Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Now a bill aimed at fast-tracking residential development along the Route 1 corridor threatens to exacerbate those ills, she and other residents said.
“We desire an infrastructure plan that is responsive to the needs of our community,” said Eggleston, who was representing the Elkridge Elementary School PTA and the Elkridge Landing Middle School PTSA at a public hearing Monday night.
The Howard County Council is considering a measure that would allow developers to take 125 additional housing allocations from future years to use for current projects.
County law allows for 1,850 housing units to be built each year; 250 of those are along the Route 1 corridor.
The change would allow a few projects waiting for housing allotments, such as the development at the Savage MARC station and the redevelopment of the former Aladdin mobile home park, to move forward.
The plan would help “maintain the momentum” of redevelopment until the county’s General Plan, which directs residential
growth, is revised in 2010, said Planning Director Marsha McLaughlin.
However, dozens of residents protested the measure Monday night, saying the change would add to the woes of an area grappling with a recent development boom.
Cathy Hudson, an Elkridge resident and activist, echoed Eggleston’s concerns, telling council members services in the area are greatly needed, and hundreds of units are slated for construction in the next few years.
“How much more do you want to stuff quickly in an underserved area?” she asked.
The developments still would have to pass the public facilities ordinance that ensures adequate roads and schools.
Bridget Mugane, head of the Howard County Citizens Association, said the public facilities ordinance was “too weak.” Often developers just have to fix two intersections nearest to the project, but other areas remain congested, she said.
However, some residents lauded the proposal, saying it would encourage continued revitalization and prompt more affordable housing.
“We have always supported higher-density districts,” said Sherman Howell of the African American Coalition of Howard County.
smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
8:13 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Howard land-use group releases recommendations to involve public"
Report as inappropriate
11:25 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Two Council proposals take aim at the ‘infill’ development"
Report as inappropriate
5:13 AM MST on Sun., Feb. 3, 2008
re: "Ulman seeks to scrap plans for new government campus"
Report as inappropriate
4:29 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 11, 2008
re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"
Report as inappropriate
7:34 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008
re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"
Report as inappropriate
1:09 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007
re: "Council questions office-space purchase"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
This task force was heavily skewed toward the land development community.
7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
We are an extremly confused nation. We are not creating new urban areas, we are growing by about 2 million people a year, we want affordable housing, we want long time resident to never have to move, we don't want change or more density with 'infill', we want continued mass immigration -- often the same people and political parties are for all these things.
77 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I can't believe Ulman would waste over $7 million by abandoning plans, while at the same time giving his donor buddy a sweetheart lease with County funds. Wait a minute - I can believe it because Ulman is a deceptive arrogant jerk who slanders Mary Kay Sigaty to steal an election.
87 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Traffic engineers wouldn’t stay in business if they used false assumptions or data" Why not? Politicians stay in business when they use false data on their resumes. "Secretary of the Cabinet" anyone?
89 agree | 93 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Any protests to traffic conditions, etc., under Howard County's new administration will be ignored. What Mr. Ulman wants, Mr. Ulman will get. Remember this the next time you go to the polls.
90 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Doesn't a contributor to Ulman own the building where Ulman wants to sign an overpriced lease? But, just because someone fakes their resume to get elected, doesn't mean they will continue their dishonesty once in office...
110 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree