Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The NBA rolls out the clips, trying to muster the importance of the rivalry. All it needs is a little time.
To longtime basketball fans, the matchup rekindles memories of the game at its best. However, no matter what the 2008 versions of these two teams do in these Finals, it won’t match history. Not yet at least.
For the decade known as the ’80s, the Los Angeles Lakers and Boston Celtics were two heavyweights at the top of the division, eyeing their rival from the opening day of training camp. They were the measure of one another. Ali-Frazier. McEnroe-Borg. Nicklaus-Palmer.
For 10 NBA seasons from 1979-80 and 1988-89, either the Lakers or the Celtics were part of Finals, with the two of them meeting three times and the Lakers taking two of the three. It was as great a rivalry as sports can muster.
Magic vs. Bird. Abdul-Jabbar and Worthy vs. McHale and Parrish. Michael Cooper, Byron Scott, with a touch of Bob McAdoo. Dennis Johnson, Danny Ainge — even Bill Walton getting involved.
The Lakers had the Forum and the celebrities. The Celtics had the Garden, the parquet floor and the mystique of history. Throw in Chick Hearn and Johnnie Most, and you had all every element you needed.
The thing about it then was that every basketball fan, no matter what team they rooted for all season long, took sides with passion when these two teams squared off. There were no bystanders when it came to the Lakers and Celtics.
Many of these elements are in place today and the game may be better now than it’s ever been, but it’s going to take both teams playing at the top of their conference the next three or four years for the rivalry to reach the heights it enjoyed in the ’80s.
Random thoughts:
» If the Stanley Cup finals set your postseason bar, the NBA Finals have a tall order ahead. The Pittsburgh Penguins winning Game 5 in triple overtime after tying the game with 34.3 seconds left in regulation. The Detroit Red Wings prevailing in Game 6 on Pittsburgh ice.
The swings in momentum. Exhaustion. Pucks to the face. Bone-rattling checks. The upstart Penguins gave a good account of themselves, but it was obvious the Red Wings were the superior team.
To see Chris Chelios in the Red Wings’ championship photos at the age of 46 is mind-boggling.
» Anybody who says professionals are above it all should watch the great ones try and reach a big milestone. The latest example? Ken Griffey Jr.’s attempt to reach 600 home runs is another case of a great player trying too hard, thinking too much.
Tim Liotta is a freelance journalist and regular contributor to The Examiner.



Comments from Examiner Readers
4:42 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008 re: "Steinmetz: Talent, experience say Lakers in five"
Report as inappropriate
7:05 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008
re: "Steinmetz: Talent, experience say Lakers in five"
Report as inappropriate
11:45 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008
re: "Steinmetz: Talent, experience say Lakers in five"
Report as inappropriate
7:31 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008
re: "Steinmetz: Talent, experience say Lakers in five"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Have you eaten your words yet on the Celtic/Lakers prediction? Or are you hoping readers will forget? The Lakers' big three? Please! How about the Lakers' big one plus two guys named Joe? (or was it curly and moe?). As for Kobe being the next Michael Jordan, how, as they kept saying on TV, can Kobe be the best player on the planet, when he isn't even the best player in the series? Or the second best, or the third? Jordan or Bird or Magic would take their teams on their backs and invite them to ride them to the promised land. When crunch time for Mr. MVP, he didn't show up. And Gasol as good as Kevin Garnett? Are you nuts? As Laker centers go, he played more in the tradition of Mel Counts than Jabbar or Chamberlain. Lamar Odom? For one quarter in game 4, he was lights out. For the rest, he was Mr. Brick. The Celtics got contributions from every player on their team. The Lakers got contributtions from...? I know you weren't the only one, but honestly, what were you thinking?
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
it's a team game alright Pierce, Garnett, and Allen. Gasol and Odom are softies. Did you even watch the 66 wins that the Celtics played and won before you made the prediction Lakers in 5?
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Nora said:
Detroit beat the Lakers a couple years ago they didn't exactly have the experience like LA who had won a few titles did they? Experience (esp. from a couple of years ago) means nothing and neither does this 'article.
9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
J said:
I stopped reading this after the writer stated "Rondo is not a true point guard, but he has done an admirable job of running the team." Um, Isn't that what a true point guard does? Run the team? When your assist to turnover ration is 3 to 1 in your first run in the NBA playoffs, I'm pretty sure that is a good indicator that he IS very much a point guard. Would you rather Ray Allen run the point and have Rondo launching three's? Don't think so- you want him to distribute the ball to the right people in the right spots- something good point guards do well.
12 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree