Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The City could save almost $400,000 a year and increase safety conditions by cutting and civilianizing positions throughout the county jail system while beefing up staffing at the overtime-heavy main jail, according to a draft copy of a budget analyst’s report obtained by The Examiner.
The report, set to be released this week, recommends cutting 15 deputy and supervisor positions from the ancillary jails, as well as civilianizing 16 positions in the records division. The cuts would save The City more than $2 million, allowing the Sheriff’s Department to shuffle and hire 60 sworn officers to County Jail No. 5 West, recently opened in San Bruno.
The difference would be a savings of $387,824 in a year that Mayor Gavin Newsom has already proposed cutting the department’s operating expenditures by more than $10 million.
Staffing and overcrowding issues at the new jail, which houses The City’s long-term prisoners, became such an issue that an older facility was reopened on the same property in October. Sheriffs deputies have been putting in almost 1,500 hours of overtime per week, sometimes working 16-hour days, prompting the Board of Supervisors to call for the budget analyst’s report.
Overtime staffing is about 35 percent cheaper than hiring more sworn personnel because of mandatory fringe benefits, the report found, but the facility should be staffed with permanent personnel nonetheless, “In order to avoid staff fatigue and to ensure that the facility is operated safely.”
But implementing the recommendations could be difficult because of the contract between the union representing sheriff’s employees and The City, according to Sheriff Michael Hennessey. Both civilianization and the shuffling of resources would depend on renegotiation.
“Personally, I don’t have any problem with civilianization, but the city’s [memorandum of understanding] with the sheriff’s association sets minimum staffing levels at each county jail,” Hennessey said.
The contract is set to expire in June 2009, and the budget analyst report recommends eliminating all references to minimum staffing levels at jail facilities. Deputy Sheriff David Wong, president of the San Francisco Sheriff’s Association, said contract negotiations should prove contentious.
“It is a very tough time for us, especially when you look at our pay,” he said. “Inmate attacks are always a probability when you have low staffing and a high jail population. That leads to lawsuits. Every time jail population increases, you have to adjust.”
A proposal by Mayor Gavin Newsom calling on city employees to take five days off next fiscal year without pay was overwhelmingly rejected by the San Francisco Sheriff’s Association.
In a heated discussion and vote, the deputies and supervisors in the union said their salaries were already too low and the rising price of gas wasn’t helping, association President David Wong said.
“I almost got lynched for bringing that package back to the union,” Wong said. “It wasn’t a calm meeting.”
Many of the deputies live outside The City due to the high cost of living, Wong said, and the prospect of $5-a-gallon gasoline in the future was cause for concern.
A spokesman for the mayor confirmed that the request was denied and that negotiations will continue.
Newsom offered to extend the union’s contract to 2011 if there was agreement on the furlough day issue.
The current contract is set to expire in June 2009.
— Brent Begin



Comments from Examiner Readers
12:59 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008 re: "Plan calls for job cuts from smaller jails"
Report as inappropriate
5:18 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Lawman voices discrimination fears"
Report as inappropriate
3:22 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Lawman voices discrimination fears"
Report as inappropriate
11:49 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Lawman voices discrimination fears"
Report as inappropriate
11:35 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Lawman voices discrimination fears"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Sheriff Hennessey has no problem with civilians running the place because he himself is a civilian, never worked as sworn peace officer. He would not be qualified be sheriff under today's laws.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Please click on the "Change My Location" link right under where it says "examiner.com San Francisco" and look at other cities. Find crime articles and click on them and see for yourselves who is committing these violent crimes across the country. I looked at Seattle, Indianapolis, Baltimore, Chicago and Dallas just to name a few, and most violent crimes were committed by black suspects. Look at the story titled "LA gang member turned author 'Monster' Kody sentenced to prison". I remember this monster (a moniker that couldn't be more accurate) from when I lived in LA and this guy was a walking crime wave. his mother says she raised him right but "something went wrong and the street won". Well, this guy is a hero to thousands of blacks who could not tell you what Barack Obama does for a living. Black crime is a nationwide crisis that everyone must confront, because everyone fears young black males. No one fears young black males more than other young black males. This has to change.
7 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The last thing a person like the previous commenter wants to do is admit the obvious. Racism against black people by the police in San Francisco, Oakland and most any other major city in the U.S. is real and happening all the time. If you don't realize the discrimination against black people is because you don't want to. Anybody who says otherwise is fooling themselves or otherwise trying to mislead people. They are part of the problem and the reason the police get away with it so often. Any other view on whether black people are discriminated against by the police is just B.S.
3 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thanks to the previous reader's comment. That pretty much sums it up. One wonders: Does Sheriff Hennessey not have anything more important to worry about?
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Puzzling? Blacks commit more crimes than any other racial demographic, plain and simple. All one has to do is look at other cities across the country and see for themselves. We may have a black population of 6% but it shows there is a high propensity for crime among this very small segment of SF's population. Is Hennessey inferring that whites are just as violent as blacks, but their crimes are being ignored by a complicit police department? Jail and prison stays are a right of passage among many blacks, and only blacks themselves can make changes to their lifestyles. If they don't want to change and refrain from their downward spiral, oh well. Society has given them thousands of opportunities and they have chosen to squander them, all in the name of "keeping it real".
21 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree