Not said:
Gee I wonder where Gerry Connolly was when the Examiner called! Probably conducting county business in private.

298 agree | 270 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:57 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 26, 2007 re: "Panel to pick Dulles rail station art"

E.S. said:
Marcia McAllister states in your article: “It is the goal of the Metrorail Project, working with [the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority], to identify talent and artists who can really create pieces that really speak to the environment, that speak to Tysons [Corner], that speak to Reston,” she said. I have only this response to Ms. McAllister's statement: Has your panel of judges for the proposed artwork at stations taken into consideration that the art most appropriate for the Tysons Corner "environment" with an elevated rail is referred to as "graffiti". It has "worked" in many other cities. I believe, as do others in our area, the grafitti artists who offer their creative expressions aren't exactly going to do a formal submission of their work to a judging/review panel for your approval nor will they feel that they need to restrain their creative expression or limit their subject matter to happy clouds and trees. There will plenty of art for all of us to judge.

546 agree | 270 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement