Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Howard officials probing ‘problem areas’ at Upper Little Patuxent watershed

Jun 9, 2008 12:00 AM (177 days ago) by Sara Michael, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - From investigating eroding river banks to trash dumps, Howard officials are taking a close look at the 17 square miles of the Upper Little Patuxent River watershed to find ways to improve water quality.

“We are identifying problem areas,” said Mark Richmond, a project engineer with Howard’s Stormwater Management Division in the county’s Department of Public Works.

A watershed study is required every five years for a Maryland Department of the Environment permit for discharges from the county’s storm-water management system, Richmond said.

“Beyond that, we want to assess all the watersheds in the county,” he said, adding this assessment is part of a second, more detailed round of studies of the watersheds.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Much of the development in the overall Little Patuxent River watershed was completed before current storm-water management practices, so the biological and physical habitat is degraded, according to the county’s 2002 Watershed Restoration Action Strategy.

From a detailed review of the Upper Little Patuxent River, officials can develop a list of priorities for improving water quality, which could include capital projects and a public education campaign.

For example, after a 2005 study of the Centennial and Wilde Lake watersheds, officials installed small rain gardens to manage storm-water runoff near Burleigh Manor Middle, Wilde Lake Middle and Centennial High schools, Richmond said.

Howard officials held a public meeting recently to tell residents about the study, and plan to hold another one in January to present a proposal for projects, Richmond said.

The Columbia Association, which owns much of the open space in Columbia, also has taken an aggressive stance on improving the watershed and will take advantage of the county review, CA spokesman Steve

Sattler said.

The CA has hired a consultant to help develop a watershed management plan and formed a watershed advisory committee to advise on community involvement and education.

“We don’t look at this as a short-term solution,” he said.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

2:19 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 7, 2008 re: "Anne Arundel businesses and homeowners protest critical-area bill"

Examiner Reader said:
Finally something to stop people from building and then getting a permit. IT ABOUT TIME!

10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:17 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 4, 2008 re: "Anne Arundel businesses and homeowners protest critical-area bill"

Examiner Reader said:
in anne arudnel county they should worry about their police department before the environ, i mean whether they allow mahjor accidents because they close down an interstate for 10 vehciles to get on or let dogs kill a goat without getting involve. i mean if you are not wearing a seat belt in anne arundel you will get a ticket but god forbid the polcie need to direct traffic. none of them know how they just close the road even while four of them sit there looking at the accident. now big brother wants to tell you whether you can cut down a tree. how about the developers, or better yet the county themselves. once a sewer gets built the county lets all these developers just move right on in. that is the problem.

10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:00 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 4, 2008 re: "Homeowners protest critical-area bill"

johnn said:
this is what people like omalley do when they want something

9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:57 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "Women at the front of the new green movement"

Examiner Reader said:
Tegiri: Sounds like a bunch of whining to me.....how come I DONT see you out there making a change..from the way you are framing your comment you must have an advanced degree or something....so when can I expect you to show up to a community of color and create sustainable change?!?!...tomorrow maybe? I think not. Stick to what you "say" you know..and not making ignorant comments

9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:21 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "Women at the front of the new green movement"

Examiner Reader said:
You don't need a degree per se when your mentor who has a master's degree was giving her hands on experience and that's what she has is EXPERIENCE so instead of getting a degree she took a break and did the groundwork and has done more things in the Bayview -Hunter's Point community than most 25 yr olds.Bill Gates didn't graduate from Harvard but he is still BILL GATES because he had hands on experience with the technology. Furthermore, The Women Policy Institute obviously thought she was good enough to receive a yearlong fellowship...ignorant people like you "tegiri" (which is a fake name by the way) make me sick...but a question we should ask is "what are you doing about EJ in your community??? "

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:42 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 27, 2008 re: "Women at the front of the new green movement"

Tegiri Nenashi said:
The education background (or the lack of thereof) is remarkable. Some college (community?), and arts? How do these people can form an educated opinion upon what technologies are good and what are bad for the environment?

11 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:12 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

Examiner Reader said:
I've discovered that at least 80% of the pile placed there is contaminated by fuel and human waste from a broken sewer pipe and the rest is probably been contaminated by contact. The City directed where to leave it. Their plan is to have all of the contaminents wash out into the community and then stick one of the contractors with the cost of moving it once it is "clean". City pays to dispose of contaminated materials, contractor pays to move uncontaminated (now you see their game). City will not share test results after "dog and pony show" of moving 12 truck loads. I'm sure we will see results once they get a good test. It is amazing that City wastes money on politically connected but utterly useless layer of "consulting" oversite (they already use RK&K, Whiting Turner & qualified good city inspectors and also 4th unnamed layer of pointless political money related oversight) , but will not pay to protect residents from contaminated material. All easily verified by good reporter

16 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:46 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Severn Savings Bank debuts largest green roof in Annapolis"

Mike said:
I bet Severn Savings wishes they had not built this green monster/white elephant now that the stock price has gone from 22 to 6...yikes!

11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:05 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "In reversal, city to remove toxic dirt"

Examiner Reader said:
nothing like a pile of dirt in the city!

12 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:57 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Toxin-laden dirt poses no threat, according to Baltimore officials"

Examiner Reader said:
You can bet on it that if the pile of dirt had been left in Roland Park, it would be gone PDQ.

13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Toxin-laden dirt poses no threat, according to Baltimore officials"

Examiner Reader said:
Solution - Either move it or put up a 12 foot high fence around it with security 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week. (whichever is cheaper.

13 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:52 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

Examiner Reader said:
Great. I live two blocks away and walk my dog past that pile of dirt. Wonderful Baltimore. Just wonderful.

14 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

johnn said:
not dixsons clean and green program is it

14 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:56 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "Greenbelt can continue preservation"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess when the salmon count is so low that wildlife agencies have to place a mandatory ban on fishing to replenish their numbers, and when the whales are about 10-15% thinner, it's a sign that the oceans are stressed out. Kudos to the state Supreme Court for protecting the ocean and giving our coasts protective areas to restore ecosystems and rejuvenate her marine life.

18 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:23 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Dark skies for solar-training plan"

Examiner Reader said:
Policy issues related to the solar program need to be vetted before money is spent, McGoldrick told The Examiner in an e-mail. The supervisor characterized Solar City’s threat to abandon The City as “greenmail.” Oh man...can someone please get goldbricker McGoldrick to get a real life, hopefully one not in public service! Geeze if this guy ran the world we would be forever spitting in the wind.

19 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:02 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
Next step: Wire Hangers!!! (Dry cleaners don't seem to want them back).

21 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
I throw everything I can into the recycling bin and let them decide.

24 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:23 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Maryland’s coastal grass continues to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
i think the bicycle built for water is a dum story

25 agree | 27 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:36 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 31, 2008 re: "It's a bicycle built for pure water, too"

Examiner Reader said:
how much will the bike cost?

26 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:48 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 29, 2008 re: "The City gets dark tonight"

Examiner Reader said:
Good. Can't wait for the criminals to do a number on the City!

24 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
there are no heading on what each paragraph is about

169 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Bob said:
What concerns me isn't so much all this green stuff; (and green is just a buzz word for Corporate America to make big bucks)what is being done to animal species being wiped off the face of the earth? Polar bear, Rhinos (being slaughered for their horns); elephants, snow tigers, and the list goes on and on;

232 agree | 187 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:43 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Examiner Reader said:
all this green is a bunch of crap....i still burn wood, drive my car alone to work (better than some smelly bus or bart) do not recycle..thats what i pay those garbagemen for. i would rather use my firplace and wood than pay Pacific Grred and Extortion zny of their rip bills.

239 agree | 198 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:21 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Audubon study sees local birds particularly threatened"

Another Examiner Reader said:
Sure nuclear power is "clean." Just ask the Chernobylites.

235 agree | 246 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:56 PM MST on Thu., May. 24, 2007 re: "Experts: Light pollution growing environmental problem"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for this article. However it needs more development, especially in the area of light trespass onto down hill property. Full cut off on level ground is not full cut off on slopes. Also, motion detectors often activate when a person walks on his own property and is detected by the neighbor's poorly designed/installed system. Please consider this in the future.

659 agree | 436 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
Al Gore should provide more support for nuclear power. When you come to the realization that we have to STOP using fossil fuels, there is nothing else that can produce the huge amount of power that would be required to replace fossil fuels. Nuclear already provides 20% of our electric power. Nuclear power is as cheap or maybe cheaper than coal, especially when you compare 'clean coal' vs. nuclear. It is time we started replacing all of our coal fired power plants with nuclear.

877 agree | 437 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:27 AM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Environmental advisers request study of county’s waste stream"

Sandy Wisner said:
Dear Kelsey, If you take 15% of one portion of a thing and 17% of another portion of the same thing, you will not get 32% of the whole. Depending on the size of the portions, you will have between 15 and 17 percent of the whole.

625 agree | 464 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement