Pr. William board backs proposal to fight foreclosures
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Prince William County supervisors unanimously backed a plan on Tuesday to combat their soaring foreclosure rate by helping county employees buy the vacant houses.

Officials said the program would cost almost nothing and pose little financial risk for the county. But a host of questions remain about how the to administer the plan, which would shift investments to banks that would offer lower rates to employees seeking mortgages.

Among the issues still unresolved are how many and which government employees would be interested and the portion of the county’s investments that would need to be rerouted.

“We have a lot of details still to chase down,” said Prince William County Finance Director Christopher Martino, who offered an early vision of the program that was endorsed at Tuesday’s board meeting.

Under the program, a county employee would select a house to buy and make normal financial arrangements with a bank participating in the program. At that point, the county would buy a 10-year certificate of deposit that the bank would use to fund the mortgage and provide the buyer a lower interest rate.

Supervisors hope the initiative will fill some of the 7,000 vacant and foreclosed homes — the most in the state — with teachers, law-enforcement officials, firefighters and other employees, who typically cannot afford to live in Prince William County.

The aim is similar to a program proposed in Fairfax County, although the means is much different. The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors is weighing a bundle of measures that would involve purchasing, revamping and selling the foreclosed homes, as well as offering loan assistance to first-time buyers.

“I think they’re both good ideas,” Steve Baugher, executive director of the Virginia Association of Mortgage Brokers and a member of Gov. Tim Kaine’s Foreclosure Prevention Task Force, said of the Fairfax and Prince William measures. “I think we’re in a situation where we have to think outside the box, and anything that will work at this point is a plus.”

Martino said the county can safely limit the program to 5 percent of its investment portfolio — which could be as much as $50 million — and proposed to have employees undergo financial training and make their mortgage payments through payroll deductions.

wflook@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

9:10 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 10, 2008 re: "Mixed results for June foreclosures"

Examiner Reader said:
Let me get this straight in: - Prince William one of every 86 housholds faces foreclosure. That's 1.2% foreclosed with 98.8% not foreclosed. - Nation wide one of every 501 faces foreclosure. That's 0.2% foreclosed with 99.8% not foreclosed. - Loudoun one of every 199 faces foreclosure. That's 0.5% foreclosed with 99.5% not forclosed. Is my math wrong? Are we blowing a problem way out of proportion? Why not present the data this way? Where is the crisis, when over 98.0% of motgages are not foreclosed, that deserves panic?

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:49 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008 re: "Fairfax to consider proposal to fight foreclosure crisis"

Examiner Reader said:
I just want to laugh at all of you who were suckers and bought at the height of the market. Guess there was a sucker born every minute and it only takes one to sell an overpriced house. You thought that the only way was up and that the sky will never fall. It's people like you who placed me out of the market a few years ago and I couldn't buy back then. Now I am a buyer and the prices are even better than what it was before the boom because of the foreclosures!

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:09 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Foreclosures drop in D.C. and Northern Virginia"

Examiner Reader said:
White people were given the same loans! COme on, stop making everything a black/white issue.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:22 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "Foreclosures plunge in Maryland, Virginia, rise in D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
It's just some con. This foreclosure thing has just begun to play out!

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:34 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Bankruptcy numbers continue to increase"

Corey Brooks said:
Go Elysha!

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:25 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "City, Wells Fargo trade blame in foreclosure crisis"

Examiner Reader said:
Some of these mortgage lenders and brokers exploited people of all ethnicities. The poor and lower middle class got hit hardest. African-Americans in Baltimore bled more simply because Baltimore's population of poor and lower middle class happen to be predominantly African-American. I'm sure Wells-Fargo employed fraudulent, unscrupulous, unfair, predatory, and exploitive lending practices. But, so has JP Morgan Chase, Chase Manhattan, Chase Home Finance, Countrywide, Advantage, and a myriad of others.

9 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "City, Wells Fargo trade blame in foreclosure crisis"

Examiner Reader said:
A lawsuit against Wells Fargo for allegedly destroying the City by foreclosing on the homes of African Americans will backfire. Housing lenders will factor that risk assessment into their new home loans and the losers will be African-Americans. As long as African-Americans vote for political heroes that promise stop the villains from “exploiting” them they will continue to be at the bottom of the ecomomic ladder. Moral melodrama may be politically attractive, but it is ecomomically destructive.

8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:36 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "Pr. William board backs proposal to fight foreclosures"

Examiner Reader said:
Let the market do it's job. County, State and Federal governments should not be in the real estate market. They will just add another burden on the tax payers who did not make bad financial decisions. How many mortgages are current? Focus on the right statistic not the negative one that encourages poor government decisions to bail out speculators and others who made bad financial decisions..

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:30 PM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008 re: "Fairfax proposes limiting purchases of foreclosed homes"

BuildingDC.com said:
At least Fairfax is doing something about the foreclosures although I cant see that a 10 home purchase will do much to help the situation. It is a start, though. More videos & articles at buildingdc.com

7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:14 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008 re: "Fairfax proposes limiting purchases of foreclosed homes"

Examiner Reader said:
Would someone please inform Chairman Connoly that it is not "the governments" money he is spending on housing. It is the tax payers money. Herrity is right. Get the county government out of the rental and resale housing business.

7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:26 PM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Foreclosure furor remains high in area"

Reader said:
To our great leaders: Eminant domain the banks and seize foreclosures, lower the criteria for FHA and assistance or you will see a serious deficit. Allan Greenspan is no rocket scientist. Hold the banks accountable along with BGE. We all fall down rich or poor. Put class and race in the government who live off the dole of the people. Tax the drug dealers out of their homes.

10 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:41 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Foreclosure furor remains high in area"

Examiner Reader said:
How do you buy a foreclosure?

5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:43 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Foreclosure furor remains high in area"

Examiner Reader said:
Help me understand; what was the purpose of this foreclosure moratorium? Was it to keep people who could never have afforded to make a single honest payment for their home in the home for another glorious Maryland Spring. If the purpose was to have these struggling homeowners refinance themselves out of their crisis, then the Gov and Idiotslature should have checked to see if conditions were right and the pieces were in place to accomplish that goal. They are not. While prime interest rates have dropped, the drop is not reflected in home loan rates. While FHA has raised their maximums and lowered their credit score requirements, they have instututed a rule making it impossible to go FHA if a person has been late on a payment within a year. Uuuuh...aren't those the people needing help? All this while people are getting further upside down in their loans. When the moratorium comes off expect a tidal wave of foreclosures to wash over Maryland taking billions in equity along with it.

10 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:05 PM MST on Sun., May. 11, 2008 re: "Foreclosure furor remains high in area"

Reader said:
One way to get rid of drug addicts is to rent your home before foreclosure to the worst people you can find and screw the neighborhood. Get back at Government for not loving thy neighbor. When crime increases, who will they blame.

6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:21 AM MST on Sat., May. 10, 2008 re: "Foreclosure furor remains high in area"

Examiner Reader said:
BREAKING NEWS: If you borrow money from a bank, you have to pay it back. If you don't, the bank will recover the balance owed by selling the property. It's a practice that has allowed millions to experience the American dream of home ownership. If you borrow money to gamble, like buying too much house and hoping the market will increase the value, sometimes you loose. Don't blame other for the risks you take.

13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:29 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Foreclosure furor remains high in area"

Examiner Reader said:
Stricter regulation will simply mean fewer unqualified people owning homes which is a good thing. The bad thing is, with rising tax assessments, they won't be able to afford to rent from people who can qualify for a real mortgage and will thus be further forced to suckle from the government teat (i.e. Section 8 housing). There is no easy solution, but it is clear that those who took subprime loans got something for close to nothing and are now reaping what they've sown. I have no sympathy for those who could not understand the most basic financial parameters of home ownership or did not seek impartial help from others clearly smarter than them before signing the loan papers.

7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:58 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Foreclosure furor remains high in area"

Future VA Resident said:
While I can sympathise with the army vet who had a rotten floor that inspectors missed, that's a risk of home ownership and you don't deserve anything...To the other lady who's east Bmore Home went from 1662 to 2200, I wonder what she bought with the equity she most definetly took when she refinanced into an adjustable loan? What the new car isn't helping you make your payments...If you've been makeing the same salary for 15 years then you need to look for a 2nd job before you come demanding that I give you my tax dollars...GROW UP FOLKS, you entered into legally binding contracts now you have to live with the choices you've made...NOT MY PROBLEM!

12 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:32 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Foreclosure furor remains high in area"

Examiner Reader said:
Home ownership is a privilege. It is not a right. I have no sympathy for anyone who took out subprime mortgages. We financially responsible citizens should not have to pay for the stupidity and outright greed of others. AMK

9 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:58 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008 re: "Senate OKs bill to tackle housing woes"

Examiner Reader said:
now they have to deceide on if they are going tackle something thats not going to be tackled now or ever.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:59 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Daly City foreclosure rate highest in county"

DC-Resident. said:
Categorizing the foreclosures in Daly City as a "minority" problem is totally nonsensical. Filipinos and Hispanics make up the majority, so it's completely logical that they make up most of the foreclosures. Around a quarter of the city is white, and it's likely that many of those that are homeowners bought in during the 60s-70s. Little known fact these days: The original Daly City home owners associations were highly discriminatory and pressured home owners to not even associate with non-whites, much less sell their homes to them, for fear it would damage property values. How times have changed very quickly...

9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:01 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Montgomery County mulls buying area’s foreclosed homes"

Robin Ficker Broker Robin Realty said:
So we are getting the largest property tax increase in 20 years, which is causing foreclosures, to buy homes which are being foreclosed on. The county will be competing against private individuals who are trying to buy these homes. Mark Fennel who is running for County Council in the April 15, May 13 special election, is opposed to the largest property tax increase in 20 years and has promised to stick to the charter property tax limit. Don Praisner, his 76 yeard old opponent is in favor of the largest property tax increase in 20 years and had promised to exceed the charter property tax limit. Vote for Mark Fennel for County Council and Property Tax Relief!

4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:05 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008 re: "Montgomery County foreclosures up about 85 percent from last year"

Robin Ficker Broker Robin Realty said:
The Montgomery County Government is part of the problem, not the solution. County Executive Leggett and County Council President Knapp want to give us the biggest property tax increase in 20 years. This will drive hundreds more into foreclosure.

7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:42 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 31, 2008 re: "Daly City foreclosure rate highest in county"

TbytheSea said:
All the more reason immigrants should learn to speak English. I do not feel it is anyones responsibility to bail people out of their loans, immigrant or not. Funny to think that if these people that had these types of loans had made $30,000 on thier homes they sure wouldn't be complaining now. The American Dream sometimes comes with risks......

10 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:30 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 29, 2008 re: "Connolly proposes to buy foreclosures, sell as affordable ‘work force’ housing"

Examiner Reader said:
Connolly has created a welfare state in Fairfax County. He loves using other people's money for his LIBERAL causes. As more illegals move to Fairfax Country, Connelly buys their votes with more and more programs. Time for Connolly to join the US Congress since he has now proven he is a left wing LIBERAL who will fit in nicely in Washington, DC., the welfare capital of the USA.

10 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:47 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 re: "Connolly proposes to buy foreclosures, sell as affordable ‘work force’ housing"

Examiner Reader said:
Connolly should buy houses at his expense, not tax payers. As a Fed employee scraping along in Fairfax County I find this disgusting

8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:56 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 re: "Connolly proposes to buy foreclosures, sell as affordable ‘work force’ housing"

Examiner Reader said:
So let me see if I have this right. For those of us scrapping along and saving to try and afford a house, we might actually be able to afford one conveniently in Fairfax now because of the down turn in the housing market. Meaning we can stop spending an extra hour every day in our cars commuting, wasting more money on gas and polluting the environment. But no. Wait. Now this guy is going to buy up all the affordable housing. Creating less of a supply of houses. Which will end up in raising overall housing prices in Fairfax. Of course those of us struggling will once again be out of luck because we'll all make too much money to afford. That's right. Help out the rich. Give more money to those to lazy and unwilling to work (or just living here illegally) and fund it all on the middle class who spend hours every day because the only home they can afford is a 1 room condo 30 miles from where they work. He lost my vote just for *thinking* of doing this.

11 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:02 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 re: "Connolly proposes to buy foreclosures, sell as affordable ‘work force’ housing"

Reader said:
Pat Herrity makes sense on this issue...we need more like him!

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:58 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 re: "Connolly proposes to buy foreclosures, sell as affordable ‘work force’ housing"

Examiner Reader said:
Don't pay your employees and spend the $$$ on houses...who is stearing the ship? OH yea no one!!!

9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:10 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 re: "Connolly proposes to buy foreclosures, sell as affordable ‘work force’ housing"

Examiner Reader said:
Since when is it the county's job to enter the housing market as a broker/dealer? Tax revenue is projected to be down, but these clown Democrats on the BoS are proposing adding things to buy (houses) and staffing yet more agencies (strike force teams)? The logic escapes me, but that's probably why I'm not a politician.

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:44 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 2, 2008 re: "Three Md. areas included in list of the hardest hit by foreclosures"

Examiner Reader said:
Bethesda foreclosures, you poor things!

50 agree | 41 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:11 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Maryland's foreclosure strategy targets mortgage-loan service response"

Examiner Reader said:
govt did not lend money to borrowers with no income, no job, and no assets-Wall Street lenders did that. Lack of real enforcement of laws, and fudiciary duty to investors, and pure greed caused lenders to loan and borrowers to borrow money they could not pay back. If lenders based their loans on collateral, character, and credit ( the 3 C's), then these loans would not have gone bad. Lenders are not forced to lend money to unqualified borrowers. Redlining is about arbritary lending by other reasons than the basics (the 3 C's). Leave to the pundits to blame govt lending laws, but lending in the City or poor areas should still be based on the basics ( 3 C's ). Most banks regulated by Federal Reserve Board are doing fine, and they will survive this mess. Most borrowers won't because the Market has already left them high and dry. I am talking about victims of outright fraud and negligence, and by the way this happens in the counties also, and not just to minorities.

57 agree | 42 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:32 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Maryland's foreclosure strategy targets mortgage-loan service response"

Examiner Reader said:
Politicians threaten lenders who red line neighborhoods as economic protection. With redlining banned, government encourages unqualified people to buy a home they can't afford by borrowing money than they can pay back using sub-prime loans; and when they can’t make the payments they whine for the same government that got them into trouble to seize money from other people who have been more responsible to bail them out. What does this tell you about government? What does it tell you about the whiners? What has happened to the concept of personal responsibility?

54 agree | 47 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:28 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "Maryland's foreclosure strategy targets loan servicers"

Examiner Reader said:
If thes loans were not given ,I think everyone would be crying discrimination.People in the city were not the only ones who took these loans. Many people were hoping the price of housing would go up before this crunch occurred. What makes the crunch even worst in MD is the high taxes and closing on these properties. Perhaps O'Malley can refung these fees to help offset the problem instead of his tax and spend policy.

56 agree | 51 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:19 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008 re: "State’s foreclosure strategy targets loan servicers"

avid reader said:
I guess O'Malley will blame this on Ehrlich too. Same old crap.

55 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:29 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
Conscious Reader: your point is lost on those who LIVE in baltimore city, as the leaders here are only targeting the lenders for taking advantage of African Americans. Sorta blows a hole right through your rant. Otherwise I agree with a lot of your sentiment.

54 agree | 55 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:52 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
Let pretend I'm a lender. You walk into my office with all your papperwork, and I determine that you're credit-worthy. I ask you where the property is, and you say Baltimore City. I say, "thanks for stopping by, and please help yourself to a free tote bag on your way out". "Sorry we can't help you, but good luck".

72 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:18 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
Dunn where can I read that story?

56 agree | 54 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:09 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
This is a well written article!

66 agree | 53 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:45 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Foreclosures up 455 percent in ’07"

Examiner Reader said:
"0.83 percent of all Maryland households, according to online foreclosure research firm RealtyTrac." What was it in the mid 90's? If I remember, it was about 2%. The only reason we are hearing about this now is because of the election and the dinosaur media has an agenda to get a demoncrat in the WH.

68 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:44 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
The democrat leaders of Baltimore failed everyone, black and white.

67 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:22 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
More IDIOCY from the City government. Now that they have control of it, we will see how much deeper they can dig their own hole.

76 agree | 58 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:21 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
Government created this problem. More government regulation and taxation will not fix the problem, an likely make it worse. Government needs to get out of the way and let the market sort things out.

69 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:39 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
Excuse me Conscious Reader but it is Black leadership of Baltimore that is saying it was racial discrimination in how they loaned money that created the situation? What Republicans accused Wells Fargo of discriminatory lending practices?

75 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:24 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Conscious Reader said:
Of course it is the Republican mindset to try and make this issue a Black/White issue...when there are just as many "WHITE" people in this country losing their homes too! Stop using this stupid race thing to exacerbate this problem. This problem is affecting EVERYONE! I am Black, and I am concerned about the affect it is having on my White/Hispanic/Asian/Indian neighbors. It is not fair for us to make this problem an issue that is solely happening because Black people were given messed up loans. I will be so glad when all the majority of those that would race bait, and keep injecting race into issues that affect all Americans finally die off! Enough already! How do we help our neighbors, and keep these foreclosures from further eroding our equity when they pop up in our communities? They are in "EVERYONE'S" communities! Stop making this about race. It has always been dirty realtors and lenders that took advantage of people. People trying to simply live the American dream!

77 agree | 67 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:09 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Examiner Reader said:
This will only encourage lenders not to bother with Baltimore City. Why should they give out any mortgages if they have to deal with more regulatory hassles that amount to nothing? It will only contribute to fewer homes being sold among people who are actually financially qualified to own a home, make it harder for people to sell homes, and increase the number of vacant properties for squatters, drug addicts and drug dealers to use. Perhaps this is what the City Council (completely dominated by Democrats) wants so that they can stay in power.

78 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:57 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "Bill would force lenders to maintain Baltimore City’s foreclosed properties"

Dunn said:
This whole thing is short sighted and all about property tax. Baltimore has failed for years to unload thousands of vacant homes, what is few hundred more going to do. I'll say it again, take the $75M that was just approved by the State so landlords can fix mechanicals on Section 8 properties. Use the $75M to renovate 7000 homes in the city and give them away for free. The new owners are required to live there for 5 years, pay taxes and utilities. This would solve the "affordable housing and vanact house" issues. Not to mention gives some people an opportunity for home ownership and diginity. Currently the $75M is being thrown at cash flow postive investors, which make no sense what so ever. Or even better, just give the $75M back to tax payers.

71 agree | 54 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:49 PM MST on Sun., Feb. 3, 2008 re: "Foreclosures up 455 percent in ’07"

Examiner Reader said:
12:24, and just think this is only the start,keep your chinese shoes and tennies in good repair.

74 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:24 PM MST on Mon., Jan. 28, 2008 re: "Housing advocates protest foreclosures"

Examiner Reader said:
Here we go again...pyramid schemes, multi level marketing, Enron, Dot Com Bubble Burst, Sub-Prime mortgages, etc. Please wake up to the constant scams dreamed up everyday.

77 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:40 AM MST on Mon., Jan. 28, 2008 re: "Housing advocates protest foreclosures"

Examiner Reader said:
dont speak for all blacks.there are some of us out here with cell's in our brain.its not a black white thing.pay you stay.read everything when you dont understand get a lawyer.pay your bill's.

59 agree | 61 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:24 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 25, 2008 re: "Housing advocates protest foreclosures"

Reader Carol said:
Enough of the Black folks this/White folks that. The issue is taking personal resonsibility for personal choices.

89 agree | 72 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree