Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Columbia residents express concerns about infill proposal

Jun 11, 2008 12:00 AM (174 days ago) by Sara Michael, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - A proposal aimed at curbing new development being squeezed into established neighborhoods could harm Columbia communities, residents say.

“Don’t transfer the problem,” said Oakland Mills resident Bill McCormack, who took issue with a resolution introduced by County Council Chairwoman Courtney Watson, D-District 1.

Watson wants to preserve certain small residential lots and direct development to more dense areas.

Landowners would sell the right to build to a developer, who then could use that right to build on a more dense project.

This story continues below
Advertisement

One of the areas she proposed allowing for the transfer of that development is Columbia.

McCormack, chairman of the Oakland Mills Village Board’s housing committee, said he could sympathize with the intent of the bill to tackle so-called “infill” development, but adding Columbia as a district for more development was “unnecessary.”

“We’d like to keep the zoning density as it is so that each proposal would come before the community and the community would have ... say into it,” he said.

The county has started a review of the zoning in Columbia, which should be completed before considering the additional density, McCormack said.

Wilde Lake Village Board Chairman Vince Marando echoed the concerns, saying the proposal could add up to 10 percent more housing to the village when it undergoes redevelopment. The board is expected to take a position on the legislation this week.

Former longtime Columbia Association Board Member Barbara Russell said, “It would take a problem from [one] area and move it another area.”

Councilman Calvin Ball, D-District 2, whose district includes the villages of Long Reach and Oakland Mills, said he was concerned about how the resolution would affect the infrastructure and amenities in Columbia neighborhoods.

“I am not convinced that it would be good for our communities,” he said.

However, since the proposal was introduced as a resolution, it simply means that as the Columbia zoning regulations are rewritten, the county will consider adding Columbia as one of the areas to receive more density, Watson said.

Further, the measure would affect only a small number of houses, she added.

“This is a very, very small scale. It’s literally one house here and another house here,” she said.

smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

11:37 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Columbia residents express concerns about infill proposal"

Lifelong Columbia Resident said:
It is always about the greed. They want to cash in on the older neighborhoods with larger lots. They can build a McMansion on Wilde Lake, or stuff 2-3 homes on a 1/3rd acre lot. It is all about which developer has enough grease for the squeeky wheels in the County Council. I've lived here my entire life and Columbia is turning into a sewer like Baltimore. Our "leaders" are out of touch with reality, they only have special interest in mind when they propose legislation. This not the Columbia vision we bought into in 1968, the elitists are running the show now. And public transportation is the last thing Columbia needs, we have enough problems without importing more. If people can't afford a car what can they buy at the Mall? Look at Owings Mills after the subway went in. Why don't the folks in the county council figure out how to curb crime? Or find productive things for our children to do instead of doing drugs and having babies. Stop filling your pocket with kickbacks and do your j

1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:57 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
I used to work for Howard Co., and believe me, the current bus routes aren't full by any means. Therefore, I don't believe there is a need for more public transportation, especially in a town with affluent residents who commute. But I'm sure Ulman would love to funnel money into this anyway.

6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:12 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Funding unclear for Columbia downtown public transit plans"

Examiner Reader said:
Public transportation will not make Columbia Mall (downtown is a joke) more attractive. It will destroy the mall, just look up the road in Reisterstown. If GGP and Wells believe it is needed they are free to reach into their pockets to pay for it. They are not welcome to reach into mine.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
My vision for Columbia involves a qualified County Executive. Maybe one day Howard County will make that dream come true.

62 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:41 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 12, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
Ulman said he was going to block the tower in Columbia during his campaign. Then, he gets elected and does nothing. I can't trust this guy. His vision for Columbia likely panders to everyone, like he did to get elected.

54 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement