California News

Strap in, but keep your wallet out

May 23, 2008 3:00 AM (98 days ago) by Mike Aldax, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT

SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT (Map, News) - After checking in for her American Airlines flight, Mary Anne Donohue pointed at her watch and said, “Imagine if the company that sold me this watch charged me for every hour it ticks.”

The 56-year-old San Rafael resident then held up her boarding pass.

“That’s how I feel when I buy a plane ticket,” she said.

Donohue is one of many travelers frustrated by the mounting number of fees and charges U.S. airlines have recently placed on amenities that were once free for fliers. New fees on once-complimentary perks, such as food, seat requests, headphones and transporting pets, are part of an effort by many airlines to offset soaring fuel costs in a declining industry.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Four of the five most popular airlines at San Francisco International Airport, including United and Continental, raised fares in March by as much as $50. Several airlines, such as US Airways, began charging $25 for a second checked bag. And American Airlines — the nation’s largest carrier — announced Wednesday that it will start charging $15 for domestic fliers’ first checked bag. Carry-on bags, however, will continue to be free.

The new charge was the latest on a list of new costs travelers have endured in recent years — particularly on domestic flights. Airline analysts say it’s possible other carriers will also begin charging passengers for checking the first bag.

“They’ll charge every possible fee. … I guess they could start charging humans by the pound,” FareCompare.com CEO Rick Seaney said.

In the last decade, many airlines have tacked on extra fees for booking via phone or for in-flight movies; some are now charging more than $5 for requesting an aisle or window seat, Seaney said, though nonalcoholic drinks continue to be free. The extra fees are on top of higher costs for airfare, sales tax and even a TSA security fee, which went into effect after the Sept. 11 attacks, Seaney said.

While the additional fees might help offset jet-fuel costs, they haven’t done much to the help the industry’s bottom line, Seaney said. JP Morgan analysts estimate U.S. airlines will lose $7 billion this year, pointing the finger at the $130-a-barrel price for oil. And with the price of oil rising with no apparent peak in sight, charging for luggage won’t save from those losses.

But David A. Castelveter with the Air Transport Association of America, a trade organization representing major U.S. airlines, said the rising costs are not about returning to profitability.

“They’re doing everything they can do to survive,” Castelveter said.

He said the expected fuel bill for U.S. passenger and cargo airlines for 2008 is going to be upward of $60 billion dollars. The fuel bill last year was $18 billion less.

maldax@sfexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

10:53 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 28, 2008 re: "It saves to fly out of San Francisco"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree, Southwest aircraft, besides the Boeing 737-700, are pretty beat up and ghetto. Flying Virgin is the only way to go, clean new Airbus Aircraft, freindly staff, and tons of entertainment onboard. I only wish they flew to other destnations out of San Diego.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:11 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "It saves to fly out of San Francisco"

Wai Yip Tung said:
Of course they do fly to New York.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:49 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "It saves to fly out of San Francisco"

Examiner Reader said:
But the low cost carriers out of SFO do not fly to places like Chicago, New York, or do they?

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 AM MST on Mon., May. 26, 2008 re: "Passengers are not happy with SFO"

Examiner Reader said:
truly poor vender selection,food services extremely limited.... one only needs to travel outside of the U.S. to make a comparison ie zurich, heathrow vender food serivice quite varied... services in sfo are sooo predictably bland off the shelf vendors and services... ray okamoto frequent flyer

10 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:37 AM MST on Mon., May. 26, 2008 re: "Passengers are not happy with SFO"

Examiner Reader said:
I read this in the printed copy. It shows Philli coming in first. No wonder the managers at SFO are taking shots at the study. Not like SFO would be a jewel by the sea... but Philli?

9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:58 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Virgin takes off while competitors lay low"

Examiner Reader said:
I find Virgin America a bunch of fun to fly!

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:38 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008 re: "Lawsuit talk buzzing about airport noise"

Examiner Reader said:
Go for it! The noise over Montara and Moss Beach has become unbearable on some days. And the claim that the airport cares and calls back is BS. I have called them on really bad days and not once have they had the courtesy to return a call and discuss the issues. They deserve what is coming for them.

10 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:26 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008 re: "Bay Area reacts to rescheduling"

Examiner Reader said:
Once again the genius of the marketplace has brought us the current state of u.s. airlines. I suspect many of us flyers would be willing to pay a bit more not to be left waiting at the gate.

10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:03 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007 re: "2 flights grounded at SFO"

Examiner Reader said:
southwest is super ghetto with the lack of seat assignments, while it's lax it is not efficient and planes look beat up and in poor shape

72 agree | 84 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:00 PM MST on Fri., Dec. 21, 2007 re: "2 American Airlines flights grounded at SFO"

Examiner Reader said:
Southwest....is the only way to go!

92 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement