Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

Residents protest bill fast-tracking Rt. 1 development

May 21, 2008 12:00 AM (146 days ago) by Sara Michael, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Elizabeth Eggleston’s Elkridge neighborhood lacks a community center, the library is inadequate and the schools face overcrowding, she told county lawmakers.

Now a bill aimed at fast-tracking residential development along the Route 1 corridor threatens to exacerbate those ills, she and other residents said.

“We desire an infrastructure plan that is responsive to the needs of our community,” said Eggleston, who was representing the Elkridge Elementary School PTA and the Elkridge Landing Middle School PTSA at a public hearing Monday night.

The Howard County Council is considering a measure that would allow developers to take 125 additional housing allocations from future years to use for current projects.

This story continues below
Advertisement

County law allows for 1,850 housing units to be built each year; 250 of those are along the Route 1 corridor.

The change would allow a few projects waiting for housing allotments, such as the development at the Savage MARC station and the redevelopment of the former Aladdin mobile home park, to move forward.

The plan would help “maintain the momentum” of redevelopment until the county’s General Plan, which directs residential

growth, is revised in 2010, said Planning Director Marsha McLaughlin.

However, dozens of residents protested the measure Monday night, saying the change would add to the woes of an area grappling with a recent development boom.

Cathy Hudson, an Elkridge resident and activist, echoed Eggleston’s concerns, telling council members services in the area are greatly needed, and hundreds of units are slated for construction in the next few years.

“How much more do you want to stuff quickly in an underserved area?” she asked.

The developments still would have to pass the public facilities ordinance that ensures adequate roads and schools.

Bridget Mugane, head of the Howard County Citizens Association, said the public facilities ordinance was “too weak.” Often developers just have to fix two intersections nearest to the project, but other areas remain congested, she said.

However, some residents lauded the proposal, saying it would encourage continued revitalization and prompt more affordable housing.

“We have always supported higher-density districts,” said Sherman Howell of the African American Coalition of Howard County.

smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

8:13 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Howard land-use group releases recommendations to involve public"

Examiner Reader said:
This task force was heavily skewed toward the land development community.

7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:25 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Two Council proposals take aim at the ‘infill’ development"

Examiner Reader said:
We are an extremly confused nation. We are not creating new urban areas, we are growing by about 2 million people a year, we want affordable housing, we want long time resident to never have to move, we don't want change or more density with 'infill', we want continued mass immigration -- often the same people and political parties are for all these things.

77 agree | 70 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:13 AM MST on Sun., Feb. 3, 2008 re: "Ulman seeks to scrap plans for new government campus"

Examiner Reader said:
I can't believe Ulman would waste over $7 million by abandoning plans, while at the same time giving his donor buddy a sweetheart lease with County funds. Wait a minute - I can believe it because Ulman is a deceptive arrogant jerk who slanders Mary Kay Sigaty to steal an election.

87 agree | 88 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:29 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 11, 2008 re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"

Examiner Reader said:
"Traffic engineers wouldn’t stay in business if they used false assumptions or data" Why not? Politicians stay in business when they use false data on their resumes. "Secretary of the Cabinet" anyone?

89 agree | 93 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:34 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008 re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"

Examiner Reader said:
Any protests to traffic conditions, etc., under Howard County's new administration will be ignored. What Mr. Ulman wants, Mr. Ulman will get. Remember this the next time you go to the polls.

90 agree | 83 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:09 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007 re: "Council questions office-space purchase"

Examiner Reader said:
Doesn't a contributor to Ulman own the building where Ulman wants to sign an overpriced lease? But, just because someone fakes their resume to get elected, doesn't mean they will continue their dishonesty once in office...

110 agree | 107 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement