Lashing from supervisor prompts building reforms
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Fairfax County staff have agreed to a series of reforms in how they inspect construction projects after a supervisor’s fiery reprimand over a “multitude of errors” that allowed a large house to sprout dangerously close to three roads.

Jeff McKay, who represents the Lee District, this week delivered a brutal criticism of “sloppy staff work” that went into inspecting and approving a home on Amherst Avenue in Springfield. He said Wednesday that county staff told him they would make changes to prevent a repeat of the mistake.

One change will be that an inspector no longer will have the discretion to approve changes on site that he deems minimal, McKay said.

“As a result of what has happened at this address, those kinds of changes now are going to come back through the process, we’re not going to on site say that’s OK,” he said.

He said staff also has agreed to inspect sites earlier “to make sure that what’s happening on the site is what’s in the permit” and prevent major problems from being discovered after the house is already built.

In addition, contractors no longer will be issued building permits on the spot after a walk-through with inspectors.

“We’re not going to do that anymore for new construction,” McKay said. “You’re going to submit [plans], the county is going to have a period of time in which they can review it and get back to you.”

The Amherst Avenue site’s problems were “absolutely unbelievable,” said Dranesville District Supervisor John Foust, who said he doesn’t believe such problems are widespread throughout the county.

“I think it’s exceptional that things could go so badly,” he said.

Fairfax County staff has “concurred that some mistakes were made,” on the inspection and permitting of the house, said county spokesman Jeremy Lasich, who called the site “unique.”

wflook@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:11 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "Fairfax board nixes move to put employees in new apartment complexes"

Examiner Reader said:
There are better ways to provide funds to county employees to help them with the "high" cost of living in Fairfax County. Just look into the details of this expensive, to the tax payer, project. (Lost Real Estate Taxes and sweetheart deals.) The tax payers in Fairfax County must wake up and see where the "one penny" Real Estate taxes allocated to affotdable housing is really going. These DEALS should see the "light of day" in the tax payers eyes.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

7:39 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 18, 2007 re: "Fairfax to spend $100M on apartment complex"

Examiner Reader said:
Why is Connolly using taxpayer money to pay double the assessed value for this apartment complex? This deserves a follow up story. Wouldn't it be cheaper to build new units on County owned property? Who owns this complex now and who are they related to? Are County assessments that far off?

109 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)