Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
“The next category Under Armour will attack is running,” Kevin Plank, Under Armour’s president and chief executive officer, said during the company’s first Investor Day last week.
Under Armour expects to begin selling running shoes in the first quarter of 2009, further challenging athletic shoe giants like Nike, Adidas and New Balance.
“We have demonstrated our ability to compete with the market leader [Nike],” Plank said.
The U.S. athletic footwear market generates about $9.5 billion in annual sales, according to NPD Group, Plank said.
Under Armour has designed six models of running shoes that would sell for $90 to $100.
“We believe this signifies a tremendous opportunity for growth in the footwear category,” said Raphael Peck, Under Armour’s senior vice president of footwear and licensing. “Footwear will be our growth driver — a major growth driver for Under Armour.”
Plank has also said Under Armour will consider launching a basketball shoe.
The company, which initially made its name in footwear by selling football and baseball cleats, on May 3 began selling three lines of Performance Training footwear.
According to SportsOneSource, the company sold about 40 percent of its initial stock of Performance Training footwear. Under Armour expects to sell 1 million pairs of cross trainers in 2008.
Despite a challenging retail environment, Under Armour’s net revenues increased 27 percent in the first quarter to $157.3 million, up from $124.3 million in the same period last year. The company expects 2008 sales of between $765 million and $775 million.
To kick off its Performance Trainer campaign, Under Armour spent an estimated $5 million for a 60-second commercial during the Super Bowl. The extra marketing expenses cut into the company’s first-quarter profit — down from $9.9 million to $2.9 million — and drew criticism from analysts, sending Under Armour’s stock price down.
“We don’t intend to run a Super Bowl ad for [the running shoe],” Plank said. “I promise.”
acannarsa@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
10:00 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 8, 2008 re: "Under Armour marketing efforts appeal to Beijing"
Report as inappropriate
8:31 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 30, 2008
re: "Under Armour profits sink in 2Q"
Report as inappropriate
8:17 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 30, 2008
re: "Under Armour profits sink in 2Q"
Report as inappropriate
2:00 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Tide Point expansion plan includes Under Armour space, residential units"
Report as inappropriate
1:05 PM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Tide Point expansion plan includes Under Armour space, residential units"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 29, 2008
re: "Tide Point expansion plan includes Under Armour space, residential units"
Report as inappropriate
12:17 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "Under Armour to kick off effort aimed at women"
Report as inappropriate
8:16 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 10, 2007
re: "Under Armour to kick off effort aimed at women"
Report as inappropriate
Neil B. said:
This is not surprising. They have most of their manufacturing in China. Makes sense they try to appeal to the Chinese women.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's faze not phase, you phools.
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The correct word is "faze"... The news didn’t appear to faze Under Armour Chairman.. and not "The news didn’t appear to phase Under Armour Chairman"
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
BA said:
They have a right to complain about population density if they've already lived there. I'm surprised that if you sell homes there you wouldn't see this! What roads do you take in there when you show a house, are they: Fort ave, Fort ave, Fort ave, and the water taxi? I live in the South Baltimore neighborhood and that traffic'll even effect me. It's like the idea of building a whole commmunity where the Balt. Sun printing factory is in S. Baltimore off Hanover St, what road infrastructure will they use for that growth? Will they build a ramp directly into I-95?
71 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What
61 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Dunn said:
Wait a minute... This Locust Point, there is new construction everywhere. One of the best assets in this area is Tide Point, it has done a lot for the community - the beautiful boardwalk with hammocks, kayaks, and views, with great employment. Also, this is Struever Bros., who tend to do things right. My guess is that the older residents are the angry ones. But the new residents who pay 6x the taxes are for it. Tide Point and Struever is not the problem here, but there is a lot of ugly new construction that doesn't jive. I'm not a resident here but I do sell homes in this area, this certainly won't hurt property values.
75 agree | 65 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I just saw the advert on TV...The girls soccer team in this gear is HOT!!! This should be the required uniform, I'll love soccer a bit more!!!
193 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
prn said:
They've definitely cornered the apparel market and drastically cut into Nike's share of the market. Their ads are very effective and just by looking at the pic and seeing the very beautiful local talent they used for their shoot, I imagine it will be highly successful.
205 agree | 208 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree